骨科治疗大转子疼痛综合征的疗效和安全性:一项全面的范围综述。

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Ali Parsa, Saeid Esmaeilian, Adam W Anz, Farimah Naghibian, Morteza Behjat, Neda Mirzaei, Elham Rahmanipour, Mohammad Ghorbani
{"title":"骨科治疗大转子疼痛综合征的疗效和安全性:一项全面的范围综述。","authors":"Ali Parsa, Saeid Esmaeilian, Adam W Anz, Farimah Naghibian, Morteza Behjat, Neda Mirzaei, Elham Rahmanipour, Mohammad Ghorbani","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2024.82620.3762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of orthobiologics in the treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS), with a focus on pain relief, functional improvement, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and CINAHL for studies published from January 1, 2000, to March 20, 2024. Eligible studies included case series, cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the use of orthobiologics for GTPS. The primary outcomes assessed were pain, function, and quality of life. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the JADAD scale, the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and the MINORS score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 19 studies involving a total of 811 participants. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was found to significantly reduce pain, as measured by the VAS scores, and to improve functional outcomes including the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores. These findings suggest that PRP may be an effective treatment for GTPS. The studies reported minimal side effects that were generally mild and transient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRP and other orthobiologic treatments show promise in managing GTPS, showing good safety profiles and potential benefits. However, further high-quality RCTs are necessary to confirm long-term efficacy and to establish standardized treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 4","pages":"176-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12050079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy and Safety of Orthobiologic Treatments for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Parsa, Saeid Esmaeilian, Adam W Anz, Farimah Naghibian, Morteza Behjat, Neda Mirzaei, Elham Rahmanipour, Mohammad Ghorbani\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/ABJS.2024.82620.3762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of orthobiologics in the treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS), with a focus on pain relief, functional improvement, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and CINAHL for studies published from January 1, 2000, to March 20, 2024. Eligible studies included case series, cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the use of orthobiologics for GTPS. The primary outcomes assessed were pain, function, and quality of life. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the JADAD scale, the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and the MINORS score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 19 studies involving a total of 811 participants. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was found to significantly reduce pain, as measured by the VAS scores, and to improve functional outcomes including the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores. These findings suggest that PRP may be an effective treatment for GTPS. The studies reported minimal side effects that were generally mild and transient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRP and other orthobiologic treatments show promise in managing GTPS, showing good safety profiles and potential benefits. However, further high-quality RCTs are necessary to confirm long-term efficacy and to establish standardized treatment protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"176-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12050079/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2024.82620.3762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2024.82620.3762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本综述旨在评估骨科治疗大转子疼痛综合征(GTPS)的安全性和有效性,重点关注疼痛缓解、功能改善和生活质量。方法:综合检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Scopus、谷歌Scholar和CINAHL,检索2000年1月1日至2024年3月20日发表的研究。符合条件的研究包括病例系列研究、队列研究、病例对照研究和随机对照试验(RCTs),这些研究调查了骨科在GTPS中的应用。评估的主要结果是疼痛、功能和生活质量。使用JADAD量表、Cochrane偏倚风险工具和未成年人评分来评估研究的质量。结果:本综述纳入19项研究,共涉及811名受试者。根据VAS评分,富血小板血浆(PRP)可显著减轻疼痛,并改善功能结果,包括改进的Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)和西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分。这些发现提示PRP可能是治疗GTPS的有效方法。这些研究报告了最小的副作用,通常是轻微和短暂的。结论:PRP和其他骨科治疗方法治疗GTPS具有良好的安全性和潜在的益处。然而,需要进一步的高质量随机对照试验来确认长期疗效并建立标准化的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Efficacy and Safety of Orthobiologic Treatments for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.

Objectives: This scoping review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of orthobiologics in the treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS), with a focus on pain relief, functional improvement, and quality of life.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and CINAHL for studies published from January 1, 2000, to March 20, 2024. Eligible studies included case series, cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the use of orthobiologics for GTPS. The primary outcomes assessed were pain, function, and quality of life. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the JADAD scale, the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and the MINORS score.

Results: The review included 19 studies involving a total of 811 participants. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was found to significantly reduce pain, as measured by the VAS scores, and to improve functional outcomes including the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores. These findings suggest that PRP may be an effective treatment for GTPS. The studies reported minimal side effects that were generally mild and transient.

Conclusion: PRP and other orthobiologic treatments show promise in managing GTPS, showing good safety profiles and potential benefits. However, further high-quality RCTs are necessary to confirm long-term efficacy and to establish standardized treatment protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信