南非助产士专家实践:法医学专家的经验。

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health SA Gesondheid Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2851
Kagiso P Tukisi, Zelda Janse van Rensburg, Wanda Jacobs
{"title":"南非助产士专家实践:法医学专家的经验。","authors":"Kagiso P Tukisi, Zelda Janse van Rensburg, Wanda Jacobs","doi":"10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical litigations are rising and becoming a global challenge. The multilayered demands of midwifery-related conditions and the multiple responsibilities of the midwifery team contribute to possible litigations. Midwife specialists in South Africa are trained to provide specialised midwifery care to improve outcomes for patients with midwifery-related complications. While midwife specialists are equipped with specialised knowledge and skills, no specific practice regulations exist to protect them against possible medical litigations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to explore and describe medico-legal experts' experiences of midwife specialists optimally utilising their knowledge and skills.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The context of the study is the public and private sectors of South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative, descriptive and contextual research design was employed. Six medico-legal experts identified through a snowball sampling technique participated in virtual, semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using Collaizi's descriptive method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes with subthemes emerged. Results confirmed that medico-legal experts recognised the midwife specialists' expanded knowledge and skill set. The medico-legal experts experienced a disconnect between training regulations and the current practice regulations. Midwife specialists' practice was experienced as being guided by a moral obligation rather than prescribed regulations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Midwife specialists are yet to receive full legal recognition in South Africa, challenging midwife specialists' assumption of autonomous and independent roles.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Midwife specialists face potential risk of involvement in medical litigations under the current legislative framework. The findings of this study may guide the formulation of a scope of practice (SOP) that legally guides midwife specialists' practice in South Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":45721,"journal":{"name":"Health SA Gesondheid","volume":"30 ","pages":"2851"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"South African midwife specialists practice: Medico-legal experts' experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Kagiso P Tukisi, Zelda Janse van Rensburg, Wanda Jacobs\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical litigations are rising and becoming a global challenge. The multilayered demands of midwifery-related conditions and the multiple responsibilities of the midwifery team contribute to possible litigations. Midwife specialists in South Africa are trained to provide specialised midwifery care to improve outcomes for patients with midwifery-related complications. While midwife specialists are equipped with specialised knowledge and skills, no specific practice regulations exist to protect them against possible medical litigations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to explore and describe medico-legal experts' experiences of midwife specialists optimally utilising their knowledge and skills.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The context of the study is the public and private sectors of South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative, descriptive and contextual research design was employed. Six medico-legal experts identified through a snowball sampling technique participated in virtual, semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using Collaizi's descriptive method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes with subthemes emerged. Results confirmed that medico-legal experts recognised the midwife specialists' expanded knowledge and skill set. The medico-legal experts experienced a disconnect between training regulations and the current practice regulations. Midwife specialists' practice was experienced as being guided by a moral obligation rather than prescribed regulations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Midwife specialists are yet to receive full legal recognition in South Africa, challenging midwife specialists' assumption of autonomous and independent roles.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Midwife specialists face potential risk of involvement in medical litigations under the current legislative framework. The findings of this study may guide the formulation of a scope of practice (SOP) that legally guides midwife specialists' practice in South Africa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health SA Gesondheid\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"2851\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067625/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health SA Gesondheid\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health SA Gesondheid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗诉讼正在上升,并成为一个全球性的挑战。助产相关条件的多层次需求和助产团队的多重责任有助于可能的诉讼。南非的助产士专家接受培训,提供专门的助产护理,以改善助产相关并发症患者的预后。虽然助产士专家具备专业知识和技能,但没有具体的实践条例来保护他们免受可能的医疗诉讼。目的:该研究旨在探索和描述医学法律专家的经验,助产士专家最佳地利用他们的知识和技能。背景:本研究的背景是南非的公共和私营部门。方法:采用定性、描述性和情境性研究设计。通过滚雪球抽样技术确定的六名法医专家参加了虚拟的半结构化访谈。采用Collaizi’s描述性方法对数据进行分析。结果:出现了三个主题和副主题。结果证实,法医学专家承认助产士专家的知识和技能有所扩大。法医学专家们经历了培训条例和现行实践条例之间的脱节。助产士专家的实践经验是由道德义务而不是规定的规定指导的。结论:助产士专家尚未得到充分的法律承认在南非,挑战助产士专家的假设自主和独立的角色。贡献:在现行立法框架下,助产士专家面临卷入医疗诉讼的潜在风险。本研究的结果可能会指导实践范围(SOP)的制定,从而在法律上指导南非助产士专家的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
South African midwife specialists practice: Medico-legal experts' experiences.

Background: Medical litigations are rising and becoming a global challenge. The multilayered demands of midwifery-related conditions and the multiple responsibilities of the midwifery team contribute to possible litigations. Midwife specialists in South Africa are trained to provide specialised midwifery care to improve outcomes for patients with midwifery-related complications. While midwife specialists are equipped with specialised knowledge and skills, no specific practice regulations exist to protect them against possible medical litigations.

Aim: The study aimed to explore and describe medico-legal experts' experiences of midwife specialists optimally utilising their knowledge and skills.

Setting: The context of the study is the public and private sectors of South Africa.

Methods: A qualitative, descriptive and contextual research design was employed. Six medico-legal experts identified through a snowball sampling technique participated in virtual, semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using Collaizi's descriptive method.

Results: Three themes with subthemes emerged. Results confirmed that medico-legal experts recognised the midwife specialists' expanded knowledge and skill set. The medico-legal experts experienced a disconnect between training regulations and the current practice regulations. Midwife specialists' practice was experienced as being guided by a moral obligation rather than prescribed regulations.

Conclusion: Midwife specialists are yet to receive full legal recognition in South Africa, challenging midwife specialists' assumption of autonomous and independent roles.

Contribution: Midwife specialists face potential risk of involvement in medical litigations under the current legislative framework. The findings of this study may guide the formulation of a scope of practice (SOP) that legally guides midwife specialists' practice in South Africa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health SA Gesondheid
Health SA Gesondheid HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
77
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信