南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省社区干旱风险管理的适应性机制。

IF 1.3 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jamba.v17i1.1757
Vuyiswa Khumalo, Hloniphani Moyo, Lutendo Mugwedi, Johanes Belle
{"title":"南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省社区干旱风险管理的适应性机制。","authors":"Vuyiswa Khumalo, Hloniphani Moyo, Lutendo Mugwedi, Johanes Belle","doi":"10.4102/jamba.v17i1.1757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Households in developing countries have established various informal mechanisms to cope with unanticipated disasters such as droughts. Understanding these strategies in the context of climate change will enhance the design of locally applicable adaptation mechanisms. This study aimed to investigate a South African rural community's adaptive mechanisms <i>during</i>- and <i>ex-post</i>-drought. Questionnaires were administered to 200 household heads, and five focus group discussions were held with selected community members. An index was computed to establish each adaptive mechanism's importance (termed the rank order) relative to its use in the study area. <i>During</i> droughts, borrowing from neighbours was the most commonly used mechanism by households with no savings, while sharecropping was the second most used mechanism. <i>Ex-post</i>-droughts, using savings was the primary strategy for community members who had savings, followed by seeking employment as the second most used strategy.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Findings from the study suggest that the community is highly vulnerable to droughts and disaster risks because of poor adaptive mechanisms, overreliance on water-dependent activities and lack of adequate support from different stakeholders. Community members use different mechanisms <i>during</i>- and <i>ex-post</i>-drought, depending on the stage or severity of the drought. The government and stakeholders should promote community awareness and early warning systems for droughts to mitigate disaster risks. These initiatives should ideally be combined with strengthening existing response measures and educating communities to adequately prepare for droughts and their aftermath.</p>","PeriodicalId":51823,"journal":{"name":"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"1757"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptive mechanisms to drought risk management in a KwaZulu-Natal community, South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Vuyiswa Khumalo, Hloniphani Moyo, Lutendo Mugwedi, Johanes Belle\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/jamba.v17i1.1757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Households in developing countries have established various informal mechanisms to cope with unanticipated disasters such as droughts. Understanding these strategies in the context of climate change will enhance the design of locally applicable adaptation mechanisms. This study aimed to investigate a South African rural community's adaptive mechanisms <i>during</i>- and <i>ex-post</i>-drought. Questionnaires were administered to 200 household heads, and five focus group discussions were held with selected community members. An index was computed to establish each adaptive mechanism's importance (termed the rank order) relative to its use in the study area. <i>During</i> droughts, borrowing from neighbours was the most commonly used mechanism by households with no savings, while sharecropping was the second most used mechanism. <i>Ex-post</i>-droughts, using savings was the primary strategy for community members who had savings, followed by seeking employment as the second most used strategy.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Findings from the study suggest that the community is highly vulnerable to droughts and disaster risks because of poor adaptive mechanisms, overreliance on water-dependent activities and lack of adequate support from different stakeholders. Community members use different mechanisms <i>during</i>- and <i>ex-post</i>-drought, depending on the stage or severity of the drought. The government and stakeholders should promote community awareness and early warning systems for droughts to mitigate disaster risks. These initiatives should ideally be combined with strengthening existing response measures and educating communities to adequately prepare for droughts and their aftermath.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"1757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067619/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v17i1.1757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v17i1.1757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发展中国家的家庭已经建立了各种非正式机制来应对诸如干旱之类的意外灾害。在气候变化背景下理解这些策略将有助于设计适合当地的适应机制。本研究旨在探讨南非农村社区在干旱期间和前后的适应机制。向200名户主发放了问卷,并与选定的社区成员进行了五次焦点小组讨论。计算了一个指数来确定每个适应机制的重要性(称为等级顺序)相对于其在研究区域的使用。在干旱期间,向邻居借钱是没有储蓄的家庭最常用的机制,而分成种植是第二常用的机制。干旱前后,利用储蓄是有储蓄的社区成员的主要战略,其次是寻找就业,这是第二常用的战略。贡献:该研究的结果表明,由于适应机制差、过度依赖依赖水的活动以及缺乏不同利益相关者的充分支持,该社区极易受到干旱和灾害风险的影响。社区成员在干旱期间和干旱后使用不同的机制,这取决于干旱的阶段或严重程度。政府和利益相关者应该提高社区对干旱的认识和早期预警系统,以减轻灾害风险。理想情况下,这些举措应与加强现有应对措施和教育社区为干旱及其后果做好充分准备相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adaptive mechanisms to drought risk management in a KwaZulu-Natal community, South Africa.

Households in developing countries have established various informal mechanisms to cope with unanticipated disasters such as droughts. Understanding these strategies in the context of climate change will enhance the design of locally applicable adaptation mechanisms. This study aimed to investigate a South African rural community's adaptive mechanisms during- and ex-post-drought. Questionnaires were administered to 200 household heads, and five focus group discussions were held with selected community members. An index was computed to establish each adaptive mechanism's importance (termed the rank order) relative to its use in the study area. During droughts, borrowing from neighbours was the most commonly used mechanism by households with no savings, while sharecropping was the second most used mechanism. Ex-post-droughts, using savings was the primary strategy for community members who had savings, followed by seeking employment as the second most used strategy.

Contribution: Findings from the study suggest that the community is highly vulnerable to droughts and disaster risks because of poor adaptive mechanisms, overreliance on water-dependent activities and lack of adequate support from different stakeholders. Community members use different mechanisms during- and ex-post-drought, depending on the stage or severity of the drought. The government and stakeholders should promote community awareness and early warning systems for droughts to mitigate disaster risks. These initiatives should ideally be combined with strengthening existing response measures and educating communities to adequately prepare for droughts and their aftermath.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信