人口健康需求评估和工具评估EuroQol数据(EQ-DAPHNIE):一项加强人口健康评估的研究。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jeffrey A Johnson, Mathieu F Janssen, Fatima Al Sayah, Henry Bailey, Mihir Gandhi, Dominik Golicki, Nils Gutacker, Erica Lubetkin, Brendan Mulhern, Fredrick Dermawan Purba, Juan M Ramos-Goñi, Desiree Scott, Hilary Short, Trudy Sullivan, Rosalie Viney, Zhihao Yang, Victor Zárate
{"title":"人口健康需求评估和工具评估EuroQol数据(EQ-DAPHNIE):一项加强人口健康评估的研究。","authors":"Jeffrey A Johnson, Mathieu F Janssen, Fatima Al Sayah, Henry Bailey, Mihir Gandhi, Dominik Golicki, Nils Gutacker, Erica Lubetkin, Brendan Mulhern, Fredrick Dermawan Purba, Juan M Ramos-Goñi, Desiree Scott, Hilary Short, Trudy Sullivan, Rosalie Viney, Zhihao Yang, Victor Zárate","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-03983-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Methods for collecting self-reported health status measures in population health surveys vary significantly across countries, presenting challenges to comparability. The EuroQol Data for Assessment of Population Health Needs and Instrument Evaluation (EQ-DAPHNIE) project aims to address this issue by developing infrastructure to generate representative datasets across multiple countries. This initiative aims to standardize data collection methodologies and to evaluate the performance of various health status measures, providing a foundation for reliable population health assessments. This paper describes the rationale, design and data collection methods for the EQ-DAPHNIE project.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>EQ-DAPHNIE employs a cross-sectional online survey design targeting the general adult population across various countries. Participants were recruited through an online panel provider. Each country had a target sample of 4500 responses, with quota sampling to ensure representativeness based on age, sex, income, region, and language. The survey collected comprehensive data on social determinants of health at both individual and neighbourhood levels. Participation was voluntary, and measures were taken to maintain data anonymity and ensure data quality through pre-testing and various quality assurance approaches.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The EQ-DAPHNIE project represents a significant advancement in generating large, representative, and comparable population health datasets across multiple countries. By employing precise sampling strategies, robust recruitment and data collection methods, and rigorous quality control measures, the project aims to provide a valuable resource for assessing and understanding population health and evaluating various health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and wellbeing instruments.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EuroQol data for assessment of population health needs and instrument evaluation (EQ-DAPHNIE): a study for enhancing population health assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey A Johnson, Mathieu F Janssen, Fatima Al Sayah, Henry Bailey, Mihir Gandhi, Dominik Golicki, Nils Gutacker, Erica Lubetkin, Brendan Mulhern, Fredrick Dermawan Purba, Juan M Ramos-Goñi, Desiree Scott, Hilary Short, Trudy Sullivan, Rosalie Viney, Zhihao Yang, Victor Zárate\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11136-025-03983-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Methods for collecting self-reported health status measures in population health surveys vary significantly across countries, presenting challenges to comparability. The EuroQol Data for Assessment of Population Health Needs and Instrument Evaluation (EQ-DAPHNIE) project aims to address this issue by developing infrastructure to generate representative datasets across multiple countries. This initiative aims to standardize data collection methodologies and to evaluate the performance of various health status measures, providing a foundation for reliable population health assessments. This paper describes the rationale, design and data collection methods for the EQ-DAPHNIE project.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>EQ-DAPHNIE employs a cross-sectional online survey design targeting the general adult population across various countries. Participants were recruited through an online panel provider. Each country had a target sample of 4500 responses, with quota sampling to ensure representativeness based on age, sex, income, region, and language. The survey collected comprehensive data on social determinants of health at both individual and neighbourhood levels. Participation was voluntary, and measures were taken to maintain data anonymity and ensure data quality through pre-testing and various quality assurance approaches.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The EQ-DAPHNIE project represents a significant advancement in generating large, representative, and comparable population health datasets across multiple countries. By employing precise sampling strategies, robust recruitment and data collection methods, and rigorous quality control measures, the project aims to provide a valuable resource for assessing and understanding population health and evaluating various health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and wellbeing instruments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-03983-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-03983-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在人口健康调查中收集自我报告的健康状况措施的方法在各国之间差异很大,对可比性提出了挑战。EuroQol人口健康需求评估和工具评估数据(EQ-DAPHNIE)项目旨在通过开发基础设施以生成跨多个国家的代表性数据集来解决这一问题。这一举措旨在使数据收集方法标准化,并评价各种健康状况措施的执行情况,为可靠的人口健康评估奠定基础。本文介绍了EQ-DAPHNIE项目的基本原理、设计和数据收集方法。方法/设计:EQ-DAPHNIE采用横断面在线调查设计,针对不同国家的普通成年人。参与者是通过在线小组提供商招募的。每个国家都有4500个目标样本,根据年龄、性别、收入、地区和语言进行配额抽样,以确保代表性。调查收集了关于个人和社区两级健康的社会决定因素的全面数据。参与是自愿的,并采取措施通过预测试和各种质量保证方法保持数据匿名和确保数据质量。讨论:EQ-DAPHNIE项目在生成跨多个国家的大型、代表性和可比较的人口健康数据集方面取得了重大进展。通过采用精确的抽样策略、稳健的招募和数据收集方法以及严格的质量控制措施,该项目旨在为评估和了解人口健康以及评估各种与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)和福祉工具提供宝贵资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EuroQol data for assessment of population health needs and instrument evaluation (EQ-DAPHNIE): a study for enhancing population health assessment.

Background: Methods for collecting self-reported health status measures in population health surveys vary significantly across countries, presenting challenges to comparability. The EuroQol Data for Assessment of Population Health Needs and Instrument Evaluation (EQ-DAPHNIE) project aims to address this issue by developing infrastructure to generate representative datasets across multiple countries. This initiative aims to standardize data collection methodologies and to evaluate the performance of various health status measures, providing a foundation for reliable population health assessments. This paper describes the rationale, design and data collection methods for the EQ-DAPHNIE project.

Methods/design: EQ-DAPHNIE employs a cross-sectional online survey design targeting the general adult population across various countries. Participants were recruited through an online panel provider. Each country had a target sample of 4500 responses, with quota sampling to ensure representativeness based on age, sex, income, region, and language. The survey collected comprehensive data on social determinants of health at both individual and neighbourhood levels. Participation was voluntary, and measures were taken to maintain data anonymity and ensure data quality through pre-testing and various quality assurance approaches.

Discussion: The EQ-DAPHNIE project represents a significant advancement in generating large, representative, and comparable population health datasets across multiple countries. By employing precise sampling strategies, robust recruitment and data collection methods, and rigorous quality control measures, the project aims to provide a valuable resource for assessing and understanding population health and evaluating various health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and wellbeing instruments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信