精氨酸刺激copeptin切断诊断AVP缺乏症(中枢性尿囊症)的事后内部验证。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Cihan Atila, Bettina Winzeler, Irina Chifu, Martin Fassnacht, Julie Refardt, Mirjam Christ-Crain
{"title":"精氨酸刺激copeptin切断诊断AVP缺乏症(中枢性尿囊症)的事后内部验证。","authors":"Cihan Atila, Bettina Winzeler, Irina Chifu, Martin Fassnacht, Julie Refardt, Mirjam Christ-Crain","doi":"10.1007/s11102-025-01523-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinguishing arginine vasopressin (AVP) deficiency (central diabetes insipidus) from primary polydipsia is challenging. While hypertonic saline-stimulated copeptin testing provides the highest diagnostic accuracy, it is often restricted to specialised centres, requiring close monitoring and potentially causing patient discomfort. Initially, arginine-stimulated copeptin was proposed as a simpler alternative, but a head-to-head comparison study found it less precise than hypertonic saline stimulation. However, the same study identified two new high sensitivity and specificity cut-offs for arginine-stimulated copeptin, though these cut-offs have yet to be validated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary post-hoc analysis of the initial prospective multicentre study, including adult patients with confirmed AVP deficiency or primary polydipsia. Participants underwent the arginine stimulation test, with plasma copeptin measured at baseline and 60- and 90 min after arginine infusion. The primary objective was to revisit the original study to internally validate the proposed arginine-stimulated copeptin cut-offs of > 5.2pmol/L (high specificity cut-off with > 90% specificity for primary polydipsia) and ≤ 3.0 pmol/L (high specificity cut-off with > 90% specificity for AVP deficiency).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In total, 96 patients were included between May 2013 and June 2018: n = 38 [40%] with AVP deficiency and n = 58 [60%] with primary polydipsia. At 60 min after arginine infusion, a copeptin level ≤ 3.0 pmol/L showed a specificity of 95% (95% CI: 0.88-1.00) for AVP deficiency, while a copeptin level > 5.2 pmol/L demonstrated a specificity of 97% (95% CI: 0.92-1.00) for primary polydipsia. The ≤ 3.0 pmol/L cut-off accurately identified 71% (n = 27/38) of patients with AVP deficiency, and the > 5.2 pmol/L cut-off correctly identified 69% (n = 40/58) of patients with primary polydipsia.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This analysis validates two new copeptin cut-offs of the arginine stimulation test to distinguish AVP deficiency from primary polydipsia: >5.2 pmol/L for high specificity in diagnosing primary polydipsia and ≤ 3.0 pmol/L for high specificity in diagnosing AVP deficiency. These thresholds might offer a practical initial alternative to hypertonic saline testing.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00757276).</p>","PeriodicalId":20202,"journal":{"name":"Pituitary","volume":"28 3","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12031852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A post-hoc internal validation of arginine-stimulated copeptin cut-offs for diagnosing AVP deficiency (central diabetes insipidus).\",\"authors\":\"Cihan Atila, Bettina Winzeler, Irina Chifu, Martin Fassnacht, Julie Refardt, Mirjam Christ-Crain\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11102-025-01523-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinguishing arginine vasopressin (AVP) deficiency (central diabetes insipidus) from primary polydipsia is challenging. While hypertonic saline-stimulated copeptin testing provides the highest diagnostic accuracy, it is often restricted to specialised centres, requiring close monitoring and potentially causing patient discomfort. Initially, arginine-stimulated copeptin was proposed as a simpler alternative, but a head-to-head comparison study found it less precise than hypertonic saline stimulation. However, the same study identified two new high sensitivity and specificity cut-offs for arginine-stimulated copeptin, though these cut-offs have yet to be validated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary post-hoc analysis of the initial prospective multicentre study, including adult patients with confirmed AVP deficiency or primary polydipsia. Participants underwent the arginine stimulation test, with plasma copeptin measured at baseline and 60- and 90 min after arginine infusion. The primary objective was to revisit the original study to internally validate the proposed arginine-stimulated copeptin cut-offs of > 5.2pmol/L (high specificity cut-off with > 90% specificity for primary polydipsia) and ≤ 3.0 pmol/L (high specificity cut-off with > 90% specificity for AVP deficiency).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In total, 96 patients were included between May 2013 and June 2018: n = 38 [40%] with AVP deficiency and n = 58 [60%] with primary polydipsia. At 60 min after arginine infusion, a copeptin level ≤ 3.0 pmol/L showed a specificity of 95% (95% CI: 0.88-1.00) for AVP deficiency, while a copeptin level > 5.2 pmol/L demonstrated a specificity of 97% (95% CI: 0.92-1.00) for primary polydipsia. The ≤ 3.0 pmol/L cut-off accurately identified 71% (n = 27/38) of patients with AVP deficiency, and the > 5.2 pmol/L cut-off correctly identified 69% (n = 40/58) of patients with primary polydipsia.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This analysis validates two new copeptin cut-offs of the arginine stimulation test to distinguish AVP deficiency from primary polydipsia: >5.2 pmol/L for high specificity in diagnosing primary polydipsia and ≤ 3.0 pmol/L for high specificity in diagnosing AVP deficiency. These thresholds might offer a practical initial alternative to hypertonic saline testing.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00757276).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pituitary\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12031852/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pituitary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-025-01523-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pituitary","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-025-01523-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:区分精氨酸抗利尿激素(AVP)缺乏症(中枢性尿囊症)和原发性多饮是具有挑战性的。虽然高渗盐刺激copeptin测试提供了最高的诊断准确性,但它通常仅限于专门的中心,需要密切监测并可能引起患者不适。最初,精氨酸刺激的copeptin被认为是一种更简单的替代方法,但一项头部对头部的比较研究发现,它不如高渗盐水刺激精确。然而,同样的研究确定了精氨酸刺激copeptin的两个新的高灵敏度和特异性切断,尽管这些切断尚未得到验证。方法:这是对最初的前瞻性多中心研究的二次事后分析,包括确诊AVP缺乏或原发性多饮的成年患者。参与者进行精氨酸刺激试验,在基线和精氨酸输注后60和90分钟测量血浆copeptin。主要目的是重新审视原始研究,以内部验证提出的精氨酸刺激的copeptin截断值为> 5.2pmol/L(> 90%特异性的原发性烦渴)和≤3.0 pmol/L(> 90%特异性的AVP缺乏症的高特异性截断值)。结果:2013年5月至2018年6月共纳入96例患者:n = 38 (40%) AVP缺乏症患者和n = 58(60%)原发性烦渴症患者。精氨酸输注后60 min, copeptin水平≤3.0 pmol/L对AVP缺乏症的特异性为95% (95% CI: 0.88-1.00), copeptin水平≤5.2 pmol/L对原发性渴渴症的特异性为97% (95% CI: 0.92-1.00)。≤3.0 pmol/L的临界值准确识别了71% (n = 27/38)的AVP缺乏症患者,而≤5.2 pmol/L的临界值准确识别了69% (n = 40/58)的原发性多饮患者。解释:本分析验证了精氨酸刺激试验区分AVP缺乏症和原发性烦渴的两个新的copeptin临界值:>为5.2 pmol/L,诊断原发性烦渴的特异性高;≤3.0 pmol/L,诊断AVP缺乏症的特异性高。这些阈值可能为高渗盐水试验提供实用的初步替代方案。注册:Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00757276)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A post-hoc internal validation of arginine-stimulated copeptin cut-offs for diagnosing AVP deficiency (central diabetes insipidus).

Background: Distinguishing arginine vasopressin (AVP) deficiency (central diabetes insipidus) from primary polydipsia is challenging. While hypertonic saline-stimulated copeptin testing provides the highest diagnostic accuracy, it is often restricted to specialised centres, requiring close monitoring and potentially causing patient discomfort. Initially, arginine-stimulated copeptin was proposed as a simpler alternative, but a head-to-head comparison study found it less precise than hypertonic saline stimulation. However, the same study identified two new high sensitivity and specificity cut-offs for arginine-stimulated copeptin, though these cut-offs have yet to be validated.

Methods: This is a secondary post-hoc analysis of the initial prospective multicentre study, including adult patients with confirmed AVP deficiency or primary polydipsia. Participants underwent the arginine stimulation test, with plasma copeptin measured at baseline and 60- and 90 min after arginine infusion. The primary objective was to revisit the original study to internally validate the proposed arginine-stimulated copeptin cut-offs of > 5.2pmol/L (high specificity cut-off with > 90% specificity for primary polydipsia) and ≤ 3.0 pmol/L (high specificity cut-off with > 90% specificity for AVP deficiency).

Findings: In total, 96 patients were included between May 2013 and June 2018: n = 38 [40%] with AVP deficiency and n = 58 [60%] with primary polydipsia. At 60 min after arginine infusion, a copeptin level ≤ 3.0 pmol/L showed a specificity of 95% (95% CI: 0.88-1.00) for AVP deficiency, while a copeptin level > 5.2 pmol/L demonstrated a specificity of 97% (95% CI: 0.92-1.00) for primary polydipsia. The ≤ 3.0 pmol/L cut-off accurately identified 71% (n = 27/38) of patients with AVP deficiency, and the > 5.2 pmol/L cut-off correctly identified 69% (n = 40/58) of patients with primary polydipsia.

Interpretation: This analysis validates two new copeptin cut-offs of the arginine stimulation test to distinguish AVP deficiency from primary polydipsia: >5.2 pmol/L for high specificity in diagnosing primary polydipsia and ≤ 3.0 pmol/L for high specificity in diagnosing AVP deficiency. These thresholds might offer a practical initial alternative to hypertonic saline testing.

Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00757276).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pituitary
Pituitary 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Pituitary is an international publication devoted to basic and clinical aspects of the pituitary gland. It is designed to publish original, high quality research in both basic and pituitary function as well as clinical pituitary disease. The journal considers: Biology of Pituitary Tumors Mechanisms of Pituitary Hormone Secretion Regulation of Pituitary Function Prospective Clinical Studies of Pituitary Disease Critical Basic and Clinical Reviews Pituitary is directed at basic investigators, physiologists, clinical adult and pediatric endocrinologists, neurosurgeons and reproductive endocrinologists interested in the broad field of the pituitary and its disorders. The Editorial Board has been drawn from international experts in basic and clinical endocrinology. The journal offers a rapid turnaround time for review of manuscripts, and the high standard of the journal is maintained by a selective peer-review process which aims to publish only the highest quality manuscripts. Pituitary will foster the publication of creative scholarship as it pertains to the pituitary and will provide a forum for basic scientists and clinicians to publish their high quality pituitary-related work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信