正常循环停止伴顺行脑灌注治疗A型主动脉夹层。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Laura Rings, Rasha Boulos, Vasileios Ntinopoulos, Achim Haeussler, Hector Rodriguez Cetina Biefer, Omer Dzemali
{"title":"正常循环停止伴顺行脑灌注治疗A型主动脉夹层。","authors":"Laura Rings, Rasha Boulos, Vasileios Ntinopoulos, Achim Haeussler, Hector Rodriguez Cetina Biefer, Omer Dzemali","doi":"10.1055/a-2576-7627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest is the standard approach for the surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of normothermic circulatory arrest using antegrade cerebral perfusion as an alternative technique.A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis was conducted on patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection between 2007 and 2023 at a single center. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent normothermic (>35°C) versus mild hypothermic (28-34°C) circulatory arrest. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality, new neurological deficits, and the intraoperative and postoperative parameters.After propensity score matching, 20 pairs were analyzed. The normothermic group (NTCA) had significantly shorter aortic cross-clamp times (47.5 vs. 66.5 minutes, <i>p</i> = 0.013) and trends toward shorter cardiopulmonary bypass times (68 vs. 95 minutes, <i>p</i> = 0.066), ICU stays (4.5 vs. 5 days, <i>p</i> = 0.4), and intubation times (6 vs. 8 hours, <i>p</i> = 0.4). There were no significant differences in new neurological deficits (<i>n</i> = 6 [NTCA] vs. 4, <i>p</i> = 0.7), delirium (<i>n</i> = 5 [NTCA] vs. 6, <i>p</i> = 0.6), or mortality (<i>n</i> = 1 [NTCA] vs. 3, <i>p</i> = 0.6) between the groups. The normothermic group required less prothrombin complex concentrate (<i>p</i> = 0.0012).In this pilot study, NTCA with antegrade cerebral perfusion appears feasible and safe for hemiarch repair in acute type A aortic dissection, with potential benefits of shorter operative times and improved coagulation profiles compared with mild hypothermia. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normothermic Circulatory Arrest with Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion for Type A Aortic Dissection.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Rings, Rasha Boulos, Vasileios Ntinopoulos, Achim Haeussler, Hector Rodriguez Cetina Biefer, Omer Dzemali\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2576-7627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest is the standard approach for the surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of normothermic circulatory arrest using antegrade cerebral perfusion as an alternative technique.A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis was conducted on patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection between 2007 and 2023 at a single center. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent normothermic (>35°C) versus mild hypothermic (28-34°C) circulatory arrest. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality, new neurological deficits, and the intraoperative and postoperative parameters.After propensity score matching, 20 pairs were analyzed. The normothermic group (NTCA) had significantly shorter aortic cross-clamp times (47.5 vs. 66.5 minutes, <i>p</i> = 0.013) and trends toward shorter cardiopulmonary bypass times (68 vs. 95 minutes, <i>p</i> = 0.066), ICU stays (4.5 vs. 5 days, <i>p</i> = 0.4), and intubation times (6 vs. 8 hours, <i>p</i> = 0.4). There were no significant differences in new neurological deficits (<i>n</i> = 6 [NTCA] vs. 4, <i>p</i> = 0.7), delirium (<i>n</i> = 5 [NTCA] vs. 6, <i>p</i> = 0.6), or mortality (<i>n</i> = 1 [NTCA] vs. 3, <i>p</i> = 0.6) between the groups. The normothermic group required less prothrombin complex concentrate (<i>p</i> = 0.0012).In this pilot study, NTCA with antegrade cerebral perfusion appears feasible and safe for hemiarch repair in acute type A aortic dissection, with potential benefits of shorter operative times and improved coagulation profiles compared with mild hypothermia. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2576-7627\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2576-7627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深低温循环停搏是急性A型主动脉夹层手术修复的标准方法。本研究旨在评估将顺行脑灌注作为一种替代技术进行常温循环骤停的可行性和结果。回顾性倾向评分匹配分析对2007年至2023年间在单一中心接受急性A型主动脉夹层手术的患者进行了分析。结果比较了接受常温(bb0 - 35°C)和轻度低温(28-34°C)循环停止的患者。主要结果为30天死亡率、新的神经功能缺损、术中和术后参数。倾向评分匹配后,对20对进行分析。常温组(NTCA)的主动脉交叉夹夹时间明显缩短(47.5 vs 66.5分钟,p = 0.013),体外循环时间(68 vs 95分钟,p = 0.066)、ICU住院时间(4.5 vs 5天,p = 0.4)和插管时间(6 vs 8小时,p = 0.4)也有缩短的趋势。两组间在新发神经功能缺损(n = 6 [NTCA] vs. 4, p = 0.7)、谵妄(n = 5 [NTCA] vs. 6, p = 0.6)或死亡率(n = 1 [NTCA] vs. 3, p = 0.6)方面无显著差异。常温组所需凝血酶原复合物浓缩物较少(p = 0.0012)。在这项初步研究中,NTCA伴顺行脑灌注对急性A型主动脉夹层的血腔修复似乎是可行和安全的,与亚低温相比,具有缩短手术时间和改善凝血状况的潜在益处。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Normothermic Circulatory Arrest with Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion for Type A Aortic Dissection.

Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest is the standard approach for the surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of normothermic circulatory arrest using antegrade cerebral perfusion as an alternative technique.A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis was conducted on patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection between 2007 and 2023 at a single center. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent normothermic (>35°C) versus mild hypothermic (28-34°C) circulatory arrest. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality, new neurological deficits, and the intraoperative and postoperative parameters.After propensity score matching, 20 pairs were analyzed. The normothermic group (NTCA) had significantly shorter aortic cross-clamp times (47.5 vs. 66.5 minutes, p = 0.013) and trends toward shorter cardiopulmonary bypass times (68 vs. 95 minutes, p = 0.066), ICU stays (4.5 vs. 5 days, p = 0.4), and intubation times (6 vs. 8 hours, p = 0.4). There were no significant differences in new neurological deficits (n = 6 [NTCA] vs. 4, p = 0.7), delirium (n = 5 [NTCA] vs. 6, p = 0.6), or mortality (n = 1 [NTCA] vs. 3, p = 0.6) between the groups. The normothermic group required less prothrombin complex concentrate (p = 0.0012).In this pilot study, NTCA with antegrade cerebral perfusion appears feasible and safe for hemiarch repair in acute type A aortic dissection, with potential benefits of shorter operative times and improved coagulation profiles compared with mild hypothermia. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon publishes articles of the highest standard from internationally recognized thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, physiologists, and pathologists. This journal is an essential resource for anyone working in this field. Original articles, short communications, reviews and important meeting announcements keep you abreast of key clinical advances, as well as providing the theoretical background of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. Case reports are published in our Open Access companion journal The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信