小梁切除术中给予丝裂霉素C的方法比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Alessandro Ghirardi MD , Siqi Fan MD , Karl Mercieca MD, FRCOphth , Gianni Virgili MD , Stefano De Cillà MD , Alessandro Rabiolo MD
{"title":"小梁切除术中给予丝裂霉素C的方法比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Alessandro Ghirardi MD ,&nbsp;Siqi Fan MD ,&nbsp;Karl Mercieca MD, FRCOphth ,&nbsp;Gianni Virgili MD ,&nbsp;Stefano De Cillà MD ,&nbsp;Alessandro Rabiolo MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Topic</h3><div>Compare different methods to deliver mitomycin<span> C (MMC) in trabeculectomy surgery.</span></div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>Knowing the best way to apply MMC may provide guidance to glaucoma surgeons and improve outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>Systematic review<span> and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023394371) for studies comparing ≥ 2 methods to apply MMC in trabeculectomy published until February 22, 2023, from Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), quasi-randomized, and prospective nonrandomized controlled studies published in English and conducted on human subjects were included. The primary outcome was surgical failure at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included </span></span>intraocular pressure<span> (IOP), number of glaucoma medications<span>, postoperative complications, and interventions. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for ≥ 3 studies, whereas a fixed-effect model was used for 2 studies. The certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) score.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 7899 records, 8 articles from 7 RCTs compared intraoperative sub-Tenon MMC injection (315 participants) and intraoperative MMC-soaked sponges (327 participants). One RCT and 1 quasi-randomized study compared postoperative (60 participants) and intraoperative (60 participants) MMC-soaked sponge application. In the injection vs. sponges comparison, no significant difference in surgical failure (relative risk [RR]: 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48–1.28; <em>P</em> = 0.33, GRADE score moderate) or IOP (mean difference [MD]: −0.85 mmHg, 95% CI: −2.19 to 0.49; <em>P</em> = 0.21, GRADE score moderate) was found at 1 year. Sub-Tenon injection resulted in fewer postoperative medications (MD: −0.40, 95% CI: −0.63 to −0.18; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; GRADE score moderate) and better bleb morphology (GRADE score high) in terms of height (MD: −0.39, 95% CI: −0.61 to −0.18; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), extension (MD: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.11–0.45; <em>P</em><span> = 0.001), and vascularity (MD: −0.52, 95% CI: −0.72, −0.31; </span><em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) than sponges. Serious complication and reintervention rates were low and comparable between groups. We did not perform a meta-analysis comparing postoperative and intraoperative sponge application because of heterogeneity in the study designs of the included studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Intraoperative sub-Tenon MMC injection is noninferior to intraoperative MMC-soaked sponges in trabeculectomy surgery in terms of surgical failure and IOP control, with a reduced number of medications, improved bleb morphology, and similar safety profile. Further research with a long-term follow-up is necessary to confirm their long-term equivalence.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19519,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":"8 5","pages":"Pages 503-514"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Methods to Deliver Mitomycin C in Trabeculectomy Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Ghirardi MD ,&nbsp;Siqi Fan MD ,&nbsp;Karl Mercieca MD, FRCOphth ,&nbsp;Gianni Virgili MD ,&nbsp;Stefano De Cillà MD ,&nbsp;Alessandro Rabiolo MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ogla.2025.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Topic</h3><div>Compare different methods to deliver mitomycin<span> C (MMC) in trabeculectomy surgery.</span></div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>Knowing the best way to apply MMC may provide guidance to glaucoma surgeons and improve outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>Systematic review<span> and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023394371) for studies comparing ≥ 2 methods to apply MMC in trabeculectomy published until February 22, 2023, from Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), quasi-randomized, and prospective nonrandomized controlled studies published in English and conducted on human subjects were included. The primary outcome was surgical failure at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included </span></span>intraocular pressure<span> (IOP), number of glaucoma medications<span>, postoperative complications, and interventions. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for ≥ 3 studies, whereas a fixed-effect model was used for 2 studies. The certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) score.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 7899 records, 8 articles from 7 RCTs compared intraoperative sub-Tenon MMC injection (315 participants) and intraoperative MMC-soaked sponges (327 participants). One RCT and 1 quasi-randomized study compared postoperative (60 participants) and intraoperative (60 participants) MMC-soaked sponge application. In the injection vs. sponges comparison, no significant difference in surgical failure (relative risk [RR]: 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48–1.28; <em>P</em> = 0.33, GRADE score moderate) or IOP (mean difference [MD]: −0.85 mmHg, 95% CI: −2.19 to 0.49; <em>P</em> = 0.21, GRADE score moderate) was found at 1 year. Sub-Tenon injection resulted in fewer postoperative medications (MD: −0.40, 95% CI: −0.63 to −0.18; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; GRADE score moderate) and better bleb morphology (GRADE score high) in terms of height (MD: −0.39, 95% CI: −0.61 to −0.18; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), extension (MD: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.11–0.45; <em>P</em><span> = 0.001), and vascularity (MD: −0.52, 95% CI: −0.72, −0.31; </span><em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) than sponges. Serious complication and reintervention rates were low and comparable between groups. We did not perform a meta-analysis comparing postoperative and intraoperative sponge application because of heterogeneity in the study designs of the included studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Intraoperative sub-Tenon MMC injection is noninferior to intraoperative MMC-soaked sponges in trabeculectomy surgery in terms of surgical failure and IOP control, with a reduced number of medications, improved bleb morphology, and similar safety profile. Further research with a long-term follow-up is necessary to confirm their long-term equivalence.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma\",\"volume\":\"8 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 503-514\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419625000729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419625000729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

题目:比较小梁切除术中不同方法给药丝裂霉素C (MMC)。临床意义:了解应用MMC的最佳方法可以为青光眼外科医生提供指导并改善预后。方法:系统回顾和荟萃分析(PROSPERO CRD42023394371)对截至2023年2月22日发表于Medline、EMBASE和CENTRAL的比较≥2种方法应用MMC的小梁切除术的研究。随机临床试验(rct)、准随机和前瞻性非随机对照研究均以英文发表,并在人类受试者中进行。主要结果为手术失败。次要结局包括眼内压(IOP)、青光眼药物数量、术后并发症和干预措施。采用ROB2.0和ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。≥3项研究采用随机效应荟萃分析,2项研究采用固定效应模型。证据的确定性以GRADE评分评估。结果:从7899份记录中,来自7项随机对照试验的8篇文章比较了术中亚腱MMC注射(315名受试者)和术中MMC浸泡海绵(327名受试者)。一项RCT和一项准随机研究比较了术后(60名参与者)和术中(60名参与者)mmc浸泡海绵的应用。在注射与海绵的比较中,手术失败无显著差异(相对危险度[RR]: 0.78, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.48, 1.28;p=0.33, GRADE评分中等)或IOP(平均差[MD]: -0.85 mmHg, 95%CI: -2.19, 0.49;p=0.21, GRADE评分中等)。亚腱注射减少了术后用药(MD: -0.40, 95%CI: -0.63, -0.18;结论:在小梁切除术中,术中亚tenon MMC注射与术中MMC浸泡海绵相比,在手术失败和IOP控制方面不差于术中MMC浸泡海绵,用药次数减少,水泡形态改善,安全性相似。需要进一步的长期随访研究来证实它们的长期等效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Methods to Deliver Mitomycin C in Trabeculectomy Surgery

Topic

Compare different methods to deliver mitomycin C (MMC) in trabeculectomy surgery.

Clinical Relevance

Knowing the best way to apply MMC may provide guidance to glaucoma surgeons and improve outcomes.

Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023394371) for studies comparing ≥ 2 methods to apply MMC in trabeculectomy published until February 22, 2023, from Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), quasi-randomized, and prospective nonrandomized controlled studies published in English and conducted on human subjects were included. The primary outcome was surgical failure at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, postoperative complications, and interventions. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for ≥ 3 studies, whereas a fixed-effect model was used for 2 studies. The certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) score.

Results

From 7899 records, 8 articles from 7 RCTs compared intraoperative sub-Tenon MMC injection (315 participants) and intraoperative MMC-soaked sponges (327 participants). One RCT and 1 quasi-randomized study compared postoperative (60 participants) and intraoperative (60 participants) MMC-soaked sponge application. In the injection vs. sponges comparison, no significant difference in surgical failure (relative risk [RR]: 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48–1.28; P = 0.33, GRADE score moderate) or IOP (mean difference [MD]: −0.85 mmHg, 95% CI: −2.19 to 0.49; P = 0.21, GRADE score moderate) was found at 1 year. Sub-Tenon injection resulted in fewer postoperative medications (MD: −0.40, 95% CI: −0.63 to −0.18; P < 0.001; GRADE score moderate) and better bleb morphology (GRADE score high) in terms of height (MD: −0.39, 95% CI: −0.61 to −0.18; P < 0.001), extension (MD: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.11–0.45; P = 0.001), and vascularity (MD: −0.52, 95% CI: −0.72, −0.31; P < 0.001) than sponges. Serious complication and reintervention rates were low and comparable between groups. We did not perform a meta-analysis comparing postoperative and intraoperative sponge application because of heterogeneity in the study designs of the included studies.

Conclusions

Intraoperative sub-Tenon MMC injection is noninferior to intraoperative MMC-soaked sponges in trabeculectomy surgery in terms of surgical failure and IOP control, with a reduced number of medications, improved bleb morphology, and similar safety profile. Further research with a long-term follow-up is necessary to confirm their long-term equivalence.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
46 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信