评估各种固定手术器械的方法,有限元分析。

Q3 Medicine
Hamid Namazi, Mohammad Taghi Karimi, Mohammad Amin Mahdiyar
{"title":"评估各种固定手术器械的方法,有限元分析。","authors":"Hamid Namazi, Mohammad Taghi Karimi, Mohammad Amin Mahdiyar","doi":"10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2310-1676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with Lunotriquetral Interosseous Ligament (LTIL) injuries often experience wrist pain and carpal instability, resulting in challenging treatment. The optimal surgical approach has to be determined for addressing this condition.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study aimed to assess the postoperative outcomes of orthopedic devices in lunotriquetral fixation using a 3D model.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This computer simulation study aimed to develop a three-dimensional model of a normal wrist joint. The study then simulated LTIL tears and compared three surgical methods for fusing the lunate and triquetrum bones using a pin, a screw, and a combination of both.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on normal mechanistic behavior in terms of anteroposterior and mediolateral displacement of the lunate bone, the results are presented. However, the use of pin-fixation is significantly superior to the other methods with a displacement of 1.65 and 1.47 mm in fixation versus 0.32 and 0.64 mm in normal anatomy. This approach also significantly decreased the stress on the lunate bone and showed the least stress on the orthopedic device compared to other surgical approaches. For the triquetrum bone, pin fixation proved superior in controlling anteroposterior and vertical motions. This method also imposed significantly less stress on the triquetrum compared to using a screw or double instrumentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lunotriquetral fusion can be achieved using a pin, which provides better results than fusion with a screw or the combined use of a screw and pin.</p>","PeriodicalId":38035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering","volume":"15 2","pages":"167-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Various Methods of Lunotriquetral Stabilization Surgical Producers, A Finite Element Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hamid Namazi, Mohammad Taghi Karimi, Mohammad Amin Mahdiyar\",\"doi\":\"10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2310-1676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with Lunotriquetral Interosseous Ligament (LTIL) injuries often experience wrist pain and carpal instability, resulting in challenging treatment. The optimal surgical approach has to be determined for addressing this condition.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study aimed to assess the postoperative outcomes of orthopedic devices in lunotriquetral fixation using a 3D model.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This computer simulation study aimed to develop a three-dimensional model of a normal wrist joint. The study then simulated LTIL tears and compared three surgical methods for fusing the lunate and triquetrum bones using a pin, a screw, and a combination of both.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on normal mechanistic behavior in terms of anteroposterior and mediolateral displacement of the lunate bone, the results are presented. However, the use of pin-fixation is significantly superior to the other methods with a displacement of 1.65 and 1.47 mm in fixation versus 0.32 and 0.64 mm in normal anatomy. This approach also significantly decreased the stress on the lunate bone and showed the least stress on the orthopedic device compared to other surgical approaches. For the triquetrum bone, pin fixation proved superior in controlling anteroposterior and vertical motions. This method also imposed significantly less stress on the triquetrum compared to using a screw or double instrumentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lunotriquetral fusion can be achieved using a pin, which provides better results than fusion with a screw or the combined use of a screw and pin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"167-172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009470/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2310-1676\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2310-1676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腰三骨间韧带(LTIL)损伤的患者通常会出现腕关节疼痛和腕关节不稳定,导致治疗困难。必须确定最佳的手术方法来解决这种情况。目的:本研究旨在利用三维模型评估骨科器械在腰椎三突固定中的术后效果。材料和方法:本计算机模拟研究旨在建立一个正常腕关节的三维模型。该研究随后模拟了LTIL撕裂,并比较了使用针、螺钉和两者结合的三种融合月骨和三骨的手术方法。结果:根据正常的力学行为,在前后和中外侧移位的月骨,结果提出。然而,使用针内固定明显优于其他方法,固定位移为1.65和1.47 mm,而正常解剖为0.32和0.64 mm。与其他手术入路相比,该入路还显著减少了月骨上的应力,并且显示了对矫形装置的最小应力。对于三叉骨,针固定在控制前后和垂直运动方面被证明是优越的。与使用螺钉或双内固定相比,这种方法对三口器施加的压力也显著减少。结论:椎弓根钉可实现椎弓根三方融合,其效果优于螺钉融合或螺钉与椎弓根钉联合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Various Methods of Lunotriquetral Stabilization Surgical Producers, A Finite Element Analysis.

Background: Patients with Lunotriquetral Interosseous Ligament (LTIL) injuries often experience wrist pain and carpal instability, resulting in challenging treatment. The optimal surgical approach has to be determined for addressing this condition.

Objective: The current study aimed to assess the postoperative outcomes of orthopedic devices in lunotriquetral fixation using a 3D model.

Material and methods: This computer simulation study aimed to develop a three-dimensional model of a normal wrist joint. The study then simulated LTIL tears and compared three surgical methods for fusing the lunate and triquetrum bones using a pin, a screw, and a combination of both.

Results: Based on normal mechanistic behavior in terms of anteroposterior and mediolateral displacement of the lunate bone, the results are presented. However, the use of pin-fixation is significantly superior to the other methods with a displacement of 1.65 and 1.47 mm in fixation versus 0.32 and 0.64 mm in normal anatomy. This approach also significantly decreased the stress on the lunate bone and showed the least stress on the orthopedic device compared to other surgical approaches. For the triquetrum bone, pin fixation proved superior in controlling anteroposterior and vertical motions. This method also imposed significantly less stress on the triquetrum compared to using a screw or double instrumentation.

Conclusion: Lunotriquetral fusion can be achieved using a pin, which provides better results than fusion with a screw or the combined use of a screw and pin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering (JBPE) is a bimonthly peer-reviewed English-language journal that publishes high-quality basic sciences and clinical research (experimental or theoretical) broadly concerned with the relationship of physics to medicine and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信