全球南方和北方与狼疮诊断和治疗延误相关的障碍和促进因素:对定性和混合方法研究的系统回顾。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Amaranta Manrique de Lara, Tirsa Colmenares-Roa, Laura Athié, Yurilis Fuentes-Silva, Cinthya Cadena-Trejo, María Fernanda Ramírez-Flores, Alfonso Gastelum-Strozzi, Rosana Quintana, Bernardo A Pons-Estel, Ingris Peláez-Ballestas
{"title":"全球南方和北方与狼疮诊断和治疗延误相关的障碍和促进因素:对定性和混合方法研究的系统回顾。","authors":"Amaranta Manrique de Lara, Tirsa Colmenares-Roa, Laura Athié, Yurilis Fuentes-Silva, Cinthya Cadena-Trejo, María Fernanda Ramírez-Flores, Alfonso Gastelum-Strozzi, Rosana Quintana, Bernardo A Pons-Estel, Ingris Peláez-Ballestas","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05875-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, there is no specific definition of delay in the diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. This study aimed to describe the experiences of diagnostic and treatment delays in lupus, along with their associated barriers and facilitators, and to contrast this phenomenon in the Global South and North. A qualitative systematic review of the literature was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA guidelines. A targeted electronic search strategy was performed in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. This protocol was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023456508). From 1,135 identified registries, 12 (ten qualitative and two mixed methods) articles were included in the analysis, most from the Global North. None of the publications clearly define diagnostic delay in lupus. Patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals identified a range of barriers and facilitators. Misdiagnosis, miscommunication, the lack of rheumatology knowledge and education, and the diagnostic pilgrimage were barriers reported in both regions. In the Global South, barriers were related to a fragmented and complex healthcare system, stigma, and economic and geographic difficulties. In the Global North, physician-patient interactions and reliance on antinuclear antibody testing were significant barriers. The reported facilitators mostly comprised individual-level factors like self-care and resilience. This review highlights the lack of a clear definition of diagnostic and treatment delays in lupus, integrating the perspectives of patients, family and caregivers, and healthcare providers. The contrasting emphasis on external context factors in the Global South may reflect underlying health inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 5","pages":"121"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators associated with diagnostic and treatment delays in lupus in the Global South and North: a systematic review of qualitative and mixed methods studies.\",\"authors\":\"Amaranta Manrique de Lara, Tirsa Colmenares-Roa, Laura Athié, Yurilis Fuentes-Silva, Cinthya Cadena-Trejo, María Fernanda Ramírez-Flores, Alfonso Gastelum-Strozzi, Rosana Quintana, Bernardo A Pons-Estel, Ingris Peláez-Ballestas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00296-025-05875-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Currently, there is no specific definition of delay in the diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. This study aimed to describe the experiences of diagnostic and treatment delays in lupus, along with their associated barriers and facilitators, and to contrast this phenomenon in the Global South and North. A qualitative systematic review of the literature was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA guidelines. A targeted electronic search strategy was performed in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. This protocol was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023456508). From 1,135 identified registries, 12 (ten qualitative and two mixed methods) articles were included in the analysis, most from the Global North. None of the publications clearly define diagnostic delay in lupus. Patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals identified a range of barriers and facilitators. Misdiagnosis, miscommunication, the lack of rheumatology knowledge and education, and the diagnostic pilgrimage were barriers reported in both regions. In the Global South, barriers were related to a fragmented and complex healthcare system, stigma, and economic and geographic difficulties. In the Global North, physician-patient interactions and reliance on antinuclear antibody testing were significant barriers. The reported facilitators mostly comprised individual-level factors like self-care and resilience. This review highlights the lack of a clear definition of diagnostic and treatment delays in lupus, integrating the perspectives of patients, family and caregivers, and healthcare providers. The contrasting emphasis on external context factors in the Global South may reflect underlying health inequalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"volume\":\"45 5\",\"pages\":\"121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05875-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05875-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,对于系统性红斑狼疮的诊断和治疗延迟并没有具体的定义。本研究旨在描述狼疮诊断和治疗延迟的经历,以及相关的障碍和促进因素,并对比全球南方和北方的这一现象。根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所和PRISMA指南,对文献进行了定性系统回顾。在Scopus、PubMed和Web of Science中执行了有针对性的电子搜索策略。该方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO CRD42023456508)中注册。从1135个已确定的注册中心中,有12篇(10篇定性方法和2篇混合方法)文章被纳入分析,其中大部分来自全球北方。没有出版物明确定义狼疮的诊断延迟。患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员确定了一系列障碍和促进因素。误诊、沟通不畅、风湿病知识和教育的缺乏以及诊断朝圣是这两个地区报告的障碍。在全球南方,障碍与支离破碎和复杂的医疗保健系统、耻辱以及经济和地理困难有关。在全球北方,医患互动和对抗核抗体检测的依赖是重大障碍。报告的促进因素主要包括个人层面的因素,如自我照顾和恢复力。这篇综述强调了狼疮的诊断和治疗延迟缺乏明确的定义,整合了患者、家庭和照顾者以及医疗保健提供者的观点。全球南方对外部环境因素的对比强调可能反映了潜在的保健不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and facilitators associated with diagnostic and treatment delays in lupus in the Global South and North: a systematic review of qualitative and mixed methods studies.

Currently, there is no specific definition of delay in the diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. This study aimed to describe the experiences of diagnostic and treatment delays in lupus, along with their associated barriers and facilitators, and to contrast this phenomenon in the Global South and North. A qualitative systematic review of the literature was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA guidelines. A targeted electronic search strategy was performed in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. This protocol was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023456508). From 1,135 identified registries, 12 (ten qualitative and two mixed methods) articles were included in the analysis, most from the Global North. None of the publications clearly define diagnostic delay in lupus. Patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals identified a range of barriers and facilitators. Misdiagnosis, miscommunication, the lack of rheumatology knowledge and education, and the diagnostic pilgrimage were barriers reported in both regions. In the Global South, barriers were related to a fragmented and complex healthcare system, stigma, and economic and geographic difficulties. In the Global North, physician-patient interactions and reliance on antinuclear antibody testing were significant barriers. The reported facilitators mostly comprised individual-level factors like self-care and resilience. This review highlights the lack of a clear definition of diagnostic and treatment delays in lupus, integrating the perspectives of patients, family and caregivers, and healthcare providers. The contrasting emphasis on external context factors in the Global South may reflect underlying health inequalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信