评估跨学科言语降级与内隐偏见检查训练在急诊科躁动管理中的可行性与有效性。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S513026
Jossie A Carreras Tartak, Giovanni Rodriguez, Madeline Schwid, Melissa A Meeker, Matthew D Thomas, Harold J Roy, Farah Z Dadabhoy, Melanie Molina, Anita Chary, Alice K Bukhman, Dana D Im, Elizabeth S Temin, Wendy L Macias-Konstantopoulos
{"title":"评估跨学科言语降级与内隐偏见检查训练在急诊科躁动管理中的可行性与有效性。","authors":"Jossie A Carreras Tartak, Giovanni Rodriguez, Madeline Schwid, Melissa A Meeker, Matthew D Thomas, Harold J Roy, Farah Z Dadabhoy, Melanie Molina, Anita Chary, Alice K Bukhman, Dana D Im, Elizabeth S Temin, Wendy L Macias-Konstantopoulos","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S513026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recent scholarship has revealed racial disparities in emergency department (ED) physical restraint use in agitation management. We implemented an interdisciplinary educational program that integrates discussions about the role of bias in physical restraint use with workplace violence (WPV) prevention strategies to increase awareness of implicit bias and comfort with verbal de-escalation among ED staff.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In partnership with hospital security at a large urban academic medical center, we developed a 1-hour online WPV prerequisite course followed by a 2-hour multi-modal, in-person training consisting of 40 minutes each of didactics, an interactive defensive skills workshop, and case-based simulations with structured debriefings. From September 2022 to June 2023, all patient-facing ED staff were invited to participate and received a $100 gift card for program completion. Participants rated their confidence and comfort in various aspects of agitation management on a 5-point Likert scale before and immediately after via pre- and post-training surveys. Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were employed for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 91 participants, 72 (79%) completed the pre- and post-training surveys. Representing a wide range of ED role groups, 74% of participants were clinical staff and a majority had 0-5 years of experience (65%). Among all participants, there was a statistically significant improvement in confidence and comfort with the various aspects of agitation management across all 11 questions (p<0.001). A similar change was observed among the clinical staff (p<0.001), however, the degree of improvement observed among those with greater than 5 years of experience was less dramatic than among clinical staff with 0-5 years of experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interdisciplinary multi-modal training can improve confidence and comfort with verbal de-escalation and implicit bias checks in team-based agitation management. Additional research is needed to understand if such integrated training can also reduce physical restraint use, racial disparities in restraint use, and WPV events.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1355-1366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12012381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Feasibility and Effectiveness of an Interdisciplinary Verbal De-Escalation and Implicit Bias Check Training for Agitation Management in the Emergency Department.\",\"authors\":\"Jossie A Carreras Tartak, Giovanni Rodriguez, Madeline Schwid, Melissa A Meeker, Matthew D Thomas, Harold J Roy, Farah Z Dadabhoy, Melanie Molina, Anita Chary, Alice K Bukhman, Dana D Im, Elizabeth S Temin, Wendy L Macias-Konstantopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S513026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recent scholarship has revealed racial disparities in emergency department (ED) physical restraint use in agitation management. We implemented an interdisciplinary educational program that integrates discussions about the role of bias in physical restraint use with workplace violence (WPV) prevention strategies to increase awareness of implicit bias and comfort with verbal de-escalation among ED staff.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In partnership with hospital security at a large urban academic medical center, we developed a 1-hour online WPV prerequisite course followed by a 2-hour multi-modal, in-person training consisting of 40 minutes each of didactics, an interactive defensive skills workshop, and case-based simulations with structured debriefings. From September 2022 to June 2023, all patient-facing ED staff were invited to participate and received a $100 gift card for program completion. Participants rated their confidence and comfort in various aspects of agitation management on a 5-point Likert scale before and immediately after via pre- and post-training surveys. Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were employed for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 91 participants, 72 (79%) completed the pre- and post-training surveys. Representing a wide range of ED role groups, 74% of participants were clinical staff and a majority had 0-5 years of experience (65%). Among all participants, there was a statistically significant improvement in confidence and comfort with the various aspects of agitation management across all 11 questions (p<0.001). A similar change was observed among the clinical staff (p<0.001), however, the degree of improvement observed among those with greater than 5 years of experience was less dramatic than among clinical staff with 0-5 years of experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interdisciplinary multi-modal training can improve confidence and comfort with verbal de-escalation and implicit bias checks in team-based agitation management. Additional research is needed to understand if such integrated training can also reduce physical restraint use, racial disparities in restraint use, and WPV events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1355-1366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12012381/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S513026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S513026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近的学术研究揭示了急诊科(ED)在躁动管理中使用身体约束的种族差异。我们实施了一项跨学科的教育计划,该计划将关于身体约束使用中偏见的作用与工作场所暴力(WPV)预防策略相结合,以提高ED员工对隐性偏见的认识,并让他们感到舒适。患者和方法:我们与一家大型城市学术医疗中心的医院安全部门合作,开发了一个1小时的在线WPV先决课程,随后是一个2小时的多模式现场培训,包括每个教学40分钟,一个交互式防御技能研讨会,以及基于案例的结构化汇报模拟。从2022年9月到2023年6月,所有面对病人的ED工作人员都被邀请参加,并获得100美元的礼品卡作为项目完成的奖励。参与者通过培训前和培训后的调查,在5分李克特量表上评估了他们在躁动管理的各个方面的信心和舒适度。采用Wilcoxon配对检验进行分析。结果:在91名参与者中,72名(79%)完成了训练前和训练后的调查。代表了广泛的ED角色群体,74%的参与者是临床工作人员,大多数人有0-5年的经验(65%)。在所有参与者中,在所有11个问题中,对激越管理的各个方面的信心和舒适度都有统计学上显著的提高(p结论:跨学科多模式培训可以提高团队激越管理中言语降级和内隐偏见检查的信心和舒适度。需要进一步的研究来了解这种综合训练是否也可以减少身体约束的使用、约束使用中的种族差异和WPV事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Feasibility and Effectiveness of an Interdisciplinary Verbal De-Escalation and Implicit Bias Check Training for Agitation Management in the Emergency Department.

Purpose: Recent scholarship has revealed racial disparities in emergency department (ED) physical restraint use in agitation management. We implemented an interdisciplinary educational program that integrates discussions about the role of bias in physical restraint use with workplace violence (WPV) prevention strategies to increase awareness of implicit bias and comfort with verbal de-escalation among ED staff.

Patients and methods: In partnership with hospital security at a large urban academic medical center, we developed a 1-hour online WPV prerequisite course followed by a 2-hour multi-modal, in-person training consisting of 40 minutes each of didactics, an interactive defensive skills workshop, and case-based simulations with structured debriefings. From September 2022 to June 2023, all patient-facing ED staff were invited to participate and received a $100 gift card for program completion. Participants rated their confidence and comfort in various aspects of agitation management on a 5-point Likert scale before and immediately after via pre- and post-training surveys. Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were employed for analysis.

Results: Of 91 participants, 72 (79%) completed the pre- and post-training surveys. Representing a wide range of ED role groups, 74% of participants were clinical staff and a majority had 0-5 years of experience (65%). Among all participants, there was a statistically significant improvement in confidence and comfort with the various aspects of agitation management across all 11 questions (p<0.001). A similar change was observed among the clinical staff (p<0.001), however, the degree of improvement observed among those with greater than 5 years of experience was less dramatic than among clinical staff with 0-5 years of experience.

Conclusion: Interdisciplinary multi-modal training can improve confidence and comfort with verbal de-escalation and implicit bias checks in team-based agitation management. Additional research is needed to understand if such integrated training can also reduce physical restraint use, racial disparities in restraint use, and WPV events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信