Jossie A Carreras Tartak, Giovanni Rodriguez, Madeline Schwid, Melissa A Meeker, Matthew D Thomas, Harold J Roy, Farah Z Dadabhoy, Melanie Molina, Anita Chary, Alice K Bukhman, Dana D Im, Elizabeth S Temin, Wendy L Macias-Konstantopoulos
{"title":"评估跨学科言语降级与内隐偏见检查训练在急诊科躁动管理中的可行性与有效性。","authors":"Jossie A Carreras Tartak, Giovanni Rodriguez, Madeline Schwid, Melissa A Meeker, Matthew D Thomas, Harold J Roy, Farah Z Dadabhoy, Melanie Molina, Anita Chary, Alice K Bukhman, Dana D Im, Elizabeth S Temin, Wendy L Macias-Konstantopoulos","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S513026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recent scholarship has revealed racial disparities in emergency department (ED) physical restraint use in agitation management. We implemented an interdisciplinary educational program that integrates discussions about the role of bias in physical restraint use with workplace violence (WPV) prevention strategies to increase awareness of implicit bias and comfort with verbal de-escalation among ED staff.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In partnership with hospital security at a large urban academic medical center, we developed a 1-hour online WPV prerequisite course followed by a 2-hour multi-modal, in-person training consisting of 40 minutes each of didactics, an interactive defensive skills workshop, and case-based simulations with structured debriefings. From September 2022 to June 2023, all patient-facing ED staff were invited to participate and received a $100 gift card for program completion. Participants rated their confidence and comfort in various aspects of agitation management on a 5-point Likert scale before and immediately after via pre- and post-training surveys. Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were employed for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 91 participants, 72 (79%) completed the pre- and post-training surveys. Representing a wide range of ED role groups, 74% of participants were clinical staff and a majority had 0-5 years of experience (65%). Among all participants, there was a statistically significant improvement in confidence and comfort with the various aspects of agitation management across all 11 questions (p<0.001). A similar change was observed among the clinical staff (p<0.001), however, the degree of improvement observed among those with greater than 5 years of experience was less dramatic than among clinical staff with 0-5 years of experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interdisciplinary multi-modal training can improve confidence and comfort with verbal de-escalation and implicit bias checks in team-based agitation management. Additional research is needed to understand if such integrated training can also reduce physical restraint use, racial disparities in restraint use, and WPV events.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1355-1366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12012381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Feasibility and Effectiveness of an Interdisciplinary Verbal De-Escalation and Implicit Bias Check Training for Agitation Management in the Emergency Department.\",\"authors\":\"Jossie A Carreras Tartak, Giovanni Rodriguez, Madeline Schwid, Melissa A Meeker, Matthew D Thomas, Harold J Roy, Farah Z Dadabhoy, Melanie Molina, Anita Chary, Alice K Bukhman, Dana D Im, Elizabeth S Temin, Wendy L Macias-Konstantopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S513026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recent scholarship has revealed racial disparities in emergency department (ED) physical restraint use in agitation management. We implemented an interdisciplinary educational program that integrates discussions about the role of bias in physical restraint use with workplace violence (WPV) prevention strategies to increase awareness of implicit bias and comfort with verbal de-escalation among ED staff.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In partnership with hospital security at a large urban academic medical center, we developed a 1-hour online WPV prerequisite course followed by a 2-hour multi-modal, in-person training consisting of 40 minutes each of didactics, an interactive defensive skills workshop, and case-based simulations with structured debriefings. From September 2022 to June 2023, all patient-facing ED staff were invited to participate and received a $100 gift card for program completion. Participants rated their confidence and comfort in various aspects of agitation management on a 5-point Likert scale before and immediately after via pre- and post-training surveys. Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were employed for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 91 participants, 72 (79%) completed the pre- and post-training surveys. Representing a wide range of ED role groups, 74% of participants were clinical staff and a majority had 0-5 years of experience (65%). Among all participants, there was a statistically significant improvement in confidence and comfort with the various aspects of agitation management across all 11 questions (p<0.001). A similar change was observed among the clinical staff (p<0.001), however, the degree of improvement observed among those with greater than 5 years of experience was less dramatic than among clinical staff with 0-5 years of experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interdisciplinary multi-modal training can improve confidence and comfort with verbal de-escalation and implicit bias checks in team-based agitation management. Additional research is needed to understand if such integrated training can also reduce physical restraint use, racial disparities in restraint use, and WPV events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1355-1366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12012381/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S513026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S513026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the Feasibility and Effectiveness of an Interdisciplinary Verbal De-Escalation and Implicit Bias Check Training for Agitation Management in the Emergency Department.
Purpose: Recent scholarship has revealed racial disparities in emergency department (ED) physical restraint use in agitation management. We implemented an interdisciplinary educational program that integrates discussions about the role of bias in physical restraint use with workplace violence (WPV) prevention strategies to increase awareness of implicit bias and comfort with verbal de-escalation among ED staff.
Patients and methods: In partnership with hospital security at a large urban academic medical center, we developed a 1-hour online WPV prerequisite course followed by a 2-hour multi-modal, in-person training consisting of 40 minutes each of didactics, an interactive defensive skills workshop, and case-based simulations with structured debriefings. From September 2022 to June 2023, all patient-facing ED staff were invited to participate and received a $100 gift card for program completion. Participants rated their confidence and comfort in various aspects of agitation management on a 5-point Likert scale before and immediately after via pre- and post-training surveys. Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were employed for analysis.
Results: Of 91 participants, 72 (79%) completed the pre- and post-training surveys. Representing a wide range of ED role groups, 74% of participants were clinical staff and a majority had 0-5 years of experience (65%). Among all participants, there was a statistically significant improvement in confidence and comfort with the various aspects of agitation management across all 11 questions (p<0.001). A similar change was observed among the clinical staff (p<0.001), however, the degree of improvement observed among those with greater than 5 years of experience was less dramatic than among clinical staff with 0-5 years of experience.
Conclusion: Interdisciplinary multi-modal training can improve confidence and comfort with verbal de-escalation and implicit bias checks in team-based agitation management. Additional research is needed to understand if such integrated training can also reduce physical restraint use, racial disparities in restraint use, and WPV events.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.