疟疾患者血管性血友病因子水平的改变:疾病严重程度的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Suriyan Sukati, Rujikorn Rattanatham, Frederick Ramirez Masangkay, Ching-Ping Tseng, Manas Kotepui
{"title":"疟疾患者血管性血友病因子水平的改变:疾病严重程度的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Suriyan Sukati, Rujikorn Rattanatham, Frederick Ramirez Masangkay, Ching-Ping Tseng, Manas Kotepui","doi":"10.3390/medicina61040767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: Elevated von Willebrand factor (vWF) levels have been reported in malaria, but their relationship with disease severity remains unclear. This study aimed to compare vWF levels between <i>Plasmodium</i>-infected and uninfected individuals and assess changes in severe infections. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024558479). A comprehensive search across six databases identified studies reporting vWF levels in malaria. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, with standardized mean difference (SMD) as the effect measure due to varying measurement units. Heterogeneity was assessed using the <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistic. <i>Results</i>: Of 1647 identified records, 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed significantly higher vWF levels in <i>Plasmodium</i>-infected individuals compared to uninfected controls (<i>p</i> < 0.001, SMD: 2.689 [95% CI 1.362; 4.017], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 98.1%, 12 studies, 3109 participants). However, no significant difference was found between severe and less severe cases (<i>p</i> = 0.051, SMD: 3.551 [95% CI -0.007; 7.109], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 99.3%, 8 studies, 1453 participants). <i>Conclusions</i>: vWF levels are significantly elevated in individuals with <i>Plasmodium</i> infections, indicating a potential role in malaria pathophysiology. Although levels tend to be higher in severe cases, current evidence is insufficient to support vWF as a reliable marker for disease severity. Further prospective and well-controlled studies are needed to validate its diagnostic and prognostic value in malaria management.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"61 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12028635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alterations in von Willebrand Factor Levels in Patients with Malaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Disease Severity.\",\"authors\":\"Suriyan Sukati, Rujikorn Rattanatham, Frederick Ramirez Masangkay, Ching-Ping Tseng, Manas Kotepui\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medicina61040767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: Elevated von Willebrand factor (vWF) levels have been reported in malaria, but their relationship with disease severity remains unclear. This study aimed to compare vWF levels between <i>Plasmodium</i>-infected and uninfected individuals and assess changes in severe infections. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024558479). A comprehensive search across six databases identified studies reporting vWF levels in malaria. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, with standardized mean difference (SMD) as the effect measure due to varying measurement units. Heterogeneity was assessed using the <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistic. <i>Results</i>: Of 1647 identified records, 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed significantly higher vWF levels in <i>Plasmodium</i>-infected individuals compared to uninfected controls (<i>p</i> < 0.001, SMD: 2.689 [95% CI 1.362; 4.017], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 98.1%, 12 studies, 3109 participants). However, no significant difference was found between severe and less severe cases (<i>p</i> = 0.051, SMD: 3.551 [95% CI -0.007; 7.109], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 99.3%, 8 studies, 1453 participants). <i>Conclusions</i>: vWF levels are significantly elevated in individuals with <i>Plasmodium</i> infections, indicating a potential role in malaria pathophysiology. Although levels tend to be higher in severe cases, current evidence is insufficient to support vWF as a reliable marker for disease severity. Further prospective and well-controlled studies are needed to validate its diagnostic and prognostic value in malaria management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina-Lithuania\",\"volume\":\"61 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12028635/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina-Lithuania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61040767\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61040767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:据报道,在疟疾中血管性血友病因子(vWF)水平升高,但其与疾病严重程度的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较疟原虫感染者和未感染者之间的vWF水平,并评估严重感染的变化。材料和方法:系统评价在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024558479)。对6个数据库的全面搜索确定了报告疟疾中vWF水平的研究。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析,由于测量单位不同,以标准化平均差(SMD)作为效应度量。采用I2统计量评估异质性。结果:在1647份纳入的文献中,26项研究符合纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,与未感染的对照组相比,疟原虫感染者的vWF水平显著升高(p < 0.001, SMD: 2.689;[4.017],[2]: 98.1%, 12项研究,3109名受试者)。然而,重症和轻重症病例之间无显著差异(p = 0.051, SMD: 3.551) [95% CI -0.007;[7.109], I2: 99.3%, 8项研究,1453名受试者)。结论:vWF水平在疟原虫感染个体中显著升高,表明其可能在疟疾病理生理中发挥作用。虽然在严重病例中,vWF水平往往更高,但目前的证据不足以支持vWF作为疾病严重程度的可靠标志。需要进一步的前瞻性和良好对照研究来验证其在疟疾管理中的诊断和预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alterations in von Willebrand Factor Levels in Patients with Malaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Disease Severity.

Background and Objectives: Elevated von Willebrand factor (vWF) levels have been reported in malaria, but their relationship with disease severity remains unclear. This study aimed to compare vWF levels between Plasmodium-infected and uninfected individuals and assess changes in severe infections. Materials and Methods: The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024558479). A comprehensive search across six databases identified studies reporting vWF levels in malaria. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, with standardized mean difference (SMD) as the effect measure due to varying measurement units. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Results: Of 1647 identified records, 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed significantly higher vWF levels in Plasmodium-infected individuals compared to uninfected controls (p < 0.001, SMD: 2.689 [95% CI 1.362; 4.017], I2: 98.1%, 12 studies, 3109 participants). However, no significant difference was found between severe and less severe cases (p = 0.051, SMD: 3.551 [95% CI -0.007; 7.109], I2: 99.3%, 8 studies, 1453 participants). Conclusions: vWF levels are significantly elevated in individuals with Plasmodium infections, indicating a potential role in malaria pathophysiology. Although levels tend to be higher in severe cases, current evidence is insufficient to support vWF as a reliable marker for disease severity. Further prospective and well-controlled studies are needed to validate its diagnostic and prognostic value in malaria management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信