Gelofusine作为输注前清洗冷冻保存的造血干细胞产品的dextran40的替代品:验证和应用于临床实践

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-05-14 DOI:10.1111/trf.18272
Stefania Nappo, Mario Toriello, Giovanna Maisto, Peppino Mirabelli, Francesco Topo, Lucia Gallo, Giovanni Castellano, Martina Esposito, Laura Auriemma, Donato Madalese, Fabiana Cacace, Alessandra Picardi, Francesco Paolo Tambaro, Roberta Penta de Vera d'Aragona
{"title":"Gelofusine作为输注前清洗冷冻保存的造血干细胞产品的dextran40的替代品:验证和应用于临床实践","authors":"Stefania Nappo, Mario Toriello, Giovanna Maisto, Peppino Mirabelli, Francesco Topo, Lucia Gallo, Giovanni Castellano, Martina Esposito, Laura Auriemma, Donato Madalese, Fabiana Cacace, Alessandra Picardi, Francesco Paolo Tambaro, Roberta Penta de Vera d'Aragona","doi":"10.1111/trf.18272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cryopreservation is an essential step for autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation and umbilical cord blood units (CBUs), and for allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) or bone marrow (BM) when immediate infusion is not possible. However, the cryoprotectant dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) used for HSC cryopreservation can be toxic to cells post-thaw and to patients during infusion. The Rubinstein solution is validated to wash HSCs, but the unavailability of Dextran40 in Italy prompted a search for alternatives. This report discusses the use of Gelofusine, a 4% modified gelatin solution, as a substitute for Dextran40-based solutions in washing cryopreserved stem cell products.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>The study includes: (1) validation of Gelofusine in 10 CBUs unsuitable for transplantation; (2) outcomes of the first 93 transplanted units washed with Gelofusine; (3) comparisons of recovery and viability in five paired autologous PBSC products washed with Gelofusine and Rubinstein-solution; and (4) comparisons of engraftment times in patients receiving units washed with Gelofusine and Rubinstein-solution.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>For 10 CBUs washed with Gelofusine, CD34<sup>+</sup> and TNC viability and recovery were 96%, 87%, 71%, and 75% respectively, higher than our reference values. In transplanted products, CD34<sup>+</sup> and TNC viability and recovery were 96%, 89%, 82%, and 91% respectively. Comparisons with Rubinstein solution revealed similar TNC and CD34<sup>+</sup> recovery but significantly higher TNC (89% vs. 68%) and CD34<sup>+</sup> (97% vs. 89%) viability with Gelofusine. Engraftment times for both solutions were similar. These findings support Gelofusine as an effective and valid alternative to Rubinstein-solution for washing cryopreserved HSCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gelofusine as alternative to Dextran40-based solution for washing cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cell products prior to infusion: Validation and application to clinical practice.\",\"authors\":\"Stefania Nappo, Mario Toriello, Giovanna Maisto, Peppino Mirabelli, Francesco Topo, Lucia Gallo, Giovanni Castellano, Martina Esposito, Laura Auriemma, Donato Madalese, Fabiana Cacace, Alessandra Picardi, Francesco Paolo Tambaro, Roberta Penta de Vera d'Aragona\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/trf.18272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cryopreservation is an essential step for autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation and umbilical cord blood units (CBUs), and for allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) or bone marrow (BM) when immediate infusion is not possible. However, the cryoprotectant dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) used for HSC cryopreservation can be toxic to cells post-thaw and to patients during infusion. The Rubinstein solution is validated to wash HSCs, but the unavailability of Dextran40 in Italy prompted a search for alternatives. This report discusses the use of Gelofusine, a 4% modified gelatin solution, as a substitute for Dextran40-based solutions in washing cryopreserved stem cell products.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>The study includes: (1) validation of Gelofusine in 10 CBUs unsuitable for transplantation; (2) outcomes of the first 93 transplanted units washed with Gelofusine; (3) comparisons of recovery and viability in five paired autologous PBSC products washed with Gelofusine and Rubinstein-solution; and (4) comparisons of engraftment times in patients receiving units washed with Gelofusine and Rubinstein-solution.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>For 10 CBUs washed with Gelofusine, CD34<sup>+</sup> and TNC viability and recovery were 96%, 87%, 71%, and 75% respectively, higher than our reference values. In transplanted products, CD34<sup>+</sup> and TNC viability and recovery were 96%, 89%, 82%, and 91% respectively. Comparisons with Rubinstein solution revealed similar TNC and CD34<sup>+</sup> recovery but significantly higher TNC (89% vs. 68%) and CD34<sup>+</sup> (97% vs. 89%) viability with Gelofusine. Engraftment times for both solutions were similar. These findings support Gelofusine as an effective and valid alternative to Rubinstein-solution for washing cryopreserved HSCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18272\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18272","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冷冻保存是自体造血干细胞(HSC)移植和脐带血单位(CBUs)以及异体外周血干细胞(PBSCs)或骨髓(BM)在无法立即输注时的必要步骤。然而,用于HSC低温保存的冷冻保护剂二甲基亚砜(DMSO)可能在解冻后对细胞和输注期间对患者有毒性。Rubinstein溶液已被证实可以清洗造血干细胞,但在意大利Dextran40的缺位促使人们寻找替代品。本报告讨论了使用Gelofusine,一种4%的改性明胶溶液,作为dextran40基溶液的替代品,用于洗涤冷冻保存的干细胞产品。研究设计和方法:研究包括:(1)验证Gelofusine在10例不适合移植的CBUs中的应用;(2)用Gelofusine冲洗前93个移植单位的结果;(3)比较Gelofusine和Rubinstein-solution洗涤5对自体PBSC产品的回收率和活力;(4) Gelofusine和Rubinstein-solution洗涤单位患者种植时间的比较。结果与讨论:经Gelofusine洗涤10例CBUs, CD34+和TNC存活率和回收率分别为96%、87%、71%和75%,高于我们的参考值。移植产物中CD34+和TNC存活率和恢复率分别为96%、89%、82%和91%。与Rubinstein溶液的比较显示TNC和CD34+回收率相似,但Gelofusine的TNC(89%对68%)和CD34+活力(97%对89%)明显更高。两种溶液的植入时间相似。这些发现支持Gelofusine作为rubinstein溶液的有效替代品,用于清洗冷冻保存的造血干细胞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gelofusine as alternative to Dextran40-based solution for washing cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cell products prior to infusion: Validation and application to clinical practice.

Background: Cryopreservation is an essential step for autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation and umbilical cord blood units (CBUs), and for allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) or bone marrow (BM) when immediate infusion is not possible. However, the cryoprotectant dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) used for HSC cryopreservation can be toxic to cells post-thaw and to patients during infusion. The Rubinstein solution is validated to wash HSCs, but the unavailability of Dextran40 in Italy prompted a search for alternatives. This report discusses the use of Gelofusine, a 4% modified gelatin solution, as a substitute for Dextran40-based solutions in washing cryopreserved stem cell products.

Study design and methods: The study includes: (1) validation of Gelofusine in 10 CBUs unsuitable for transplantation; (2) outcomes of the first 93 transplanted units washed with Gelofusine; (3) comparisons of recovery and viability in five paired autologous PBSC products washed with Gelofusine and Rubinstein-solution; and (4) comparisons of engraftment times in patients receiving units washed with Gelofusine and Rubinstein-solution.

Results and discussion: For 10 CBUs washed with Gelofusine, CD34+ and TNC viability and recovery were 96%, 87%, 71%, and 75% respectively, higher than our reference values. In transplanted products, CD34+ and TNC viability and recovery were 96%, 89%, 82%, and 91% respectively. Comparisons with Rubinstein solution revealed similar TNC and CD34+ recovery but significantly higher TNC (89% vs. 68%) and CD34+ (97% vs. 89%) viability with Gelofusine. Engraftment times for both solutions were similar. These findings support Gelofusine as an effective and valid alternative to Rubinstein-solution for washing cryopreserved HSCs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信