室温硫化颌面硅树脂与高分子粘土粘结强度的体外研究。

IF 1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jayant N Palaskar, Amit Dhansukhlal Hindocha, Tejas V Nalawade, Shrishti R Khurana, Anupama Patankar, Naisargi Shah
{"title":"室温硫化颌面硅树脂与高分子粘土粘结强度的体外研究。","authors":"Jayant N Palaskar, Amit Dhansukhlal Hindocha, Tejas V Nalawade, Shrishti R Khurana, Anupama Patankar, Naisargi Shah","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_543_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess and analyze the bond strength of polymeric organic clay and heat polymerized PMMA with RTV maxillofacial silicone with and without an adhesive primer.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>The use of polymeric clay as a substructure for implant retained maxillofacial silicone prosthesis is suggested. However, the bond strength of polymeric clay with room temperature vulcanizing (RTV) maxillofacial silicone and heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate(PMMA) with RTV maxillofacial silicone has yet to be studied.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty two samples were prepared in total. Group 1 (n = 13) silicone and PMMA without primer. Group 2 (n = 13) silicone and PMMA with primer. Group 3 (n = 13) silicone and polymer clay without primer. Group 4 (n = 13) silicone and polymer clay with primer. The samples were of dimensions of 75 mm × 10 mm × 3 mm. For groups 1 and 2, samples were fabricated with PMMA over which RTV silicone was manipulated, packed and vulcanized for 24 h. For Groups 3 and 4, polymer clay was molded to the required dimensions and hardened. RTV maxillofacial silicone was manipulated and packed over it and vulcanized. For Group 2 and 4 samples, primer was applied to the uncovered part of PMMA and polymeric clay respectively. The samples were subjected to a 180° and 90° (t peel test) peel strength test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>One way analysis of variance was used to analyze bond strength, which was then followed by a post hoc Tukey's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean bond strength of silicone and PMMA without primer was 0.35 ± 0.07 mN/m, while silicone and PMMA with primer had a mean bond strength of 0.41 ± 0.04 mN/m. The mean bond strength of silicone and polymer clay without primer and silicone and polymer clay with primer was found to be 0.45 ± 0.13 mN/m and 0.30 ± 0.05 mN/m, respectively. An 80% research power and a 95% confidence interval were used in the statistical analysis. A significance threshold of P < 0.05 was applied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The silicone to heat polymerized PMMA primer bond strength is the same as the silicone to polymer clay primer bond strength. Bond strength of polymer clay and maxillofacial silicone without primer is better than with primer. Therefore, without primer application, polymer clay substitutes PMMA as an interface between maxillofacial silicone material and attachments/keepers.</p>","PeriodicalId":22669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":"24 4","pages":"397-403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11614130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bond strength of polymer clay with room temperature vulcanizing maxillofacial silicone - An in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Jayant N Palaskar, Amit Dhansukhlal Hindocha, Tejas V Nalawade, Shrishti R Khurana, Anupama Patankar, Naisargi Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jips.jips_543_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess and analyze the bond strength of polymeric organic clay and heat polymerized PMMA with RTV maxillofacial silicone with and without an adhesive primer.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>The use of polymeric clay as a substructure for implant retained maxillofacial silicone prosthesis is suggested. However, the bond strength of polymeric clay with room temperature vulcanizing (RTV) maxillofacial silicone and heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate(PMMA) with RTV maxillofacial silicone has yet to be studied.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty two samples were prepared in total. Group 1 (n = 13) silicone and PMMA without primer. Group 2 (n = 13) silicone and PMMA with primer. Group 3 (n = 13) silicone and polymer clay without primer. Group 4 (n = 13) silicone and polymer clay with primer. The samples were of dimensions of 75 mm × 10 mm × 3 mm. For groups 1 and 2, samples were fabricated with PMMA over which RTV silicone was manipulated, packed and vulcanized for 24 h. For Groups 3 and 4, polymer clay was molded to the required dimensions and hardened. RTV maxillofacial silicone was manipulated and packed over it and vulcanized. For Group 2 and 4 samples, primer was applied to the uncovered part of PMMA and polymeric clay respectively. The samples were subjected to a 180° and 90° (t peel test) peel strength test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>One way analysis of variance was used to analyze bond strength, which was then followed by a post hoc Tukey's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean bond strength of silicone and PMMA without primer was 0.35 ± 0.07 mN/m, while silicone and PMMA with primer had a mean bond strength of 0.41 ± 0.04 mN/m. The mean bond strength of silicone and polymer clay without primer and silicone and polymer clay with primer was found to be 0.45 ± 0.13 mN/m and 0.30 ± 0.05 mN/m, respectively. An 80% research power and a 95% confidence interval were used in the statistical analysis. A significance threshold of P < 0.05 was applied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The silicone to heat polymerized PMMA primer bond strength is the same as the silicone to polymer clay primer bond strength. Bond strength of polymer clay and maxillofacial silicone without primer is better than with primer. Therefore, without primer application, polymer clay substitutes PMMA as an interface between maxillofacial silicone material and attachments/keepers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"397-403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11614130/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_543_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_543_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价和分析RTV颌面硅胶与热聚合PMMA在有底胶和无底胶情况下的结合强度。设置和设计:建议使用聚合粘土作为种植体保留的颌面硅胶假体的亚结构。然而,聚合物粘土与室温硫化(RTV)颌面硅树脂的结合强度以及热聚合聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)与室温硫化(RTV)颌面硅树脂的结合强度还有待研究。材料与方法:共制备52份样品。第一组(n = 13)无底漆的有机硅和PMMA。第二组(n = 13)有机硅和PMMA带底漆。第3组(n = 13)无底漆的有机硅和聚合物粘土。第4组(n = 13)有机硅和聚合物粘土带底漆。样品尺寸为75 mm × 10 mm × 3 mm。对于第1组和第2组,样品用PMMA制作,RTV硅胶在其上进行处理,包装和硫化24小时。对于第3组和第4组,聚合物粘土被模塑到所需的尺寸并硬化。RTV颌面硅胶被处理和包装在它和硫化。对于第2组和第4组样品,分别在PMMA和聚合物粘土的未覆盖部分涂上引物。试样分别进行了180°和90°(t)剥离强度试验。采用统计分析:采用单向方差分析分析粘结强度,然后进行事后Tukey检验。结果:无处理剂的有机硅与PMMA的平均结合强度为0.35±0.07 mN/m,有处理剂的有机硅与PMMA的平均结合强度为0.41±0.04 mN/m。无底漆和有底漆的有机硅与聚合物粘土的平均结合强度分别为0.45±0.13 mN/m和0.30±0.05 mN/m。统计分析采用80%的研究力和95%的置信区间。采用P < 0.05的显著性阈值。结论:有机硅与热聚合PMMA底漆的结合强度与有机硅与聚合物粘土底漆的结合强度相同。不加底漆的聚合物粘土与颌面部硅胶的结合强度比加底漆的好。因此,在没有底漆的情况下,聚合物粘土代替PMMA作为颌面硅胶材料和附件/保持器之间的界面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bond strength of polymer clay with room temperature vulcanizing maxillofacial silicone - An in vitro study.

Aim: To assess and analyze the bond strength of polymeric organic clay and heat polymerized PMMA with RTV maxillofacial silicone with and without an adhesive primer.

Settings and design: The use of polymeric clay as a substructure for implant retained maxillofacial silicone prosthesis is suggested. However, the bond strength of polymeric clay with room temperature vulcanizing (RTV) maxillofacial silicone and heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate(PMMA) with RTV maxillofacial silicone has yet to be studied.

Materials and methods: Fifty two samples were prepared in total. Group 1 (n = 13) silicone and PMMA without primer. Group 2 (n = 13) silicone and PMMA with primer. Group 3 (n = 13) silicone and polymer clay without primer. Group 4 (n = 13) silicone and polymer clay with primer. The samples were of dimensions of 75 mm × 10 mm × 3 mm. For groups 1 and 2, samples were fabricated with PMMA over which RTV silicone was manipulated, packed and vulcanized for 24 h. For Groups 3 and 4, polymer clay was molded to the required dimensions and hardened. RTV maxillofacial silicone was manipulated and packed over it and vulcanized. For Group 2 and 4 samples, primer was applied to the uncovered part of PMMA and polymeric clay respectively. The samples were subjected to a 180° and 90° (t peel test) peel strength test, respectively.

Statistical analysis used: One way analysis of variance was used to analyze bond strength, which was then followed by a post hoc Tukey's test.

Results: The mean bond strength of silicone and PMMA without primer was 0.35 ± 0.07 mN/m, while silicone and PMMA with primer had a mean bond strength of 0.41 ± 0.04 mN/m. The mean bond strength of silicone and polymer clay without primer and silicone and polymer clay with primer was found to be 0.45 ± 0.13 mN/m and 0.30 ± 0.05 mN/m, respectively. An 80% research power and a 95% confidence interval were used in the statistical analysis. A significance threshold of P < 0.05 was applied.

Conclusion: The silicone to heat polymerized PMMA primer bond strength is the same as the silicone to polymer clay primer bond strength. Bond strength of polymer clay and maxillofacial silicone without primer is better than with primer. Therefore, without primer application, polymer clay substitutes PMMA as an interface between maxillofacial silicone material and attachments/keepers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信