Ujjwal Das, Rajesh Kumar Das, Kallol Kumar Saha, Lugu Buru Murmu, Srimanta Banerjee, Rishila Nag
{"title":"各种寻径根管器械抗屈曲性能的体外研究。","authors":"Ujjwal Das, Rajesh Kumar Das, Kallol Kumar Saha, Lugu Buru Murmu, Srimanta Banerjee, Rishila Nag","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_54_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lateral bending of an endodontic instrument under axial load is referred to as buckling, an essential property to resist elastic or plastic deformation during canal scouting. Pathfinding file systems with sufficient buckling resistance can assist in locating the orifice of a canal and gaining entrance to the apical one-third of the root canal.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of the present study is to assess and compare the buckling resistance of various pathfinding file systems.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This research analyzed the buckling resistance of C+ File, C-Pilot File, K-File, ProGlider, TruNatomy glider, and PathFile. A gradually increasing axial load was applied to the instruments with the help of a universal testing machine, and for each instrument, the maximum load necessary to achieve a lateral elastic displacement of 1 mm was documented.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>After the collection of data, one-way analysis of variance, followed by a Tukey's post hoc test, was utilized for comparisons between groups. <i>P</i> ≤0.05 indicated statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed that the C+ File had the highest mean buckling resistance, while the PathFile exhibited the lowest value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Buckling resistance is influenced by the materials, manufacturing processes, and design of pathfinding instruments. Stainless steel instruments exhibit greater resistance to buckling than nickel-titanium instruments.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 4","pages":"384-388"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Buckling resistance of various pathfinding endodontic instruments: An <i>in vitro</i> study.\",\"authors\":\"Ujjwal Das, Rajesh Kumar Das, Kallol Kumar Saha, Lugu Buru Murmu, Srimanta Banerjee, Rishila Nag\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_54_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lateral bending of an endodontic instrument under axial load is referred to as buckling, an essential property to resist elastic or plastic deformation during canal scouting. Pathfinding file systems with sufficient buckling resistance can assist in locating the orifice of a canal and gaining entrance to the apical one-third of the root canal.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of the present study is to assess and compare the buckling resistance of various pathfinding file systems.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This research analyzed the buckling resistance of C+ File, C-Pilot File, K-File, ProGlider, TruNatomy glider, and PathFile. A gradually increasing axial load was applied to the instruments with the help of a universal testing machine, and for each instrument, the maximum load necessary to achieve a lateral elastic displacement of 1 mm was documented.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>After the collection of data, one-way analysis of variance, followed by a Tukey's post hoc test, was utilized for comparisons between groups. <i>P</i> ≤0.05 indicated statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed that the C+ File had the highest mean buckling resistance, while the PathFile exhibited the lowest value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Buckling resistance is influenced by the materials, manufacturing processes, and design of pathfinding instruments. Stainless steel instruments exhibit greater resistance to buckling than nickel-titanium instruments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"384-388\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037123/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_54_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_54_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:根管器械在轴向载荷下的侧向弯曲被称为屈曲,这是根管探测过程中抵抗弹性或塑性变形的基本特性。具有足够抗屈曲性的寻路文件系统可以帮助定位根管口并获得根管根尖三分之一的入口。目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较各种寻径文件系统的抗屈曲性。材料与方法:本研究分析了C+ File、C- pilot File、K-File、ProGlider、TruNatomy glider和PathFile的抗屈曲性能。在万能试验机的帮助下,向仪器施加逐渐增加的轴向载荷,并记录每个仪器实现1毫米横向弹性位移所需的最大载荷。统计分析:收集资料后,采用单因素方差分析和Tukey’s事后检验进行组间比较。P≤0.05为有统计学意义。结果:C+ File的平均屈曲抗力最高,PathFile的平均屈曲抗力最低。结论:寻径仪的材料、制造工艺和设计对抗屈曲性能有影响。不锈钢仪器比镍钛仪器具有更强的抗屈曲能力。
Buckling resistance of various pathfinding endodontic instruments: An in vitro study.
Introduction: Lateral bending of an endodontic instrument under axial load is referred to as buckling, an essential property to resist elastic or plastic deformation during canal scouting. Pathfinding file systems with sufficient buckling resistance can assist in locating the orifice of a canal and gaining entrance to the apical one-third of the root canal.
Aim: The purpose of the present study is to assess and compare the buckling resistance of various pathfinding file systems.
Materials and methods: This research analyzed the buckling resistance of C+ File, C-Pilot File, K-File, ProGlider, TruNatomy glider, and PathFile. A gradually increasing axial load was applied to the instruments with the help of a universal testing machine, and for each instrument, the maximum load necessary to achieve a lateral elastic displacement of 1 mm was documented.
Statistical analysis: After the collection of data, one-way analysis of variance, followed by a Tukey's post hoc test, was utilized for comparisons between groups. P ≤0.05 indicated statistical significance.
Results: The study revealed that the C+ File had the highest mean buckling resistance, while the PathFile exhibited the lowest value.
Conclusion: Buckling resistance is influenced by the materials, manufacturing processes, and design of pathfinding instruments. Stainless steel instruments exhibit greater resistance to buckling than nickel-titanium instruments.