当前的法律工具能否充分应对医疗领域私募股权投资的风险?

Q2 Social Sciences
Robert I Field
{"title":"当前的法律工具能否充分应对医疗领域私募股权投资的风险?","authors":"Robert I Field","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2025.333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As private equity (PE) funds acquire a growing share of America's health care system, their focus has expanded to include not only hospitals and nursing homes but also physician practices. Some PE acquisitions have infused much-needed capital into resource-starved entities, but others have led to higher prices, diminished quality of services, and billing fraud. Some PE acquisitions have also forced viable entities into bankruptcy by stripping their real estate and other assets. This article explains how legal and regulatory responses to these outcomes can be impeded by corporate structures that PE funds commonly use to obscure responsibility. It also suggests reforms that could strengthen enforcement capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":38034,"journal":{"name":"AMA journal of ethics","volume":"27 5","pages":"E333-340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Current Legal Tools Respond Adequately to Risks of Private Equity Investment in Health Care?\",\"authors\":\"Robert I Field\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/amajethics.2025.333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As private equity (PE) funds acquire a growing share of America's health care system, their focus has expanded to include not only hospitals and nursing homes but also physician practices. Some PE acquisitions have infused much-needed capital into resource-starved entities, but others have led to higher prices, diminished quality of services, and billing fraud. Some PE acquisitions have also forced viable entities into bankruptcy by stripping their real estate and other assets. This article explains how legal and regulatory responses to these outcomes can be impeded by corporate structures that PE funds commonly use to obscure responsibility. It also suggests reforms that could strengthen enforcement capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"E333-340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMA journal of ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMA journal of ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着私募股权(PE)基金在美国医疗保健体系中所占的份额越来越大,它们的关注点已经扩大到不仅包括医院和养老院,还包括医生诊所。一些私募股权收购为资源匮乏的实体注入了急需的资金,但也有一些收购导致了价格上涨、服务质量下降和账单欺诈。一些私募股权公司的收购还通过剥离其房地产和其他资产,迫使有生存能力的实体破产。本文解释了私募股权基金通常用来模糊责任的公司结构如何阻碍了法律和监管部门对这些结果的反应。报告还建议进行改革,以加强执法能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Current Legal Tools Respond Adequately to Risks of Private Equity Investment in Health Care?

As private equity (PE) funds acquire a growing share of America's health care system, their focus has expanded to include not only hospitals and nursing homes but also physician practices. Some PE acquisitions have infused much-needed capital into resource-starved entities, but others have led to higher prices, diminished quality of services, and billing fraud. Some PE acquisitions have also forced viable entities into bankruptcy by stripping their real estate and other assets. This article explains how legal and regulatory responses to these outcomes can be impeded by corporate structures that PE funds commonly use to obscure responsibility. It also suggests reforms that could strengthen enforcement capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AMA journal of ethics
AMA journal of ethics Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The AMA Journal of Ethics exists to help medical students, physicians and all health care professionals navigate ethical decisions in service to patients and society. The journal publishes cases and expert commentary, medical education articles, policy discussions, peer-reviewed articles for journal-based and audio CME, visuals, and more. Since its inception as an editorially-independent journal, we promote ethics inquiry as a public good.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信