腰椎微椎间盘切除术后2年内与翻修微椎间盘切除术或后续脊柱融合相关的危险因素。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-10-15 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005302
Dallas E Kramer, Tyson S Barrett, Charlotte Drury-Gworek, Keith LeJeune, Boyle C Cheng, Praveer Vyas, Kevin Walsh, Edward Richard Prostko, Daniel T Altman, Lara Massie
{"title":"腰椎微椎间盘切除术后2年内与翻修微椎间盘切除术或后续脊柱融合相关的危险因素。","authors":"Dallas E Kramer, Tyson S Barrett, Charlotte Drury-Gworek, Keith LeJeune, Boyle C Cheng, Praveer Vyas, Kevin Walsh, Edward Richard Prostko, Daniel T Altman, Lara Massie","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of insurance claims and electronic medical records of a major blended health organization in the eastern United States.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Primary objective was to report rates of revision microdiscectomy and fusion within two years of index lumbar microdiscectomy. Secondary objectives were to identify patient characteristics and comorbidities predictive for revision surgeries.</p><p><strong>Summary of background information: </strong>Incidence of disc reherniation after lumbar microdiscectomy ranges from 3% to 18%. Although rates of revision microdiscectomy are well reported, rates of fusion after index microdiscectomy and risk factors for subsequent fusion beyond history of prior discectomy warrants further investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of health insurance claims data for index lumbar microdiscectomy between January 2016, and December 2019. Rates of revision microdiscectomy and fusion within two years were reported, and cohort demographics and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) comorbidities were analyzed using Pearson χ 2 analyses and Fisher exact tests. Time-to-event modeling and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression assessed for predictors of revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The full sample consisted of 8158 members. The rate of revision microdiscectomy was 3.5% within one year and 5.5% within two years of index surgery. The rate of fusion was 2.9% within one year and 6.6% within two years of index surgery. Age 40 to 59 ( P <0.001), female sex ( P =0.024), and presence of ≥1 CCI comorbidities ( P <0.001) were significantly associated with time-to-fusion but not revision microdiscectomy. Increasing CCI score was associated with a significantly greater likelihood of need for fusion (CCI=1, HR 1.35, P =0.045; CCI=2, HR 1.85, P <0.001; CCI ≥ 3, HR 2.47, P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rates of revision microdiscectomy and fusion within two years of index lumbar microdiscectomy were 5.5% and 6.6%, respectively. Age 40 to 59 years, female sex, and having ≥1 CCI comorbidity, were significantly predictive of time-to-fusion but not revision microdiscectomy. Having at least one comorbidity increased the likelihood of fusion by 80%.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1392-1399"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors Associated With Revision Microdiscectomy or Subsequent Spinal Fusion Within Two Years of Index Lumbar Microdiscectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Dallas E Kramer, Tyson S Barrett, Charlotte Drury-Gworek, Keith LeJeune, Boyle C Cheng, Praveer Vyas, Kevin Walsh, Edward Richard Prostko, Daniel T Altman, Lara Massie\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of insurance claims and electronic medical records of a major blended health organization in the eastern United States.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Primary objective was to report rates of revision microdiscectomy and fusion within two years of index lumbar microdiscectomy. Secondary objectives were to identify patient characteristics and comorbidities predictive for revision surgeries.</p><p><strong>Summary of background information: </strong>Incidence of disc reherniation after lumbar microdiscectomy ranges from 3% to 18%. Although rates of revision microdiscectomy are well reported, rates of fusion after index microdiscectomy and risk factors for subsequent fusion beyond history of prior discectomy warrants further investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of health insurance claims data for index lumbar microdiscectomy between January 2016, and December 2019. Rates of revision microdiscectomy and fusion within two years were reported, and cohort demographics and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) comorbidities were analyzed using Pearson χ 2 analyses and Fisher exact tests. Time-to-event modeling and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression assessed for predictors of revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The full sample consisted of 8158 members. The rate of revision microdiscectomy was 3.5% within one year and 5.5% within two years of index surgery. The rate of fusion was 2.9% within one year and 6.6% within two years of index surgery. Age 40 to 59 ( P <0.001), female sex ( P =0.024), and presence of ≥1 CCI comorbidities ( P <0.001) were significantly associated with time-to-fusion but not revision microdiscectomy. Increasing CCI score was associated with a significantly greater likelihood of need for fusion (CCI=1, HR 1.35, P =0.045; CCI=2, HR 1.85, P <0.001; CCI ≥ 3, HR 2.47, P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rates of revision microdiscectomy and fusion within two years of index lumbar microdiscectomy were 5.5% and 6.6%, respectively. Age 40 to 59 years, female sex, and having ≥1 CCI comorbidity, were significantly predictive of time-to-fusion but not revision microdiscectomy. Having at least one comorbidity increased the likelihood of fusion by 80%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1392-1399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005302\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005302","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:对美国东部一家大型混合医疗机构的保险索赔和电子医疗记录进行回顾性分析。目的:主要目的是报道腰椎微椎间盘切除术后2年内翻修和融合的发生率。次要目的是确定患者特征和预测翻修手术的合并症。背景资料概述:腰椎微椎间盘切除术后椎间盘再突出的发生率为3%至18%。虽然翻修型微椎间盘切除术的发生率有很好的报道,但指数型微椎间盘切除术后的融合率和既往椎间盘切除术以外的后续融合的危险因素值得进一步调查。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年12月腰椎微椎间盘切除术的医疗保险索赔数据。报告了2年内微创椎间盘切除术和融合的发生率,并使用Pearson卡方分析和Fisher精确检验分析了队列人口统计学和Charlson合并症指数(CCI)合并症。时间-事件模型和多变量Cox比例风险回归评估翻修手术的预测因素。结果:完整样本包括8158名成员。显微椎间盘切除术翻修率在指数手术后1年内为3.5%,2年内为5.5%。术后1年内融合率为2.9%,2年内融合率为6.6%。结论:腰椎微椎间盘切除术后2年内翻修和融合率分别为5.5%和6.6%。年龄40-59岁,女性,且CCI合并症≥1,可显著预测融合时间,但不能预测微创椎间盘切除术翻修。至少有一种合并症使融合的可能性增加80%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Factors Associated With Revision Microdiscectomy or Subsequent Spinal Fusion Within Two Years of Index Lumbar Microdiscectomy.

Study design: Retrospective review of insurance claims and electronic medical records of a major blended health organization in the eastern United States.

Objective: Primary objective was to report rates of revision microdiscectomy and fusion within two years of index lumbar microdiscectomy. Secondary objectives were to identify patient characteristics and comorbidities predictive for revision surgeries.

Summary of background information: Incidence of disc reherniation after lumbar microdiscectomy ranges from 3% to 18%. Although rates of revision microdiscectomy are well reported, rates of fusion after index microdiscectomy and risk factors for subsequent fusion beyond history of prior discectomy warrants further investigation.

Methods: Retrospective review of health insurance claims data for index lumbar microdiscectomy between January 2016, and December 2019. Rates of revision microdiscectomy and fusion within two years were reported, and cohort demographics and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) comorbidities were analyzed using Pearson χ 2 analyses and Fisher exact tests. Time-to-event modeling and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression assessed for predictors of revision surgery.

Results: The full sample consisted of 8158 members. The rate of revision microdiscectomy was 3.5% within one year and 5.5% within two years of index surgery. The rate of fusion was 2.9% within one year and 6.6% within two years of index surgery. Age 40 to 59 ( P <0.001), female sex ( P =0.024), and presence of ≥1 CCI comorbidities ( P <0.001) were significantly associated with time-to-fusion but not revision microdiscectomy. Increasing CCI score was associated with a significantly greater likelihood of need for fusion (CCI=1, HR 1.35, P =0.045; CCI=2, HR 1.85, P <0.001; CCI ≥ 3, HR 2.47, P <0.001).

Conclusion: Rates of revision microdiscectomy and fusion within two years of index lumbar microdiscectomy were 5.5% and 6.6%, respectively. Age 40 to 59 years, female sex, and having ≥1 CCI comorbidity, were significantly predictive of time-to-fusion but not revision microdiscectomy. Having at least one comorbidity increased the likelihood of fusion by 80%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信