Thomas French, Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh, Vincenzo Giordano, Charilaos-Panagiotis Koutsogiannidis, Kelvin Hao Han Lim, Renzo Pessotto, Vipin Zamvar
{"title":"无缝合主动脉瓣和术后房颤:来自倾向匹配队列研究的5年结果。","authors":"Thomas French, Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh, Vincenzo Giordano, Charilaos-Panagiotis Koutsogiannidis, Kelvin Hao Han Lim, Renzo Pessotto, Vipin Zamvar","doi":"10.4330/wjc.v17.i4.102669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Perceval Sorin S (perceval valve) is a sutureless bioprosthetic designed for use in a high-risk cohort who may not be suitable for transcatheter aortic valve implantation or a conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare five-year post-operative outcomes in a cohort undergoing isolated AVR with the perceval valve to a contemporary cohort undergoing surgical AVR with a sutured bioprosthesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective, cohort study at a single tertiary unit. Between 2017 and 2023, 982 suitable patients were identified. 174 Perceval valve replacements were matched to 174 sutured valve replacements. Cohort characteristics, intra-operative details, and post-operative outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Time under the aortic cross-clamp (<i>P</i> < 0.001), time on the cardiopulmonary bypass (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and total operative time (<i>P</i> < 0.001) were significantly reduced in the Perceval group. Patients in the Perceval valve group were at a lower risk of postoperative pneumonia [odds ratio (OR) = 0.53 (0.29-0.94)] and atrial fibrillation [OR = 0.58 (0.36-0.93)]. After propensity-matching, all-cause mortality did not significantly differ between the two groups in the five-year follow-up period. Larger valve sizes conferred an increased risk of mortality (<i>P</i> = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sutureless surgical AVR (SAVR) is a safe and efficient alternative to SAVR with a sutured bioprosthesis, and may confer a reduced risk of post-operative atrial fibrillation. Clinician tendency towards 'oversizing' sutureless aortic valves translates into adverse clinical outcomes. Less time on the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit allows for the treatment of otherwise high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23800,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiology","volume":"17 4","pages":"102669"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12038705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sutureless aortic valve and post-operative atrial fibrillation: Five-year outcomes from a propensity matched cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas French, Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh, Vincenzo Giordano, Charilaos-Panagiotis Koutsogiannidis, Kelvin Hao Han Lim, Renzo Pessotto, Vipin Zamvar\",\"doi\":\"10.4330/wjc.v17.i4.102669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Perceval Sorin S (perceval valve) is a sutureless bioprosthetic designed for use in a high-risk cohort who may not be suitable for transcatheter aortic valve implantation or a conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare five-year post-operative outcomes in a cohort undergoing isolated AVR with the perceval valve to a contemporary cohort undergoing surgical AVR with a sutured bioprosthesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective, cohort study at a single tertiary unit. Between 2017 and 2023, 982 suitable patients were identified. 174 Perceval valve replacements were matched to 174 sutured valve replacements. Cohort characteristics, intra-operative details, and post-operative outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Time under the aortic cross-clamp (<i>P</i> < 0.001), time on the cardiopulmonary bypass (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and total operative time (<i>P</i> < 0.001) were significantly reduced in the Perceval group. Patients in the Perceval valve group were at a lower risk of postoperative pneumonia [odds ratio (OR) = 0.53 (0.29-0.94)] and atrial fibrillation [OR = 0.58 (0.36-0.93)]. After propensity-matching, all-cause mortality did not significantly differ between the two groups in the five-year follow-up period. Larger valve sizes conferred an increased risk of mortality (<i>P</i> = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sutureless surgical AVR (SAVR) is a safe and efficient alternative to SAVR with a sutured bioprosthesis, and may confer a reduced risk of post-operative atrial fibrillation. Clinician tendency towards 'oversizing' sutureless aortic valves translates into adverse clinical outcomes. Less time on the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit allows for the treatment of otherwise high-risk patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"102669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12038705/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i4.102669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i4.102669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sutureless aortic valve and post-operative atrial fibrillation: Five-year outcomes from a propensity matched cohort study.
Background: The Perceval Sorin S (perceval valve) is a sutureless bioprosthetic designed for use in a high-risk cohort who may not be suitable for transcatheter aortic valve implantation or a conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR).
Aim: To compare five-year post-operative outcomes in a cohort undergoing isolated AVR with the perceval valve to a contemporary cohort undergoing surgical AVR with a sutured bioprosthesis.
Methods: This study was a retrospective, cohort study at a single tertiary unit. Between 2017 and 2023, 982 suitable patients were identified. 174 Perceval valve replacements were matched to 174 sutured valve replacements. Cohort characteristics, intra-operative details, and post-operative outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results: Time under the aortic cross-clamp (P < 0.001), time on the cardiopulmonary bypass (P < 0.001) and total operative time (P < 0.001) were significantly reduced in the Perceval group. Patients in the Perceval valve group were at a lower risk of postoperative pneumonia [odds ratio (OR) = 0.53 (0.29-0.94)] and atrial fibrillation [OR = 0.58 (0.36-0.93)]. After propensity-matching, all-cause mortality did not significantly differ between the two groups in the five-year follow-up period. Larger valve sizes conferred an increased risk of mortality (P = 0.020).
Conclusion: Sutureless surgical AVR (SAVR) is a safe and efficient alternative to SAVR with a sutured bioprosthesis, and may confer a reduced risk of post-operative atrial fibrillation. Clinician tendency towards 'oversizing' sutureless aortic valves translates into adverse clinical outcomes. Less time on the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit allows for the treatment of otherwise high-risk patients.