腹膜透析训练和干预:叙述性回顾。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Helen Hurst, Ana Elizabeth Figueiredo, Diana Perez Moran, Gillian Brunier, Joanna Lee Neumann, Miguel Angel Trejo-Villeda, Jsf Chow
{"title":"腹膜透析训练和干预:叙述性回顾。","authors":"Helen Hurst, Ana Elizabeth Figueiredo, Diana Perez Moran, Gillian Brunier, Joanna Lee Neumann, Miguel Angel Trejo-Villeda, Jsf Chow","doi":"10.1177/08968608251328517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPeritoneal dialysis (PD) training and education for patients and their caregivers, provided by PD nurses, are crucial for effective PD programs. The goal is to impart sufficient knowledge, skills, training, and support to minimize complications. However, the evidence regarding effective educational interventions during training has been unclear and inconsistent. The review question was: How do PD training methods and educational interventions impact on PD outcomes in adult patients?MethodsA narrative review was undertaken with defined inclusion and exclusion criteria of articles published in the last 10 years. Databases were searched, followed by a selection process conducted with the project team. Quality appraisal and a final selection were uploaded to Excel, and data was extracted. A narrative description of the results was then completed.ResultsA total of 982 articles followed the selection process of these 21 studies, including mixed methods research design, but all met the inclusion criteria. The results were described under headings of training methods, educational interventions, patient characteristics, retraining, and outcomes reported.ConclusionsThe narrative review highlights gaps in robust evidence for educational interventions during training. However, some evidence supports adapting PD training methods to incorporate more individualized approaches, appropriate pre-training assessments, and consistent outcome measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19969,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","volume":" ","pages":"8968608251328517"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peritoneal dialysis training and interventions: A narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Helen Hurst, Ana Elizabeth Figueiredo, Diana Perez Moran, Gillian Brunier, Joanna Lee Neumann, Miguel Angel Trejo-Villeda, Jsf Chow\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08968608251328517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundPeritoneal dialysis (PD) training and education for patients and their caregivers, provided by PD nurses, are crucial for effective PD programs. The goal is to impart sufficient knowledge, skills, training, and support to minimize complications. However, the evidence regarding effective educational interventions during training has been unclear and inconsistent. The review question was: How do PD training methods and educational interventions impact on PD outcomes in adult patients?MethodsA narrative review was undertaken with defined inclusion and exclusion criteria of articles published in the last 10 years. Databases were searched, followed by a selection process conducted with the project team. Quality appraisal and a final selection were uploaded to Excel, and data was extracted. A narrative description of the results was then completed.ResultsA total of 982 articles followed the selection process of these 21 studies, including mixed methods research design, but all met the inclusion criteria. The results were described under headings of training methods, educational interventions, patient characteristics, retraining, and outcomes reported.ConclusionsThe narrative review highlights gaps in robust evidence for educational interventions during training. However, some evidence supports adapting PD training methods to incorporate more individualized approaches, appropriate pre-training assessments, and consistent outcome measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peritoneal Dialysis International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8968608251328517\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peritoneal Dialysis International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608251328517\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608251328517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腹膜透析(PD)培训和教育是腹膜透析项目有效实施的关键。目标是传授足够的知识、技能、培训和支持,以尽量减少并发症。然而,关于培训期间有效的教育干预的证据一直不明确和不一致。综述的问题是:PD培训方法和教育干预如何影响成年PD患者的预后?方法采用明确的纳入和排除标准对近10年发表的文章进行叙述性回顾。检索数据库,然后与项目团队一起进行选择过程。将质量评价和最终评选结果上传到Excel中,并提取数据。然后完成对结果的叙述性描述。结果21项研究共纳入982篇文献,包括混合方法研究设计,均符合纳入标准。结果在培训方法、教育干预、患者特征、再培训和结果报告的标题下进行了描述。结论叙述性综述强调了培训期间教育干预的有力证据的差距。然而,一些证据支持调整PD培训方法,以纳入更个性化的方法,适当的培训前评估和一致的结果测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peritoneal dialysis training and interventions: A narrative review.

BackgroundPeritoneal dialysis (PD) training and education for patients and their caregivers, provided by PD nurses, are crucial for effective PD programs. The goal is to impart sufficient knowledge, skills, training, and support to minimize complications. However, the evidence regarding effective educational interventions during training has been unclear and inconsistent. The review question was: How do PD training methods and educational interventions impact on PD outcomes in adult patients?MethodsA narrative review was undertaken with defined inclusion and exclusion criteria of articles published in the last 10 years. Databases were searched, followed by a selection process conducted with the project team. Quality appraisal and a final selection were uploaded to Excel, and data was extracted. A narrative description of the results was then completed.ResultsA total of 982 articles followed the selection process of these 21 studies, including mixed methods research design, but all met the inclusion criteria. The results were described under headings of training methods, educational interventions, patient characteristics, retraining, and outcomes reported.ConclusionsThe narrative review highlights gaps in robust evidence for educational interventions during training. However, some evidence supports adapting PD training methods to incorporate more individualized approaches, appropriate pre-training assessments, and consistent outcome measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Peritoneal Dialysis International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peritoneal Dialysis International (PDI) is an international publication dedicated to peritoneal dialysis. PDI welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of peritoneal dialysis from scientists working in the peritoneal dialysis field around the world. Peritoneal Dialysis International is included in Index Medicus and indexed in Current Contents/Clinical Practice, the Science Citation Index, and Excerpta Medica (Nephrology/Urology Core Journal). It is also abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts (CA), as well as being indexed in Embase as a priority journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信