评价不同灌洗针对根管灌洗根尖清洁效果的影响——体外研究。

P Raja Rajeswari, A Andamuthu Sivakumar, J S Sivakumar, J Saravanapriyan Soundappan, M Chittrarasu, A Aravindhkumar
{"title":"评价不同灌洗针对根管灌洗根尖清洁效果的影响——体外研究。","authors":"P Raja Rajeswari, A Andamuthu Sivakumar, J S Sivakumar, J Saravanapriyan Soundappan, M Chittrarasu, A Aravindhkumar","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_40_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Irrigation is an essential part of a successful root canal treatment.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study evaluates and compares the influence of three different double-sided vented irrigation needle gauges (G) (27G, 30G, and 31G) on the apical cleaning effectiveness of endodontic irrigation using radiovisiography.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>A thorough protocol describing the objectives and methodologies of the study was submitted to the Institutional Ethics Committee, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women. Ethical clearance no. VDCW/IEC/340/2023.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Forty-five human mandibular premolars were extracted, filled with a radiopaque medium, and subjected to irrigation with three varying sizes of double-sided vented irrigation needles. Preirrigation and postirrigation radiographic images were digitally subtracted to assess the cleaned areas.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS version 27. For the purpose of intergroup comparisons, one-way analysis of variance was implemented, followed by the execution of the Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc test. Throughout the comparisons, <i>P</i> < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maximum cleaning was observed in 31G double-sided vented irrigation needles, followed by 30G and 27G double-sided vented irrigation needles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 31G double-sided vented irrigation needles exhibit a higher level of effectiveness in the cleansing of the apical third of the root canal system in comparison to the other two irrigation needle variants.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 4","pages":"336-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the influence of different irrigation needles on the apical cleaning efficacy of endodontic irrigation - An <i>in vitro</i> study.\",\"authors\":\"P Raja Rajeswari, A Andamuthu Sivakumar, J S Sivakumar, J Saravanapriyan Soundappan, M Chittrarasu, A Aravindhkumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_40_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Irrigation is an essential part of a successful root canal treatment.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study evaluates and compares the influence of three different double-sided vented irrigation needle gauges (G) (27G, 30G, and 31G) on the apical cleaning effectiveness of endodontic irrigation using radiovisiography.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>A thorough protocol describing the objectives and methodologies of the study was submitted to the Institutional Ethics Committee, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women. Ethical clearance no. VDCW/IEC/340/2023.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Forty-five human mandibular premolars were extracted, filled with a radiopaque medium, and subjected to irrigation with three varying sizes of double-sided vented irrigation needles. Preirrigation and postirrigation radiographic images were digitally subtracted to assess the cleaned areas.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS version 27. For the purpose of intergroup comparisons, one-way analysis of variance was implemented, followed by the execution of the Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc test. Throughout the comparisons, <i>P</i> < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maximum cleaning was observed in 31G double-sided vented irrigation needles, followed by 30G and 27G double-sided vented irrigation needles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 31G double-sided vented irrigation needles exhibit a higher level of effectiveness in the cleansing of the apical third of the root canal system in comparison to the other two irrigation needle variants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"336-342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037119/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_40_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_40_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:灌洗是根管治疗成功的重要组成部分。目的:本研究利用放射成像技术评价和比较三种不同的双面通气灌洗针规(G) (27G、30G和31G)对根管灌洗根尖清洁效果的影响。环境和设计:向Vivekanandha女子牙科学院机构伦理委员会提交了一份详细的方案,描述了研究的目标和方法。道德许可号码:VDCW / IEC / 340/2023。对象和方法:取45颗人下颌前磨牙,用不透射线的介质填充,用三根不同大小的双面通气冲洗针进行冲洗。冲洗前和冲洗后的x线图像被数字减去以评估清洗区域。采用统计分析:采用SPSS 27版进行统计分析。为了组间比较的目的,采用单向方差分析,然后进行Tukey诚实显著性差异事后检验。以P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:31G双面喷灌针清洗量最大,其次是30G和27G双面喷灌针。结论:与其他两种灌洗针相比,31G双面通气灌洗针在清洁根管系统的根尖三分之一方面表现出更高的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the influence of different irrigation needles on the apical cleaning efficacy of endodontic irrigation - An in vitro study.

Context: Irrigation is an essential part of a successful root canal treatment.

Aim: This study evaluates and compares the influence of three different double-sided vented irrigation needle gauges (G) (27G, 30G, and 31G) on the apical cleaning effectiveness of endodontic irrigation using radiovisiography.

Settings and design: A thorough protocol describing the objectives and methodologies of the study was submitted to the Institutional Ethics Committee, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women. Ethical clearance no. VDCW/IEC/340/2023.

Subjects and methods: Forty-five human mandibular premolars were extracted, filled with a radiopaque medium, and subjected to irrigation with three varying sizes of double-sided vented irrigation needles. Preirrigation and postirrigation radiographic images were digitally subtracted to assess the cleaned areas.

Statistical analysis used: Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS version 27. For the purpose of intergroup comparisons, one-way analysis of variance was implemented, followed by the execution of the Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc test. Throughout the comparisons, P < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

Results: Maximum cleaning was observed in 31G double-sided vented irrigation needles, followed by 30G and 27G double-sided vented irrigation needles.

Conclusions: The 31G double-sided vented irrigation needles exhibit a higher level of effectiveness in the cleansing of the apical third of the root canal system in comparison to the other two irrigation needle variants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信