人工智能与粪便免疫化学试验阳性患者的结直肠肿瘤检测性能:荟萃分析和系统评价。

Marco Spadaccini, Cesare Hassan, Yuichi Mori, Natalie Halvorsen, Antonio Z Gimeno-García, Hirotaka Nakashima, Antonio Facciorusso, Harsh K Patel, Giulio Antonelli, Kareem Khalaf, Tommy Rizkala, Daryl Ramai, Emanuele Rondonotti, Shunsuke Kamba, Roberta Maselli, Loredana Correale, Michael Bretthauer, Pradeep Bhandari, Prateek Sharma, Douglas K Rex, Alessandro Repici
{"title":"人工智能与粪便免疫化学试验阳性患者的结直肠肿瘤检测性能:荟萃分析和系统评价。","authors":"Marco Spadaccini, Cesare Hassan, Yuichi Mori, Natalie Halvorsen, Antonio Z Gimeno-García, Hirotaka Nakashima, Antonio Facciorusso, Harsh K Patel, Giulio Antonelli, Kareem Khalaf, Tommy Rizkala, Daryl Ramai, Emanuele Rondonotti, Shunsuke Kamba, Roberta Maselli, Loredana Correale, Michael Bretthauer, Pradeep Bhandari, Prateek Sharma, Douglas K Rex, Alessandro Repici","doi":"10.1111/den.15034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The combination of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) followed by colonoscopy has established itself as one of the preferred population-based screening strategies. Despite extensive exploration of various techniques and technologies, their impact on adenoma detection rate has shown inconsistency across studies in this specific setting \"FIT+ population.\" We aimed to assess the impact of the computer-aided detection (CADe) system in all randomized trials focused on this subpopulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases until September 2023 for randomized controlled trials reporting diagnostic accuracy of CADe systems for detection of colorectal neoplasia. The primary outcome was pooled adenoma detection rate, and secondary outcomes were adenoma per colonoscopy, advanced adenoma per colonoscopy, serrated lesions, and nonneoplastic per colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten randomized trials on 5421 patients were included. Adenoma detection rate was higher in the CADe group than in the standard colonoscopy group (0.62 vs. 0.52; relative risk 1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.31). CADe also resulted in higher detection performances of both adenomas (incidence rate ratio 1.16; 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.24) and serrated lesions (incidence rate ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.38) at per-polyp analysis. No differences were found for advanced adenomas between the groups. On the other hand, more nonneoplastic polyps were removed in the CADe than the standard group (0.45 vs. 0.34; mean difference 0.06; P = 0.026) in a comparable inspection time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of CADe during colonoscopy results in an increased detection of adenomas, and serrated lesions, in a FIT+ setting. The impact on advanced adenomas was not significant. Higher rates of unnecessary removal of nonneoplastic polyps were also reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":72813,"journal":{"name":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence and colorectal neoplasia detection performances in patients with positive fecal immunochemical test: Meta-analysis and systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Spadaccini, Cesare Hassan, Yuichi Mori, Natalie Halvorsen, Antonio Z Gimeno-García, Hirotaka Nakashima, Antonio Facciorusso, Harsh K Patel, Giulio Antonelli, Kareem Khalaf, Tommy Rizkala, Daryl Ramai, Emanuele Rondonotti, Shunsuke Kamba, Roberta Maselli, Loredana Correale, Michael Bretthauer, Pradeep Bhandari, Prateek Sharma, Douglas K Rex, Alessandro Repici\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/den.15034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The combination of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) followed by colonoscopy has established itself as one of the preferred population-based screening strategies. Despite extensive exploration of various techniques and technologies, their impact on adenoma detection rate has shown inconsistency across studies in this specific setting \\\"FIT+ population.\\\" We aimed to assess the impact of the computer-aided detection (CADe) system in all randomized trials focused on this subpopulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases until September 2023 for randomized controlled trials reporting diagnostic accuracy of CADe systems for detection of colorectal neoplasia. The primary outcome was pooled adenoma detection rate, and secondary outcomes were adenoma per colonoscopy, advanced adenoma per colonoscopy, serrated lesions, and nonneoplastic per colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten randomized trials on 5421 patients were included. Adenoma detection rate was higher in the CADe group than in the standard colonoscopy group (0.62 vs. 0.52; relative risk 1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.31). CADe also resulted in higher detection performances of both adenomas (incidence rate ratio 1.16; 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.24) and serrated lesions (incidence rate ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.38) at per-polyp analysis. No differences were found for advanced adenomas between the groups. On the other hand, more nonneoplastic polyps were removed in the CADe than the standard group (0.45 vs. 0.34; mean difference 0.06; P = 0.026) in a comparable inspection time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of CADe during colonoscopy results in an increased detection of adenomas, and serrated lesions, in a FIT+ setting. The impact on advanced adenomas was not significant. Higher rates of unnecessary removal of nonneoplastic polyps were also reported.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.15034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.15034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)联合结肠镜检查已成为首选的基于人群的筛查策略之一。尽管对各种技术和技术进行了广泛的探索,但它们对腺瘤检出率的影响在特定的“FIT+人群”研究中显示出不一致。我们的目的是评估计算机辅助检测(CADe)系统在所有针对该亚群的随机试验中的影响。方法:我们检索MEDLINE, EMBASE和Scopus数据库,直到2023年9月,以获得报告CADe系统检测结直肠肿瘤诊断准确性的随机对照试验。主要结果是合并腺瘤检出率,次要结果是每次结肠镜检查的腺瘤、每次结肠镜检查的晚期腺瘤、锯齿状病变和每次结肠镜检查的非肿瘤性。结果:纳入10项随机试验,共5421例患者。CADe组腺瘤检出率高于标准结肠镜组(0.62 vs 0.52;相对危险度1.19;95%置信区间1.08-1.31)。CADe对两种腺瘤的检出率也较高(发病率比1.16;95%可信区间1.09-1.24)和锯齿状病变(发病率比1.20;95%置信区间1.05-1.38)。晚期腺瘤在两组间无差异。另一方面,与标准组相比,CADe组切除的非肿瘤性息肉更多(0.45 vs. 0.34;平均差0.06;P = 0.026)。结论:在结肠镜检查中使用CADe可增加对腺瘤和锯齿状病变的检测,在FIT+设置中。对晚期腺瘤的影响不显著。非肿瘤性息肉的不必要切除率也有报道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence and colorectal neoplasia detection performances in patients with positive fecal immunochemical test: Meta-analysis and systematic review.

Objectives: The combination of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) followed by colonoscopy has established itself as one of the preferred population-based screening strategies. Despite extensive exploration of various techniques and technologies, their impact on adenoma detection rate has shown inconsistency across studies in this specific setting "FIT+ population." We aimed to assess the impact of the computer-aided detection (CADe) system in all randomized trials focused on this subpopulation.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases until September 2023 for randomized controlled trials reporting diagnostic accuracy of CADe systems for detection of colorectal neoplasia. The primary outcome was pooled adenoma detection rate, and secondary outcomes were adenoma per colonoscopy, advanced adenoma per colonoscopy, serrated lesions, and nonneoplastic per colonoscopy.

Results: Ten randomized trials on 5421 patients were included. Adenoma detection rate was higher in the CADe group than in the standard colonoscopy group (0.62 vs. 0.52; relative risk 1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.31). CADe also resulted in higher detection performances of both adenomas (incidence rate ratio 1.16; 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.24) and serrated lesions (incidence rate ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.38) at per-polyp analysis. No differences were found for advanced adenomas between the groups. On the other hand, more nonneoplastic polyps were removed in the CADe than the standard group (0.45 vs. 0.34; mean difference 0.06; P = 0.026) in a comparable inspection time.

Conclusions: The use of CADe during colonoscopy results in an increased detection of adenomas, and serrated lesions, in a FIT+ setting. The impact on advanced adenomas was not significant. Higher rates of unnecessary removal of nonneoplastic polyps were also reported.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信