疟疾中MIP-1α和MIP-1β趋化因子与疾病严重程度关系的系统综述和meta分析

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Saruda Kuraeiad, Kwuntida Uthaisar Kotepui, Aongart Mahittikorn, Nsoh Godwin Anabire, Frederick Ramirez Masangkay, Polrat Wilairatana, Kinley Wangdi, Manas Kotepui
{"title":"疟疾中MIP-1α和MIP-1β趋化因子与疾病严重程度关系的系统综述和meta分析","authors":"Saruda Kuraeiad, Kwuntida Uthaisar Kotepui, Aongart Mahittikorn, Nsoh Godwin Anabire, Frederick Ramirez Masangkay, Polrat Wilairatana, Kinley Wangdi, Manas Kotepui","doi":"10.3390/medicina61040676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: Macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α) and MIP-1β act as signaling molecules that recruit immune cells to sites of infection and inflammation. This study aimed to synthesize evidence on blood levels of MIP-1α and MIP-1β in <i>Plasmodium</i>-infected individuals and to determine whether these levels differ between severe and uncomplicated malaria cases. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024595818). Comprehensive literature searches were conducted in six databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, Ovid, Scopus, ProQuest, and PubMed) to identify studies reporting blood levels of MIP-1α and MIP-1β in <i>Plasmodium</i> infections and clinical malaria. A narrative synthesis was used to describe variations in MIP-1α and MIP-1β levels between malaria patients and controls and between severe and non-severe malaria cases. Meta-analysis was used to aggregate quantitative data utilizing a random-effects model. <i>Results</i>: A total of 1638 records were identified, with 20 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Most studies reported significantly higher MIP-1α and MIP-1β levels in malaria patients compared to non-malarial controls. The meta-analysis showed a significant elevation in MIP-1α levels in malaria patients (<i>n</i> = 352) compared to uninfected individuals (<i>n</i> = 274) (<i>p</i> = 0.0112, random effects model, standardized mean difference [SMD]: 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38 to 3.00, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 96.0%, five studies, 626 individuals). The meta-analysis showed no difference in MIP-1α levels between severe malaria cases (<i>n</i> = 203) and uncomplicated cases (<i>n</i> = 106) (<i>p</i> = 0.51, SMD: -0.48, 95% CI: -1.93 to 0.96, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 97.3%, three studies, 309 individuals). <i>Conclusions</i>: This study suggests that while MIP-1α and MIP-1β levels are elevated in malaria patients compared to uninfected individuals, these chemokines show a limited ability to differentiate between severe and uncomplicated malaria or predict severe outcomes. Further research is needed to clarify their role in malaria pathogenesis and explore potential clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"61 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12028554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of MIP-1α and MIP-1β Chemokines in Malaria in Relation to Disease Severity.\",\"authors\":\"Saruda Kuraeiad, Kwuntida Uthaisar Kotepui, Aongart Mahittikorn, Nsoh Godwin Anabire, Frederick Ramirez Masangkay, Polrat Wilairatana, Kinley Wangdi, Manas Kotepui\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medicina61040676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: Macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α) and MIP-1β act as signaling molecules that recruit immune cells to sites of infection and inflammation. This study aimed to synthesize evidence on blood levels of MIP-1α and MIP-1β in <i>Plasmodium</i>-infected individuals and to determine whether these levels differ between severe and uncomplicated malaria cases. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024595818). Comprehensive literature searches were conducted in six databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, Ovid, Scopus, ProQuest, and PubMed) to identify studies reporting blood levels of MIP-1α and MIP-1β in <i>Plasmodium</i> infections and clinical malaria. A narrative synthesis was used to describe variations in MIP-1α and MIP-1β levels between malaria patients and controls and between severe and non-severe malaria cases. Meta-analysis was used to aggregate quantitative data utilizing a random-effects model. <i>Results</i>: A total of 1638 records were identified, with 20 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Most studies reported significantly higher MIP-1α and MIP-1β levels in malaria patients compared to non-malarial controls. The meta-analysis showed a significant elevation in MIP-1α levels in malaria patients (<i>n</i> = 352) compared to uninfected individuals (<i>n</i> = 274) (<i>p</i> = 0.0112, random effects model, standardized mean difference [SMD]: 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38 to 3.00, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 96.0%, five studies, 626 individuals). The meta-analysis showed no difference in MIP-1α levels between severe malaria cases (<i>n</i> = 203) and uncomplicated cases (<i>n</i> = 106) (<i>p</i> = 0.51, SMD: -0.48, 95% CI: -1.93 to 0.96, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 97.3%, three studies, 309 individuals). <i>Conclusions</i>: This study suggests that while MIP-1α and MIP-1β levels are elevated in malaria patients compared to uninfected individuals, these chemokines show a limited ability to differentiate between severe and uncomplicated malaria or predict severe outcomes. Further research is needed to clarify their role in malaria pathogenesis and explore potential clinical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina-Lithuania\",\"volume\":\"61 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12028554/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina-Lithuania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61040676\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61040676","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:巨噬细胞炎症蛋白-1α (MIP-1α)和MIP-1β作为信号分子,将免疫细胞招募到感染和炎症部位。本研究旨在综合疟原虫感染个体血液中MIP-1α和MIP-1β水平的证据,并确定这些水平在严重和非复杂疟疾病例之间是否存在差异。材料和方法:研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024595818)。在六个数据库(EMBASE、MEDLINE、Ovid、Scopus、ProQuest和PubMed)中进行了全面的文献检索,以确定在疟原虫感染和临床疟疾中报告血液中MIP-1α和MIP-1β水平的研究。采用叙述性综合方法描述疟疾患者和对照组以及重症和非重症疟疾病例之间MIP-1α和MIP-1β水平的差异。meta分析采用随机效应模型汇总定量数据。结果:共纳入文献1638篇,符合纳入标准的文献20篇。大多数研究报告,与非疟疾对照组相比,疟疾患者的MIP-1α和MIP-1β水平显著升高。meta分析显示,疟疾患者(n = 352)与未感染人群(n = 274)相比,mmp -1α水平显著升高(p = 0.0112,随机效应模型,标准化平均差[SMD]: 1.69, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.38 ~ 3.00, I2: 96.0%, 5项研究,626人)。meta分析显示重症疟疾病例(n = 203)与非重症疟疾病例(n = 106)的MIP-1α水平无差异(p = 0.51, SMD: -0.48, 95% CI: -1.93 ~ 0.96, I2: 97.3%, 3项研究,309例)。结论:这项研究表明,虽然与未感染疟疾的个体相比,疟疾患者的MIP-1α和MIP-1β水平升高,但这些趋化因子在区分严重和非复杂疟疾或预测严重后果方面的能力有限。需要进一步的研究来阐明它们在疟疾发病机制中的作用并探索潜在的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of MIP-1α and MIP-1β Chemokines in Malaria in Relation to Disease Severity.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of MIP-1α and MIP-1β Chemokines in Malaria in Relation to Disease Severity.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of MIP-1α and MIP-1β Chemokines in Malaria in Relation to Disease Severity.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of MIP-1α and MIP-1β Chemokines in Malaria in Relation to Disease Severity.

Background and Objectives: Macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α) and MIP-1β act as signaling molecules that recruit immune cells to sites of infection and inflammation. This study aimed to synthesize evidence on blood levels of MIP-1α and MIP-1β in Plasmodium-infected individuals and to determine whether these levels differ between severe and uncomplicated malaria cases. Materials and Methods: The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024595818). Comprehensive literature searches were conducted in six databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, Ovid, Scopus, ProQuest, and PubMed) to identify studies reporting blood levels of MIP-1α and MIP-1β in Plasmodium infections and clinical malaria. A narrative synthesis was used to describe variations in MIP-1α and MIP-1β levels between malaria patients and controls and between severe and non-severe malaria cases. Meta-analysis was used to aggregate quantitative data utilizing a random-effects model. Results: A total of 1638 records were identified, with 20 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Most studies reported significantly higher MIP-1α and MIP-1β levels in malaria patients compared to non-malarial controls. The meta-analysis showed a significant elevation in MIP-1α levels in malaria patients (n = 352) compared to uninfected individuals (n = 274) (p = 0.0112, random effects model, standardized mean difference [SMD]: 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38 to 3.00, I2: 96.0%, five studies, 626 individuals). The meta-analysis showed no difference in MIP-1α levels between severe malaria cases (n = 203) and uncomplicated cases (n = 106) (p = 0.51, SMD: -0.48, 95% CI: -1.93 to 0.96, I2: 97.3%, three studies, 309 individuals). Conclusions: This study suggests that while MIP-1α and MIP-1β levels are elevated in malaria patients compared to uninfected individuals, these chemokines show a limited ability to differentiate between severe and uncomplicated malaria or predict severe outcomes. Further research is needed to clarify their role in malaria pathogenesis and explore potential clinical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信