在慢性肾脏疾病和终末期肾脏疾病人群中,多模态成像对手术建立动静脉瘘和动静脉移植物计划的作用。

Abdullah Khan, Daniel Raskin, Sasan Partovi, Lee Kirksey
{"title":"在慢性肾脏疾病和终末期肾脏疾病人群中,多模态成像对手术建立动静脉瘘和动静脉移植物计划的作用。","authors":"Abdullah Khan, Daniel Raskin, Sasan Partovi, Lee Kirksey","doi":"10.1007/s10554-025-03356-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review explores a range of imaging techniques used in the pre-surgical planning of vascular access, including duplex ultrasound (DUS), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), digital subtraction venography (DSV), CO2 Venography, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). For each modality, we analyze its technical background, applications, advantages and disadvantages, and comparisons with alternative imaging options. DUS is the most widely used imaging modality in pre-surgical planning due to its low cost, non-invasiveness, absence of ionizing radiation and nephrotoxic contrast agents, and comparable accuracy in pre-access mapping with other methods. DSA and DSV have high sensitivity and specificity to visualize the arterial and venous system and are recommended when central vascular stenosis is suspected, or a simultaneous intervention is anticipated. However, their use is limited due to exposure to contrast agents and ionizing radiation. CO2-based contrast agents provide an alternative for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients to preserve residual renal function. MRA provides a noninvasive option with no radiation exposure and superior image resolution, yet the high cost and limited availability restrict their widespread clinical use. CTA, with its short acquisition time and high-resolution imaging, is a vital modality in intricate cases. However, radiation and contrast exposure can pose challenges in this patient population. The newer IVUS modality has a superior ability to central venous outflow obstruction compared to DSA and provides more information regarding vascular geometry and anatomy. Each imaging modality has its unique advantages and disadvantages in this patient cohort. The decision to use a particular imaging must be made on a case-to-case basis. However, following KDOQI guidelines, a combination of a patient's medical history, physical examination, and DUS is a widely accepted standard practice in pre-surgical vascular access planning, with other imaging modalities reserved for selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of multimodality imaging pre-access for planning of surgical creation of arteriovenous fistulas and arteriovenous grafts in the chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease population.\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Khan, Daniel Raskin, Sasan Partovi, Lee Kirksey\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10554-025-03356-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review explores a range of imaging techniques used in the pre-surgical planning of vascular access, including duplex ultrasound (DUS), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), digital subtraction venography (DSV), CO2 Venography, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). For each modality, we analyze its technical background, applications, advantages and disadvantages, and comparisons with alternative imaging options. DUS is the most widely used imaging modality in pre-surgical planning due to its low cost, non-invasiveness, absence of ionizing radiation and nephrotoxic contrast agents, and comparable accuracy in pre-access mapping with other methods. DSA and DSV have high sensitivity and specificity to visualize the arterial and venous system and are recommended when central vascular stenosis is suspected, or a simultaneous intervention is anticipated. However, their use is limited due to exposure to contrast agents and ionizing radiation. CO2-based contrast agents provide an alternative for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients to preserve residual renal function. MRA provides a noninvasive option with no radiation exposure and superior image resolution, yet the high cost and limited availability restrict their widespread clinical use. CTA, with its short acquisition time and high-resolution imaging, is a vital modality in intricate cases. However, radiation and contrast exposure can pose challenges in this patient population. The newer IVUS modality has a superior ability to central venous outflow obstruction compared to DSA and provides more information regarding vascular geometry and anatomy. Each imaging modality has its unique advantages and disadvantages in this patient cohort. The decision to use a particular imaging must be made on a case-to-case basis. However, following KDOQI guidelines, a combination of a patient's medical history, physical examination, and DUS is a widely accepted standard practice in pre-surgical vascular access planning, with other imaging modalities reserved for selected patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03356-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03356-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文综述了用于术前血管通路规划的一系列成像技术,包括双工超声(DUS)、数字减影血管造影(DSA)、数字减影静脉造影(DSV)、CO2静脉造影、磁共振血管造影(MRA)、计算机断层血管造影(CTA)和血管内超声(IVUS)。对于每种模式,我们分析了其技术背景,应用,优缺点,并与替代成像选项进行了比较。DUS因其成本低、无创、不需要电离辐射和肾毒性造影剂,且与其他方法在术前造影术中的准确性相当,是术前规划中应用最广泛的成像方式。DSA和DSV在显示动脉和静脉系统方面具有很高的敏感性和特异性,当怀疑中枢性血管狭窄或预期同时进行干预时,建议使用DSA和DSV。然而,由于暴露于造影剂和电离辐射,它们的使用受到限制。基于二氧化碳的造影剂为终末期肾病(ESRD)患者提供了一种保留残余肾功能的替代方法。MRA提供了一种非侵入性的选择,没有辐射暴露和优越的图像分辨率,但高成本和有限的可用性限制了它们在临床的广泛应用。CTA以其采集时间短、成像分辨率高的特点,在复杂病例中具有重要的应用价值。然而,辐射和造影剂暴露可能对这类患者构成挑战。与DSA相比,新的IVUS模式具有更好的中心静脉流出阻塞能力,并提供更多关于血管几何和解剖的信息。在该患者队列中,每种成像方式都有其独特的优点和缺点。使用特定影像的决定必须根据具体情况而定。然而,根据KDOQI的指导方针,结合患者的病史、体格检查和DUS是术前血管通路规划中被广泛接受的标准做法,其他成像方式保留给选定的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of multimodality imaging pre-access for planning of surgical creation of arteriovenous fistulas and arteriovenous grafts in the chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease population.

This review explores a range of imaging techniques used in the pre-surgical planning of vascular access, including duplex ultrasound (DUS), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), digital subtraction venography (DSV), CO2 Venography, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). For each modality, we analyze its technical background, applications, advantages and disadvantages, and comparisons with alternative imaging options. DUS is the most widely used imaging modality in pre-surgical planning due to its low cost, non-invasiveness, absence of ionizing radiation and nephrotoxic contrast agents, and comparable accuracy in pre-access mapping with other methods. DSA and DSV have high sensitivity and specificity to visualize the arterial and venous system and are recommended when central vascular stenosis is suspected, or a simultaneous intervention is anticipated. However, their use is limited due to exposure to contrast agents and ionizing radiation. CO2-based contrast agents provide an alternative for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients to preserve residual renal function. MRA provides a noninvasive option with no radiation exposure and superior image resolution, yet the high cost and limited availability restrict their widespread clinical use. CTA, with its short acquisition time and high-resolution imaging, is a vital modality in intricate cases. However, radiation and contrast exposure can pose challenges in this patient population. The newer IVUS modality has a superior ability to central venous outflow obstruction compared to DSA and provides more information regarding vascular geometry and anatomy. Each imaging modality has its unique advantages and disadvantages in this patient cohort. The decision to use a particular imaging must be made on a case-to-case basis. However, following KDOQI guidelines, a combination of a patient's medical history, physical examination, and DUS is a widely accepted standard practice in pre-surgical vascular access planning, with other imaging modalities reserved for selected patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信