评估一种新型可弯曲尖端输尿管导管鞘与综合吸引:一项体外研究。

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mario Basulto-Martínez, John Denstedt
{"title":"评估一种新型可弯曲尖端输尿管导管鞘与综合吸引:一项体外研究。","authors":"Mario Basulto-Martínez, John Denstedt","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01753-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical management of urinary stones has significantly evolved with the advent of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. For lower pole stones larger than 1 cm, the choice between fURS and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy remains debated. fURS with ureteric access sheaths (UAS) is a widely utilized technique, but fragment clearance is challenging in unfavorable anatomical conditions and/or lower pole stones. This study compares a novel flexible suction UAS (FANS) with a standard UAS in an in vitro model of lower pole stones. An in vitro experiment was conducted using an anatomical model of the urinary tract with artificial stones simulating complex 1-cm lower pole stones. Fourteen procedures were performed using either a 12/14 Fr diameter standard UAS or FANS. Every experiment was performed by a single surgeon using a 8.4 Fr single-use digital flexible ureteroscope and holmium:YAG laser set at 0.5 J, 25 Hz, and short pulse with a 272 μm fiber. Operative times, stone clearance rates, lasering times, were recorded and the residual stone masses (> 2 mm) was quantified. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 5 out of 7 procedures using FANS while no complete stone clearance was achieved using the standard UAS. The median laser time [27:33 (26:06-28:24) vs 24:02 (21:25-25:04) mm:ss, p = 0.017] and total energy output energy [20663 (19,575-21,325) vs 18,270 (16,069-18,931) J, p = 0.017] were significantly lower in the FANS group (p = 0.017), and the operative time was comparable. This in vitro experiment suggests that fURS with novel FANS may improve stone clearance and improve laser efficiency when compared to the standard UAS, without increasing operative times. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of a novel bendable-tip ureteral access sheath with integrated suction: an in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Mario Basulto-Martínez, John Denstedt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00240-025-01753-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Surgical management of urinary stones has significantly evolved with the advent of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. For lower pole stones larger than 1 cm, the choice between fURS and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy remains debated. fURS with ureteric access sheaths (UAS) is a widely utilized technique, but fragment clearance is challenging in unfavorable anatomical conditions and/or lower pole stones. This study compares a novel flexible suction UAS (FANS) with a standard UAS in an in vitro model of lower pole stones. An in vitro experiment was conducted using an anatomical model of the urinary tract with artificial stones simulating complex 1-cm lower pole stones. Fourteen procedures were performed using either a 12/14 Fr diameter standard UAS or FANS. Every experiment was performed by a single surgeon using a 8.4 Fr single-use digital flexible ureteroscope and holmium:YAG laser set at 0.5 J, 25 Hz, and short pulse with a 272 μm fiber. Operative times, stone clearance rates, lasering times, were recorded and the residual stone masses (> 2 mm) was quantified. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 5 out of 7 procedures using FANS while no complete stone clearance was achieved using the standard UAS. The median laser time [27:33 (26:06-28:24) vs 24:02 (21:25-25:04) mm:ss, p = 0.017] and total energy output energy [20663 (19,575-21,325) vs 18,270 (16,069-18,931) J, p = 0.017] were significantly lower in the FANS group (p = 0.017), and the operative time was comparable. This in vitro experiment suggests that fURS with novel FANS may improve stone clearance and improve laser efficiency when compared to the standard UAS, without increasing operative times. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01753-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01753-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着体外冲击波碎石术、柔性输尿管镜检查(fURS)和经皮肾镜取石术的出现,泌尿结石的外科治疗有了显著的发展。对于大于1cm的下极结石,fURS和小型化经皮肾镜取石术的选择仍有争议。输尿管通路鞘(UAS)的fURS是广泛应用的技术,但碎片清除在不利的解剖条件和/或下极结石是具有挑战性的。本研究比较了一种新型柔性吸吸UAS (FANS)与标准UAS在体外下极结石模型中的应用。体外实验采用人工结石泌尿道解剖模型模拟复杂的1厘米下极结石。使用12/ 14fr直径标准UAS或FANS进行了14次手术。每个实验均由一名外科医生完成,使用8.4 Fr一次性数字输尿管镜和钬激光,激光功率为0.5 J, 25 Hz,短脉冲,光纤长度为272 μm。记录手术次数、结石清除率、激光照射次数,并定量观察残余结石(bbb20 mm)。使用FANS在7次手术中有5次实现了完全的结石清除,而使用标准UAS没有实现完全的结石清除。中位激光时间[27:33 (26:06-28:24)vs 24:02 (21:25-25:04) mm:ss, p = 0.017]和总能量输出能量[20663 (19,575-21,325)vs 18,270 (16,069-18,931) J, p = 0.017]明显低于FANS组(p = 0.017),手术时间具有可比性。体外实验表明,与标准UAS相比,新型FANS的fURS可以改善结石清除和提高激光效率,而不增加手术次数。需要进一步的临床试验来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of a novel bendable-tip ureteral access sheath with integrated suction: an in vitro study.

Surgical management of urinary stones has significantly evolved with the advent of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. For lower pole stones larger than 1 cm, the choice between fURS and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy remains debated. fURS with ureteric access sheaths (UAS) is a widely utilized technique, but fragment clearance is challenging in unfavorable anatomical conditions and/or lower pole stones. This study compares a novel flexible suction UAS (FANS) with a standard UAS in an in vitro model of lower pole stones. An in vitro experiment was conducted using an anatomical model of the urinary tract with artificial stones simulating complex 1-cm lower pole stones. Fourteen procedures were performed using either a 12/14 Fr diameter standard UAS or FANS. Every experiment was performed by a single surgeon using a 8.4 Fr single-use digital flexible ureteroscope and holmium:YAG laser set at 0.5 J, 25 Hz, and short pulse with a 272 μm fiber. Operative times, stone clearance rates, lasering times, were recorded and the residual stone masses (> 2 mm) was quantified. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 5 out of 7 procedures using FANS while no complete stone clearance was achieved using the standard UAS. The median laser time [27:33 (26:06-28:24) vs 24:02 (21:25-25:04) mm:ss, p = 0.017] and total energy output energy [20663 (19,575-21,325) vs 18,270 (16,069-18,931) J, p = 0.017] were significantly lower in the FANS group (p = 0.017), and the operative time was comparable. This in vitro experiment suggests that fURS with novel FANS may improve stone clearance and improve laser efficiency when compared to the standard UAS, without increasing operative times. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信