结合棘旁肌质量的可解释机器学习模型的开发和验证,以预测后路腰椎椎间融合术后椎笼下沉风险。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-05-07 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005388
Haifu Sun, Wenxiang Tang, Lei Deng, Xingyu You, Zhairui Shen, Xiao Sun, Jun Zou, Fanguo Lin, Zhonglai Qian, Huilin Yang, Hao Liu
{"title":"结合棘旁肌质量的可解释机器学习模型的开发和验证,以预测后路腰椎椎间融合术后椎笼下沉风险。","authors":"Haifu Sun, Wenxiang Tang, Lei Deng, Xingyu You, Zhairui Shen, Xiao Sun, Jun Zou, Fanguo Lin, Zhonglai Qian, Huilin Yang, Hao Liu","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A real-world, multicenter retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify independent risk factors for cage subsidence following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) and develop an interpretable machine learning model for risk prediction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with degenerative lumbar disease who underwent single-level PLIF (January 2018-October 2023) were retrospectively included. A training set (n=620) came from the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, and a validation set (n=100) from the Second Affiliated Hospital. Cage subsidence (≥2 mm intervertebral height loss) was assessed radiographically. Parameters included paraspinal muscle indices (Psoas Muscle Index [PMI], Multifidus Muscle Index [MM]), Fat Infiltration [FI]), bone density markers (Hounsfield Unit [HU] value, Vertebral Bone Quality [VBQ], Endplate Bone Quality [EBQ]), cage position, and postoperative alignment. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors; multiple machine learning models were developed and evaluated. A web-based tool was created for clinical deployment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analysis identified PMI, FI, HU value, VBQ, cage position, cage height, postoperative Intervertebral Height (IH), corrected IH, and corrected SA as independent risk factors for cage subsidence. Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) outperformed other models, achieving the highest AUC (0.9752), accuracy (0.92), and F1-score (0.9216), with the lowest Brier score (0.0660). After excluding indicators related to paravertebral muscle function from the prediction model, the predictive accuracy of the model decreased substantially. (SHapley Additive exPlanations) SHAP analysis confirmed VBQ, PMI, BMI, and EBQ as the most influential predictors. The final model was deployed as a web-based tool for real-time clinical risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key risk factors for PLIF cage subsidence were identified, and a validated machine learning model was developed. The high-performance LightGBM model, deployed in a user-friendly web application, enables spine surgeons to optimize surgical planning and reduce subsidence risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of Interpretable Machine Learning Models Incorporating Paraspinal Muscle Quality to Predict Cage Subsidence Risk Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Haifu Sun, Wenxiang Tang, Lei Deng, Xingyu You, Zhairui Shen, Xiao Sun, Jun Zou, Fanguo Lin, Zhonglai Qian, Huilin Yang, Hao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A real-world, multicenter retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify independent risk factors for cage subsidence following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) and develop an interpretable machine learning model for risk prediction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with degenerative lumbar disease who underwent single-level PLIF (January 2018-October 2023) were retrospectively included. A training set (n=620) came from the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, and a validation set (n=100) from the Second Affiliated Hospital. Cage subsidence (≥2 mm intervertebral height loss) was assessed radiographically. Parameters included paraspinal muscle indices (Psoas Muscle Index [PMI], Multifidus Muscle Index [MM]), Fat Infiltration [FI]), bone density markers (Hounsfield Unit [HU] value, Vertebral Bone Quality [VBQ], Endplate Bone Quality [EBQ]), cage position, and postoperative alignment. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors; multiple machine learning models were developed and evaluated. A web-based tool was created for clinical deployment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analysis identified PMI, FI, HU value, VBQ, cage position, cage height, postoperative Intervertebral Height (IH), corrected IH, and corrected SA as independent risk factors for cage subsidence. Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) outperformed other models, achieving the highest AUC (0.9752), accuracy (0.92), and F1-score (0.9216), with the lowest Brier score (0.0660). After excluding indicators related to paravertebral muscle function from the prediction model, the predictive accuracy of the model decreased substantially. (SHapley Additive exPlanations) SHAP analysis confirmed VBQ, PMI, BMI, and EBQ as the most influential predictors. The final model was deployed as a web-based tool for real-time clinical risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key risk factors for PLIF cage subsidence were identified, and a validated machine learning model was developed. The high-performance LightGBM model, deployed in a user-friendly web application, enables spine surgeons to optimize surgical planning and reduce subsidence risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005388\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:真实世界、多中心回顾性研究。目的:确定后路腰椎椎体间融合术(PLIF)后笼子下沉的独立危险因素,并建立可解释的机器学习模型用于风险预测。材料和方法:回顾性纳入2018年1月至2023年10月期间接受单节段PLIF治疗的退行性腰椎疾病患者。训练集(n=620)来自东吴大学第一附属医院,验证集(n=100)来自东吴大学第二附属医院。椎体沉降(椎间高度损失≥2mm)采用放射学评估。参数包括棘旁肌指数(腰肌指数[PMI]、多裂肌指数[MM])、脂肪浸润率[FI])、骨密度指标(Hounsfield单位[HU]值、椎体骨质量[VBQ]、终板骨质量[EBQ])、cage位置和术后对齐。多因素logistic回归确定危险因素;开发和评估了多个机器学习模型。为临床部署创建了一个基于web的工具。结果:多因素分析发现PMI、FI、HU值、VBQ、笼位、笼高、术后椎间高度(IH)、矫正IH、矫正SA是笼沉降的独立危险因素。光梯度增强机(Light Gradient Boosting Machine, LightGBM)的AUC最高(0.9752),准确率最高(0.92),f1评分最高(0.9216),Brier评分最低(0.0660)。在预测模型中剔除与椎旁肌功能相关的指标后,模型的预测准确率大幅下降。SHAP分析证实VBQ、PMI、BMI和EBQ是最具影响力的预测因子。最终的模型被部署为基于网络的实时临床风险评估工具。结论:确定了PLIF笼沉降的关键危险因素,并开发了经过验证的机器学习模型。高性能的LightGBM模型部署在用户友好的web应用程序中,使脊柱外科医生能够优化手术计划并降低下沉风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of Interpretable Machine Learning Models Incorporating Paraspinal Muscle Quality to Predict Cage Subsidence Risk Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Study design: A real-world, multicenter retrospective study.

Objective: To identify independent risk factors for cage subsidence following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) and develop an interpretable machine learning model for risk prediction.

Materials and methods: Patients with degenerative lumbar disease who underwent single-level PLIF (January 2018-October 2023) were retrospectively included. A training set (n=620) came from the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, and a validation set (n=100) from the Second Affiliated Hospital. Cage subsidence (≥2 mm intervertebral height loss) was assessed radiographically. Parameters included paraspinal muscle indices (Psoas Muscle Index [PMI], Multifidus Muscle Index [MM]), Fat Infiltration [FI]), bone density markers (Hounsfield Unit [HU] value, Vertebral Bone Quality [VBQ], Endplate Bone Quality [EBQ]), cage position, and postoperative alignment. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors; multiple machine learning models were developed and evaluated. A web-based tool was created for clinical deployment.

Results: Multivariate analysis identified PMI, FI, HU value, VBQ, cage position, cage height, postoperative Intervertebral Height (IH), corrected IH, and corrected SA as independent risk factors for cage subsidence. Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) outperformed other models, achieving the highest AUC (0.9752), accuracy (0.92), and F1-score (0.9216), with the lowest Brier score (0.0660). After excluding indicators related to paravertebral muscle function from the prediction model, the predictive accuracy of the model decreased substantially. (SHapley Additive exPlanations) SHAP analysis confirmed VBQ, PMI, BMI, and EBQ as the most influential predictors. The final model was deployed as a web-based tool for real-time clinical risk assessment.

Conclusions: Key risk factors for PLIF cage subsidence were identified, and a validated machine learning model was developed. The high-performance LightGBM model, deployed in a user-friendly web application, enables spine surgeons to optimize surgical planning and reduce subsidence risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信