分剂量顺铂新辅助化疗后机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的意义。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY
Translational andrology and urology Pub Date : 2025-03-30 Epub Date: 2025-03-26 DOI:10.21037/tau-2024-662
Keita Nakane, Ayaka Okamoto, Hiroki Kato, Hiroki Hoshino, Teppei Nishiwaki, Torai Enomoto, Masayuki Tomioka, Tomoki Taniguchi, Makoto Kawase, Kota Kawase, Daiki Kato, Koji Iinuma, Yuki Tobisawa, Takuya Koie
{"title":"分剂量顺铂新辅助化疗后机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的意义。","authors":"Keita Nakane, Ayaka Okamoto, Hiroki Kato, Hiroki Hoshino, Teppei Nishiwaki, Torai Enomoto, Masayuki Tomioka, Tomoki Taniguchi, Makoto Kawase, Kota Kawase, Daiki Kato, Koji Iinuma, Yuki Tobisawa, Takuya Koie","doi":"10.21037/tau-2024-662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although cisplatin is essential for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), good renal function is a prerequisite for those patients receiving NAC. However, patients with normal renal function may experience nephrotoxicity after cisplatin administration. We investigated the safety and efficacy of a split-dose regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin (split-dose GC) in MIBC patients with normal renal function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 45 patients with MIBC who received standard GC, split-dose GC, or gemcitabine and carboplatin (GCarbo) as a NAC and subsequently underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy. The efficacy and safety of two cycles split-dose GC were compared with those of other regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 45 patients with MIBC, 14 received standard GC, 14 received split-dose GC, and 17 received GCarbo. Pathological complete response rates were 28.6%, 21.4%, and 29.4% for surgical specimens obtained post-treatment with standard GC, split-dose GC, and GCarbo, respectively (P=0.86). Renal function after NAC was significantly lower in the standard- and split-dose GC groups than in the GCarbo group (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the split-dose GC regimen showed a significant reduction compared to pre-treatment renal function, the pathological response rate and incidence of adverse events were similar to those of the other two regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"14 3","pages":"589-601"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significance of split-dose cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by robotic-assisted radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Keita Nakane, Ayaka Okamoto, Hiroki Kato, Hiroki Hoshino, Teppei Nishiwaki, Torai Enomoto, Masayuki Tomioka, Tomoki Taniguchi, Makoto Kawase, Kota Kawase, Daiki Kato, Koji Iinuma, Yuki Tobisawa, Takuya Koie\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tau-2024-662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although cisplatin is essential for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), good renal function is a prerequisite for those patients receiving NAC. However, patients with normal renal function may experience nephrotoxicity after cisplatin administration. We investigated the safety and efficacy of a split-dose regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin (split-dose GC) in MIBC patients with normal renal function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 45 patients with MIBC who received standard GC, split-dose GC, or gemcitabine and carboplatin (GCarbo) as a NAC and subsequently underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy. The efficacy and safety of two cycles split-dose GC were compared with those of other regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 45 patients with MIBC, 14 received standard GC, 14 received split-dose GC, and 17 received GCarbo. Pathological complete response rates were 28.6%, 21.4%, and 29.4% for surgical specimens obtained post-treatment with standard GC, split-dose GC, and GCarbo, respectively (P=0.86). Renal function after NAC was significantly lower in the standard- and split-dose GC groups than in the GCarbo group (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the split-dose GC regimen showed a significant reduction compared to pre-treatment renal function, the pathological response rate and incidence of adverse events were similar to those of the other two regimens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"589-601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986500/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2024-662\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2024-662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然顺铂是肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者新辅助化疗(NAC)的必需药物,但良好的肾功能是接受NAC的患者的先决条件。然而,肾功能正常的患者服用顺铂后可能出现肾毒性。我们研究了吉西他滨和顺铂分剂量方案(分剂量GC)在肾功能正常的MIBC患者中的安全性和有效性。方法:这项回顾性研究包括45例MIBC患者,他们接受了标准GC、分剂量GC或吉西他滨加卡铂(GCarbo)作为NAC,随后接受了机器人辅助的根治性膀胱切除术。比较两周期分剂量气相色谱与其他方案的疗效和安全性。结果:45例MIBC患者中,14例采用标准GC, 14例采用分剂量GC, 17例采用GCarbo。标准GC、分剂量GC和GCarbo治疗后手术标本的病理完全缓解率分别为28.6%、21.4%和29.4% (P=0.86)。标准剂量和分剂量GC组NAC后肾功能明显低于GCarbo组(p结论:虽然分剂量GC方案较治疗前肾功能明显降低,但病理反应率和不良事件发生率与其他两种方案相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Significance of split-dose cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by robotic-assisted radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Background: Although cisplatin is essential for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), good renal function is a prerequisite for those patients receiving NAC. However, patients with normal renal function may experience nephrotoxicity after cisplatin administration. We investigated the safety and efficacy of a split-dose regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin (split-dose GC) in MIBC patients with normal renal function.

Methods: This retrospective study included 45 patients with MIBC who received standard GC, split-dose GC, or gemcitabine and carboplatin (GCarbo) as a NAC and subsequently underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy. The efficacy and safety of two cycles split-dose GC were compared with those of other regimens.

Results: Among the 45 patients with MIBC, 14 received standard GC, 14 received split-dose GC, and 17 received GCarbo. Pathological complete response rates were 28.6%, 21.4%, and 29.4% for surgical specimens obtained post-treatment with standard GC, split-dose GC, and GCarbo, respectively (P=0.86). Renal function after NAC was significantly lower in the standard- and split-dose GC groups than in the GCarbo group (P<0.001).

Conclusions: Although the split-dose GC regimen showed a significant reduction compared to pre-treatment renal function, the pathological response rate and incidence of adverse events were similar to those of the other two regimens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信