T1a肾细胞癌远处转移的手术方式和预测因素的预后:SEER数据库分析

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY
Translational andrology and urology Pub Date : 2025-03-30 Epub Date: 2025-03-26 DOI:10.21037/tau-2024-637
Cong Tian, Jun Liu, Yueyao Wang, Lizhe An, Yang Hong, Haopu Hu, Mingrui Wang, Xiaolong Bian, Jinhui Lai, Hao Hu
{"title":"T1a肾细胞癌远处转移的手术方式和预测因素的预后:SEER数据库分析","authors":"Cong Tian, Jun Liu, Yueyao Wang, Lizhe An, Yang Hong, Haopu Hu, Mingrui Wang, Xiaolong Bian, Jinhui Lai, Hao Hu","doi":"10.21037/tau-2024-637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distant metastases can still occur in T1a renal cancer. There is no conclusive evidence to determine whether cytoreductive partial nephrectomy (cPN) or cytoreductive radical nephrectomy (cRN) is superior in managing primary renal lesions. This study aimed to compare survival outcomes between cPN and cRN in pathological T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with distant metastases and to develop a predictive model for metastasis risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>T1a RCC patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Prognostic comparisons were made using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the risk factors for distant metastases in T1a RCC, leading to the development of a predictive model. The model's performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 55,957 RCC patients with pathologic T1a, of which 1,496 (2.67%) with distant metastases. Metastatic patients exhibited significantly worse overall survival (OS) than non-metastatic counterparts (P<0.001). There was no notable difference in OS between cPN and cRN (P=0.11). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified advanced age, male gender, poor histological differentiation, sarcomatoid features, capsular invasion, and lymph node metastasis as independent risk factors for distant metastases in RCC patients with stage T1a. The predictive model established on these factors demonstrated performance with an area under the curve of 0.789.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference in OS between cPN and cRN. Advanced age, male gender, poor histological differentiation, capsular invasion, sarcomatoid features, and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for distant metastases in RCC patients with stage T1a.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"14 3","pages":"669-677"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic outcomes of surgical modalities and predictive factors for distant metastases in T1a renal cell carcinoma: a SEER database analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Cong Tian, Jun Liu, Yueyao Wang, Lizhe An, Yang Hong, Haopu Hu, Mingrui Wang, Xiaolong Bian, Jinhui Lai, Hao Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tau-2024-637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distant metastases can still occur in T1a renal cancer. There is no conclusive evidence to determine whether cytoreductive partial nephrectomy (cPN) or cytoreductive radical nephrectomy (cRN) is superior in managing primary renal lesions. This study aimed to compare survival outcomes between cPN and cRN in pathological T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with distant metastases and to develop a predictive model for metastasis risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>T1a RCC patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Prognostic comparisons were made using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the risk factors for distant metastases in T1a RCC, leading to the development of a predictive model. The model's performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 55,957 RCC patients with pathologic T1a, of which 1,496 (2.67%) with distant metastases. Metastatic patients exhibited significantly worse overall survival (OS) than non-metastatic counterparts (P<0.001). There was no notable difference in OS between cPN and cRN (P=0.11). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified advanced age, male gender, poor histological differentiation, sarcomatoid features, capsular invasion, and lymph node metastasis as independent risk factors for distant metastases in RCC patients with stage T1a. The predictive model established on these factors demonstrated performance with an area under the curve of 0.789.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference in OS between cPN and cRN. Advanced age, male gender, poor histological differentiation, capsular invasion, sarcomatoid features, and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for distant metastases in RCC patients with stage T1a.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"669-677\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986472/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2024-637\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2024-637","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:T1a肾癌仍可发生远处转移。目前还没有确凿的证据表明细胞减少性部分肾切除术(cPN)和细胞减少性根治性肾切除术(cRN)在治疗原发性肾脏病变方面孰优孰优。本研究旨在比较病理T1a肾细胞癌(RCC)远处转移患者的cPN和cRN的生存结果,并建立转移风险分层的预测模型。方法:从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中提取T1a RCC患者。采用Kaplan-Meier分析进行预后比较。通过单因素和多因素logistic回归分析来评估T1a RCC远处转移的危险因素,从而建立预测模型。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价模型的性能。结果:本研究纳入病理T1a的55,957例RCC患者,其中1,496例(2.67%)远处转移。转移性患者的总生存期(OS)明显低于非转移性患者(p结论:cPN和cRN之间的OS无显著差异。高龄、男性、组织学分化差、囊膜浸润、肉瘤样特征、淋巴结转移是T1a期RCC远处转移的独立危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic outcomes of surgical modalities and predictive factors for distant metastases in T1a renal cell carcinoma: a SEER database analysis.

Background: Distant metastases can still occur in T1a renal cancer. There is no conclusive evidence to determine whether cytoreductive partial nephrectomy (cPN) or cytoreductive radical nephrectomy (cRN) is superior in managing primary renal lesions. This study aimed to compare survival outcomes between cPN and cRN in pathological T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with distant metastases and to develop a predictive model for metastasis risk stratification.

Methods: T1a RCC patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Prognostic comparisons were made using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the risk factors for distant metastases in T1a RCC, leading to the development of a predictive model. The model's performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results: The study included 55,957 RCC patients with pathologic T1a, of which 1,496 (2.67%) with distant metastases. Metastatic patients exhibited significantly worse overall survival (OS) than non-metastatic counterparts (P<0.001). There was no notable difference in OS between cPN and cRN (P=0.11). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified advanced age, male gender, poor histological differentiation, sarcomatoid features, capsular invasion, and lymph node metastasis as independent risk factors for distant metastases in RCC patients with stage T1a. The predictive model established on these factors demonstrated performance with an area under the curve of 0.789.

Conclusions: There was no significant difference in OS between cPN and cRN. Advanced age, male gender, poor histological differentiation, capsular invasion, sarcomatoid features, and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for distant metastases in RCC patients with stage T1a.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信