支持职业治疗师在出院前家访决策:决策支持工具的开发和评估。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Occupational Therapy International Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/oti/2296340
Tammy Aplin, Maureen Godfrey, Liana De Michele, Amelia Hoffman, Claire Palmer, Christine McCormack, Courtney Halin, Michelle King, Jacqueline Nix, Amy Eldridge, Sally Eames
{"title":"支持职业治疗师在出院前家访决策:决策支持工具的开发和评估。","authors":"Tammy Aplin, Maureen Godfrey, Liana De Michele, Amelia Hoffman, Claire Palmer, Christine McCormack, Courtney Halin, Michelle King, Jacqueline Nix, Amy Eldridge, Sally Eames","doi":"10.1155/oti/2296340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> With little evidence to guide practice, the decision to conduct a predischarge home visit poses challenges for occupational therapists. This study is aimed at evaluating the impact of a newly developed support tool for home visit decision-making on therapists' confidence, ease, and accuracy in decision-making and stakeholders' satisfaction in the communication of the decision and examining its clinical utility and reliability. <b>Method:</b> The predischarge home visit decision-making support tool was trialed by occupational therapists from five facilities across an Australian metropolitan health service. Using a pre-post study design, therapists completed a purposefully developed questionnaire on decision-making practice including ease and confidence in decision-making. Accuracy of decision-making was also evaluated using case studies. Clinical utility and reliability data was also gathered. <b>Results:</b> While therapists' confidence and ease in decision-making did not change with use of the tool, accuracy in decision-making improved regardless of therapist's experience in home visiting. The interrater reliability of the tool was moderate, with a Fleiss' kappa value of 0.51. Good internal consistency was demonstrated with the removal of one item (<i>α</i> = 0.83). Clinical utility was supported with therapists rating the tool as timely and easy to use. <b>Conclusion:</b> The developed tool offers therapists a reliable tool to support clinical practice, by providing guidance in clinically reasoning the decision to conduct a home visit.</p>","PeriodicalId":49140,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Therapy International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2296340"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11985242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting Occupational Therapists in Predischarge Home Visit Decision-Making: Development and Evaluation of a Decision-Making Support Tool.\",\"authors\":\"Tammy Aplin, Maureen Godfrey, Liana De Michele, Amelia Hoffman, Claire Palmer, Christine McCormack, Courtney Halin, Michelle King, Jacqueline Nix, Amy Eldridge, Sally Eames\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/oti/2296340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> With little evidence to guide practice, the decision to conduct a predischarge home visit poses challenges for occupational therapists. This study is aimed at evaluating the impact of a newly developed support tool for home visit decision-making on therapists' confidence, ease, and accuracy in decision-making and stakeholders' satisfaction in the communication of the decision and examining its clinical utility and reliability. <b>Method:</b> The predischarge home visit decision-making support tool was trialed by occupational therapists from five facilities across an Australian metropolitan health service. Using a pre-post study design, therapists completed a purposefully developed questionnaire on decision-making practice including ease and confidence in decision-making. Accuracy of decision-making was also evaluated using case studies. Clinical utility and reliability data was also gathered. <b>Results:</b> While therapists' confidence and ease in decision-making did not change with use of the tool, accuracy in decision-making improved regardless of therapist's experience in home visiting. The interrater reliability of the tool was moderate, with a Fleiss' kappa value of 0.51. Good internal consistency was demonstrated with the removal of one item (<i>α</i> = 0.83). Clinical utility was supported with therapists rating the tool as timely and easy to use. <b>Conclusion:</b> The developed tool offers therapists a reliable tool to support clinical practice, by providing guidance in clinically reasoning the decision to conduct a home visit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational Therapy International\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"2296340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11985242/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational Therapy International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/oti/2296340\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Therapy International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/oti/2296340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:由于很少有证据来指导实践,决定进行出院前家访对职业治疗师提出了挑战。本研究旨在评估一种新开发的家访决策支持工具对治疗师决策的信心、轻松和准确性以及决策沟通中的利益相关者满意度的影响,并检验其临床实用性和可靠性。方法:出院前家访决策支持工具由澳大利亚大都市卫生服务机构的五个机构的职业治疗师进行试验。采用前后研究设计,治疗师完成了一份有目的的决策实践问卷,包括决策的轻松和信心。决策的准确性也通过案例研究进行了评估。还收集了临床效用和可靠性数据。结果:虽然治疗师在决策时的信心和轻松程度没有随着工具的使用而改变,但无论治疗师在家访中的经验如何,决策的准确性都有所提高。该工具的互译信度适中,Fleiss kappa值为0.51。去除一项后,结果具有良好的内部一致性(α = 0.83)。临床效用得到了治疗师的支持,他们认为该工具及时且易于使用。结论:开发的工具为治疗师提供了一个可靠的工具来支持临床实践,为临床推理进行家访的决定提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supporting Occupational Therapists in Predischarge Home Visit Decision-Making: Development and Evaluation of a Decision-Making Support Tool.

Introduction: With little evidence to guide practice, the decision to conduct a predischarge home visit poses challenges for occupational therapists. This study is aimed at evaluating the impact of a newly developed support tool for home visit decision-making on therapists' confidence, ease, and accuracy in decision-making and stakeholders' satisfaction in the communication of the decision and examining its clinical utility and reliability. Method: The predischarge home visit decision-making support tool was trialed by occupational therapists from five facilities across an Australian metropolitan health service. Using a pre-post study design, therapists completed a purposefully developed questionnaire on decision-making practice including ease and confidence in decision-making. Accuracy of decision-making was also evaluated using case studies. Clinical utility and reliability data was also gathered. Results: While therapists' confidence and ease in decision-making did not change with use of the tool, accuracy in decision-making improved regardless of therapist's experience in home visiting. The interrater reliability of the tool was moderate, with a Fleiss' kappa value of 0.51. Good internal consistency was demonstrated with the removal of one item (α = 0.83). Clinical utility was supported with therapists rating the tool as timely and easy to use. Conclusion: The developed tool offers therapists a reliable tool to support clinical practice, by providing guidance in clinically reasoning the decision to conduct a home visit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Occupational Therapy International is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing manuscripts that reflect the practice of occupational therapy throughout the world. Research studies or original concept papers are considered for publication. Priority for publication will be given to research studies that provide recommendations for evidence-based practice and demonstrate the effectiveness of a specific treatment method. Single subject case studies evaluating treatment effectiveness are also encouraged. Other topics that are appropriate for the journal include reliability and validity of clinical instruments, assistive technology, community rehabilitation, cultural comparisons, health promotion and wellness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信