Caterina Accardo , Ivan Vella , Sergio Li Petri , Duilio Pagano , Fabrizio di Francesco , Alessandra Mularoni , Marco Barbàra , Marco Canzonieri , Paolo Grossi , Salvatore Gruttadauria
{"title":"死亡供肝移植中供体来源的细菌感染:边缘移植时代风险的重新评估。","authors":"Caterina Accardo , Ivan Vella , Sergio Li Petri , Duilio Pagano , Fabrizio di Francesco , Alessandra Mularoni , Marco Barbàra , Marco Canzonieri , Paolo Grossi , Salvatore Gruttadauria","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The shortage of available organs for liver transplant has, over time, led to the inclusion of donors at risk of transmitting bacterial infections. In Italy, depending on the severity of this risk, these organs are only allocated to patients in serious clinical conditions, consequently, their use in a shortage context is further restricted.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of 194 liver transplants from deceased adult donors performed at our institute between 2019 and 2021 and performed a statistical comparison between 2 groups: recipients of livers with a risk of transmission of bacterial infection (BR group) vs recipients of livers with no risk (noBR group). Primary endpoints include 90-day and 1-year survival rates of recipients, and secondary endpoints focus on the incidence of complications of grade ≥3 according to Clavien–Dindo and donor-related infections.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety-day and 1-year mortality in the BR vs noBR group was 5% vs 7% and 5% vs 14%, respectively. Major complications at 90 days occurred in 37% of the BR group vs 47% in the noBR group. No statistical differences were observed in the 2 recipient groups with respect to clinical outcomes. Cases of donor-derived infections also occurred in the noBR group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Organs at risk of transmitting bacterial infections have comparable outcomes to other organs when appropriate risk reduction strategies are implemented. It is necessary to remove restrictions on these organs, which are becoming increasingly common in our shortage context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"57 5","pages":"Pages 823-832"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Donor-Derived Bacterial Infections in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: Reassessment of Risk in the Era of Marginal Grafts\",\"authors\":\"Caterina Accardo , Ivan Vella , Sergio Li Petri , Duilio Pagano , Fabrizio di Francesco , Alessandra Mularoni , Marco Barbàra , Marco Canzonieri , Paolo Grossi , Salvatore Gruttadauria\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.03.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The shortage of available organs for liver transplant has, over time, led to the inclusion of donors at risk of transmitting bacterial infections. In Italy, depending on the severity of this risk, these organs are only allocated to patients in serious clinical conditions, consequently, their use in a shortage context is further restricted.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of 194 liver transplants from deceased adult donors performed at our institute between 2019 and 2021 and performed a statistical comparison between 2 groups: recipients of livers with a risk of transmission of bacterial infection (BR group) vs recipients of livers with no risk (noBR group). Primary endpoints include 90-day and 1-year survival rates of recipients, and secondary endpoints focus on the incidence of complications of grade ≥3 according to Clavien–Dindo and donor-related infections.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety-day and 1-year mortality in the BR vs noBR group was 5% vs 7% and 5% vs 14%, respectively. Major complications at 90 days occurred in 37% of the BR group vs 47% in the noBR group. No statistical differences were observed in the 2 recipient groups with respect to clinical outcomes. Cases of donor-derived infections also occurred in the noBR group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Organs at risk of transmitting bacterial infections have comparable outcomes to other organs when appropriate risk reduction strategies are implemented. It is necessary to remove restrictions on these organs, which are becoming increasingly common in our shortage context.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\"57 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 823-832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134525002180\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134525002180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Donor-Derived Bacterial Infections in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: Reassessment of Risk in the Era of Marginal Grafts
Background
The shortage of available organs for liver transplant has, over time, led to the inclusion of donors at risk of transmitting bacterial infections. In Italy, depending on the severity of this risk, these organs are only allocated to patients in serious clinical conditions, consequently, their use in a shortage context is further restricted.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of 194 liver transplants from deceased adult donors performed at our institute between 2019 and 2021 and performed a statistical comparison between 2 groups: recipients of livers with a risk of transmission of bacterial infection (BR group) vs recipients of livers with no risk (noBR group). Primary endpoints include 90-day and 1-year survival rates of recipients, and secondary endpoints focus on the incidence of complications of grade ≥3 according to Clavien–Dindo and donor-related infections.
Results
Ninety-day and 1-year mortality in the BR vs noBR group was 5% vs 7% and 5% vs 14%, respectively. Major complications at 90 days occurred in 37% of the BR group vs 47% in the noBR group. No statistical differences were observed in the 2 recipient groups with respect to clinical outcomes. Cases of donor-derived infections also occurred in the noBR group.
Conclusions
Organs at risk of transmitting bacterial infections have comparable outcomes to other organs when appropriate risk reduction strategies are implemented. It is necessary to remove restrictions on these organs, which are becoming increasingly common in our shortage context.
期刊介绍:
Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication.
The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics.
Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board.
Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.