死亡供肝移植中供体来源的细菌感染:边缘移植时代风险的重新评估。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Caterina Accardo , Ivan Vella , Sergio Li Petri , Duilio Pagano , Fabrizio di Francesco , Alessandra Mularoni , Marco Barbàra , Marco Canzonieri , Paolo Grossi , Salvatore Gruttadauria
{"title":"死亡供肝移植中供体来源的细菌感染:边缘移植时代风险的重新评估。","authors":"Caterina Accardo ,&nbsp;Ivan Vella ,&nbsp;Sergio Li Petri ,&nbsp;Duilio Pagano ,&nbsp;Fabrizio di Francesco ,&nbsp;Alessandra Mularoni ,&nbsp;Marco Barbàra ,&nbsp;Marco Canzonieri ,&nbsp;Paolo Grossi ,&nbsp;Salvatore Gruttadauria","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The shortage of available organs for liver transplant has, over time, led to the inclusion of donors at risk of transmitting bacterial infections. In Italy, depending on the severity of this risk, these organs are only allocated to patients in serious clinical conditions, consequently, their use in a shortage context is further restricted.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of 194 liver transplants from deceased adult donors performed at our institute between 2019 and 2021 and performed a statistical comparison between 2 groups: recipients of livers with a risk of transmission of bacterial infection (BR group) vs recipients of livers with no risk (noBR group). Primary endpoints include 90-day and 1-year survival rates of recipients, and secondary endpoints focus on the incidence of complications of grade ≥3 according to Clavien–Dindo and donor-related infections.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety-day and 1-year mortality in the BR vs noBR group was 5% vs 7% and 5% vs 14%, respectively. Major complications at 90 days occurred in 37% of the BR group vs 47% in the noBR group. No statistical differences were observed in the 2 recipient groups with respect to clinical outcomes. Cases of donor-derived infections also occurred in the noBR group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Organs at risk of transmitting bacterial infections have comparable outcomes to other organs when appropriate risk reduction strategies are implemented. It is necessary to remove restrictions on these organs, which are becoming increasingly common in our shortage context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"57 5","pages":"Pages 823-832"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Donor-Derived Bacterial Infections in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: Reassessment of Risk in the Era of Marginal Grafts\",\"authors\":\"Caterina Accardo ,&nbsp;Ivan Vella ,&nbsp;Sergio Li Petri ,&nbsp;Duilio Pagano ,&nbsp;Fabrizio di Francesco ,&nbsp;Alessandra Mularoni ,&nbsp;Marco Barbàra ,&nbsp;Marco Canzonieri ,&nbsp;Paolo Grossi ,&nbsp;Salvatore Gruttadauria\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.03.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The shortage of available organs for liver transplant has, over time, led to the inclusion of donors at risk of transmitting bacterial infections. In Italy, depending on the severity of this risk, these organs are only allocated to patients in serious clinical conditions, consequently, their use in a shortage context is further restricted.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of 194 liver transplants from deceased adult donors performed at our institute between 2019 and 2021 and performed a statistical comparison between 2 groups: recipients of livers with a risk of transmission of bacterial infection (BR group) vs recipients of livers with no risk (noBR group). Primary endpoints include 90-day and 1-year survival rates of recipients, and secondary endpoints focus on the incidence of complications of grade ≥3 according to Clavien–Dindo and donor-related infections.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety-day and 1-year mortality in the BR vs noBR group was 5% vs 7% and 5% vs 14%, respectively. Major complications at 90 days occurred in 37% of the BR group vs 47% in the noBR group. No statistical differences were observed in the 2 recipient groups with respect to clinical outcomes. Cases of donor-derived infections also occurred in the noBR group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Organs at risk of transmitting bacterial infections have comparable outcomes to other organs when appropriate risk reduction strategies are implemented. It is necessary to remove restrictions on these organs, which are becoming increasingly common in our shortage context.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\"57 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 823-832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134525002180\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134525002180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着时间的推移,可用肝移植器官的短缺导致了有传播细菌感染风险的供体。在意大利,根据这种风险的严重程度,这些器官只分配给有严重临床情况的患者,因此,在短缺的情况下,它们的使用进一步受到限制。方法:回顾性分析2019年至2021年在我院连续进行的194例已故成人供体肝移植手术,并对两组患者进行统计比较:有细菌感染传播风险的肝脏受体(BR组)和无风险的肝脏受体(noBR组)。主要终点包括受者的90天和1年生存率,次要终点关注Clavien-Dindo分级≥3级并发症和供者相关感染的发生率。结果:BR组与noBR组的90天和1年死亡率分别为5%对7%和5%对14%。BR组在90天发生主要并发症的比例为37%,而非BR组为47%。两组患者的临床结果无统计学差异。noBR组也发生供体源性感染病例。结论:当实施适当的风险降低策略时,有传播细菌感染风险的器官与其他器官的结果相当。有必要取消对这些器官的限制,在我们器官短缺的背景下,这些器官正变得越来越普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Donor-Derived Bacterial Infections in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: Reassessment of Risk in the Era of Marginal Grafts

Background

The shortage of available organs for liver transplant has, over time, led to the inclusion of donors at risk of transmitting bacterial infections. In Italy, depending on the severity of this risk, these organs are only allocated to patients in serious clinical conditions, consequently, their use in a shortage context is further restricted.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of 194 liver transplants from deceased adult donors performed at our institute between 2019 and 2021 and performed a statistical comparison between 2 groups: recipients of livers with a risk of transmission of bacterial infection (BR group) vs recipients of livers with no risk (noBR group). Primary endpoints include 90-day and 1-year survival rates of recipients, and secondary endpoints focus on the incidence of complications of grade ≥3 according to Clavien–Dindo and donor-related infections.

Results

Ninety-day and 1-year mortality in the BR vs noBR group was 5% vs 7% and 5% vs 14%, respectively. Major complications at 90 days occurred in 37% of the BR group vs 47% in the noBR group. No statistical differences were observed in the 2 recipient groups with respect to clinical outcomes. Cases of donor-derived infections also occurred in the noBR group.

Conclusions

Organs at risk of transmitting bacterial infections have comparable outcomes to other organs when appropriate risk reduction strategies are implemented. It is necessary to remove restrictions on these organs, which are becoming increasingly common in our shortage context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation proceedings
Transplantation proceedings 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics. Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board. Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信