{"title":"促进耳鼻喉科住院医师项目的多样性:访问医学生选修课程的医学资助不足。","authors":"Audrey M Abend, Shaila T Man, Li-Xing Man","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to report the prevalence and characteristics of underrepresented in medicine (URiM) funding for visiting medical student clerkships in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) residency programs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Manual online review of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited OHNS residency programs as of January 2024, reflective of typical medical student search methodology.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An online review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For each program, at least 2 authors captured presence of funding, the funding amount, funding origin, and eligibility criteria. Presence and amount funding were analyzed for possible associations with program type (by FREIDA™ program description), urbanization level, cost of living, and degree of racial and ethnic diversity in the program's geographic location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 131 programs, 49 (37.4%) offered URiM funding, primarily through diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) entities (67.3%) or OHNS departments (32.7%). Mean funding per 1-month rotation was $1908. Eligibility criteria varied, with 63.2% using a non-specific URiM definition and 18.4% following the Association of American Medical Colleges definition. Funding presence did not differ by geographic region (<i>P</i> = .06), program type, urbanization level, or cost of living. However, funding amounts varied significantly by region (<i>P</i> < .01) and were significantly different between programs in diversity index 35.0% to 44.9% versus 45.0% to 54.9% and 55.0% to 64.9% (<i>P</i> = .007 and <i>P</i> = .002, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>URiM funding is available in a minority of OHNS programs, with substantial variability in funding amount and eligibility criteria. Standardized guidance on defining URiM eligibility may benefit students and institutions. Funding may correlate with local racial and ethnic diversity, warranting further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 2","pages":"e70109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting Diversity in Otolaryngology Residency Programs: Underrepresented in Medicine Funding for Visiting Medical Student Electives.\",\"authors\":\"Audrey M Abend, Shaila T Man, Li-Xing Man\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/oto2.70109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to report the prevalence and characteristics of underrepresented in medicine (URiM) funding for visiting medical student clerkships in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) residency programs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Manual online review of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited OHNS residency programs as of January 2024, reflective of typical medical student search methodology.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An online review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For each program, at least 2 authors captured presence of funding, the funding amount, funding origin, and eligibility criteria. Presence and amount funding were analyzed for possible associations with program type (by FREIDA™ program description), urbanization level, cost of living, and degree of racial and ethnic diversity in the program's geographic location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 131 programs, 49 (37.4%) offered URiM funding, primarily through diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) entities (67.3%) or OHNS departments (32.7%). Mean funding per 1-month rotation was $1908. Eligibility criteria varied, with 63.2% using a non-specific URiM definition and 18.4% following the Association of American Medical Colleges definition. Funding presence did not differ by geographic region (<i>P</i> = .06), program type, urbanization level, or cost of living. However, funding amounts varied significantly by region (<i>P</i> < .01) and were significantly different between programs in diversity index 35.0% to 44.9% versus 45.0% to 54.9% and 55.0% to 64.9% (<i>P</i> = .007 and <i>P</i> = .002, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>URiM funding is available in a minority of OHNS programs, with substantial variability in funding amount and eligibility criteria. Standardized guidance on defining URiM eligibility may benefit students and institutions. Funding may correlate with local racial and ethnic diversity, warranting further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OTO Open\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"e70109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995422/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OTO Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在报告美国耳鼻喉头颈外科(OHNS)住院医师项目访问医学生见习经费不足(URiM)的发生率和特点。研究设计:截至2024年1月,对研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)认可的OHNS住院医师计划进行手动在线审查,反映了典型的医学生搜索方法。设置:在线评论。方法:对于每个项目,至少有2位作者记录了资助的存在、资助金额、资助来源和资格标准。分析了项目的存在和资助金额与项目类型(通过FREIDA™项目描述)、城市化水平、生活成本以及项目所在地理位置的种族和民族多样性程度的可能关联。结果:131个项目中,49个(37.4%)提供了URiM资助,主要是通过多元化、公平和包容(DEI)实体(67.3%)或OHNS部门(32.7%)。每1个月轮换的平均经费为$1908。资格标准各不相同,63.2%使用非特定的URiM定义,18.4%遵循美国医学院协会的定义。资金的存在没有因地理区域(P = .06)、项目类型、城市化水平或生活成本而异。然而,不同地区的资助金额差异很大(P =。007, P =。002年,分别)。结论:少数OHNS项目可获得URiM资助,但在资助金额和资格标准方面存在很大差异。界定大学入学资格的标准化指导可使学生和院校受益。资金可能与当地种族和民族的多样性有关,因此需要进一步的研究。
Promoting Diversity in Otolaryngology Residency Programs: Underrepresented in Medicine Funding for Visiting Medical Student Electives.
Objective: This study aims to report the prevalence and characteristics of underrepresented in medicine (URiM) funding for visiting medical student clerkships in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) residency programs in the United States.
Study design: Manual online review of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited OHNS residency programs as of January 2024, reflective of typical medical student search methodology.
Setting: An online review.
Methods: For each program, at least 2 authors captured presence of funding, the funding amount, funding origin, and eligibility criteria. Presence and amount funding were analyzed for possible associations with program type (by FREIDA™ program description), urbanization level, cost of living, and degree of racial and ethnic diversity in the program's geographic location.
Results: Of 131 programs, 49 (37.4%) offered URiM funding, primarily through diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) entities (67.3%) or OHNS departments (32.7%). Mean funding per 1-month rotation was $1908. Eligibility criteria varied, with 63.2% using a non-specific URiM definition and 18.4% following the Association of American Medical Colleges definition. Funding presence did not differ by geographic region (P = .06), program type, urbanization level, or cost of living. However, funding amounts varied significantly by region (P < .01) and were significantly different between programs in diversity index 35.0% to 44.9% versus 45.0% to 54.9% and 55.0% to 64.9% (P = .007 and P = .002, respectively).
Conclusion: URiM funding is available in a minority of OHNS programs, with substantial variability in funding amount and eligibility criteria. Standardized guidance on defining URiM eligibility may benefit students and institutions. Funding may correlate with local racial and ethnic diversity, warranting further research.