Hassaan Ul Hassan, Tanzeel-Ur-Rahman Al Gazder, Nawaz Khan, Abbas Jafri, Asad Shahzad Hassan, Altaf Hashmi
{"title":"西洛多辛与坦索罗辛治疗前列腺增生患者急性尿潴留的疗效比较。","authors":"Hassaan Ul Hassan, Tanzeel-Ur-Rahman Al Gazder, Nawaz Khan, Abbas Jafri, Asad Shahzad Hassan, Altaf Hashmi","doi":"10.47391/JPMA.20668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of silodosin and tamsulosin in patients with acute urine retention caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective cohort study was conducted at the Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, from July to December 2022, and comprised male benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with acute urine retention. The patients were divided into group A receiving 0.4mg tamsulosin and group B receiving 8mg silodosin. The catheter was withdrawn after seven days. Trial without catheterisation success was measured by patients' postvoid residue. All patients were reassessed for post-void residue at 4 weeks after a successful trial without catheterisation. Data was analysed using SPSS 21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 130 male subjects with mean age 64.79±9.71 years, mean prostate volume 46.22±6.82ml and mean post-void residual 96±13ml on day 7 and 89.73±14.38ml on day 28, 65(50%) were in each of the two groups. Intergroup difference with respect to efficacy at four weeks was not significant (p=0.584).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The efficacy of tamsulosin and silodosin in individuals with benign prostatic hyperplasia was comparable.</p>","PeriodicalId":54369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association","volume":"75 4","pages":"592-595"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of silodosin vs. tamsulosin in treating acute urinary retention in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients.\",\"authors\":\"Hassaan Ul Hassan, Tanzeel-Ur-Rahman Al Gazder, Nawaz Khan, Abbas Jafri, Asad Shahzad Hassan, Altaf Hashmi\",\"doi\":\"10.47391/JPMA.20668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of silodosin and tamsulosin in patients with acute urine retention caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective cohort study was conducted at the Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, from July to December 2022, and comprised male benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with acute urine retention. The patients were divided into group A receiving 0.4mg tamsulosin and group B receiving 8mg silodosin. The catheter was withdrawn after seven days. Trial without catheterisation success was measured by patients' postvoid residue. All patients were reassessed for post-void residue at 4 weeks after a successful trial without catheterisation. Data was analysed using SPSS 21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 130 male subjects with mean age 64.79±9.71 years, mean prostate volume 46.22±6.82ml and mean post-void residual 96±13ml on day 7 and 89.73±14.38ml on day 28, 65(50%) were in each of the two groups. Intergroup difference with respect to efficacy at four weeks was not significant (p=0.584).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The efficacy of tamsulosin and silodosin in individuals with benign prostatic hyperplasia was comparable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"75 4\",\"pages\":\"592-595\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.20668\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.20668","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative effectiveness of silodosin vs. tamsulosin in treating acute urinary retention in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of silodosin and tamsulosin in patients with acute urine retention caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Methods: The prospective cohort study was conducted at the Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, from July to December 2022, and comprised male benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with acute urine retention. The patients were divided into group A receiving 0.4mg tamsulosin and group B receiving 8mg silodosin. The catheter was withdrawn after seven days. Trial without catheterisation success was measured by patients' postvoid residue. All patients were reassessed for post-void residue at 4 weeks after a successful trial without catheterisation. Data was analysed using SPSS 21.
Results: Of the 130 male subjects with mean age 64.79±9.71 years, mean prostate volume 46.22±6.82ml and mean post-void residual 96±13ml on day 7 and 89.73±14.38ml on day 28, 65(50%) were in each of the two groups. Intergroup difference with respect to efficacy at four weeks was not significant (p=0.584).
Conclusions: The efficacy of tamsulosin and silodosin in individuals with benign prostatic hyperplasia was comparable.
期刊介绍:
Primarily being a medical journal, JPMA publishes scholarly research focusing on the various fields in the areas of health and medical education. It publishes original research describing recent advances in health particularly clinical studies, clinical trials, assessments of pathogens of diagnostic importance, medical genetics and epidemiological studies. Review articles highlighting importance of various issues in the domain of public health, drug research and medical education are also accepted. As a leading journal of South Asia, JPMA remains cognizant of the recent advances in the rapidly growing fields of biomedical sciences, it invites and encourages scholars to write short reviews and invited editorials on the emerging issues. We particularly aim to promote health standards of developing countries by encouraging manuscript submissions on issues affecting the public health and health delivery services.