美国老年家庭照顾者与非照顾者的疼痛发生率和强度比较

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Shelbie G Turner, M Carrington Reid, Karl A Pillemer
{"title":"美国老年家庭照顾者与非照顾者的疼痛发生率和强度比较","authors":"Shelbie G Turner, M Carrington Reid, Karl A Pillemer","doi":"10.1177/08982643251331247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveWe compared pain prevalence and intensity between caregivers and non-caregivers, as well as between different types of caregivers.MethodUsing two rounds of data from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project, we used regression models to analyze differences in pain prevalence and intensity between caregivers and non-caregivers at baseline (2010-2011) and follow-up (2015-2016). The sample consisted of 2332 participants aged 62 and older (352 caregivers and 1980 non-caregivers).ResultsCross-sectionally, caregivers were more likely than non-caregivers to report pain. Longitudinally, caregivers with pain at baseline were more likely to report the presence of pain and greater pain intensity five years later compared to non-caregivers who also reported pain at baseline. More hours of care per week was associated with greater pain intensity at baseline and follow-up among caregivers with pain.DiscussionCaregivers' pain is a public health concern, with efforts to mitigate the effects of caregiving on pain needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Health","volume":" ","pages":"8982643251331247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Prevalence and Intensity Among Older Family Caregivers Versus Non-Caregivers in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Shelbie G Turner, M Carrington Reid, Karl A Pillemer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08982643251331247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveWe compared pain prevalence and intensity between caregivers and non-caregivers, as well as between different types of caregivers.MethodUsing two rounds of data from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project, we used regression models to analyze differences in pain prevalence and intensity between caregivers and non-caregivers at baseline (2010-2011) and follow-up (2015-2016). The sample consisted of 2332 participants aged 62 and older (352 caregivers and 1980 non-caregivers).ResultsCross-sectionally, caregivers were more likely than non-caregivers to report pain. Longitudinally, caregivers with pain at baseline were more likely to report the presence of pain and greater pain intensity five years later compared to non-caregivers who also reported pain at baseline. More hours of care per week was associated with greater pain intensity at baseline and follow-up among caregivers with pain.DiscussionCaregivers' pain is a public health concern, with efforts to mitigate the effects of caregiving on pain needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging and Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8982643251331247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643251331247\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643251331247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较护理人员与非护理人员以及不同类型护理人员之间的疼痛发生率和疼痛强度。方法利用国家社会生活、健康和老龄化项目的两轮数据,采用回归模型分析护理人员和非护理人员在基线(2010-2011年)和随访(2015-2016年)期间疼痛患病率和强度的差异。样本包括2332名年龄在62岁及以上的参与者(352名照顾者和1980名非照顾者)。结果横断面上,护理人员比非护理人员更有可能报告疼痛。纵向上,基线疼痛的护理人员与基线疼痛的非护理人员相比,五年后更有可能报告疼痛的存在和更大的疼痛强度。在基线和随访中,每周护理时间越长,疼痛强度越大。照顾者的疼痛是一个公共健康问题,需要努力减轻照顾对疼痛的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pain Prevalence and Intensity Among Older Family Caregivers Versus Non-Caregivers in the United States.

ObjectiveWe compared pain prevalence and intensity between caregivers and non-caregivers, as well as between different types of caregivers.MethodUsing two rounds of data from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project, we used regression models to analyze differences in pain prevalence and intensity between caregivers and non-caregivers at baseline (2010-2011) and follow-up (2015-2016). The sample consisted of 2332 participants aged 62 and older (352 caregivers and 1980 non-caregivers).ResultsCross-sectionally, caregivers were more likely than non-caregivers to report pain. Longitudinally, caregivers with pain at baseline were more likely to report the presence of pain and greater pain intensity five years later compared to non-caregivers who also reported pain at baseline. More hours of care per week was associated with greater pain intensity at baseline and follow-up among caregivers with pain.DiscussionCaregivers' pain is a public health concern, with efforts to mitigate the effects of caregiving on pain needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging and Health is an interdisciplinary forum for the presentation of research findings and scholarly exchange in the area of aging and health. Manuscripts are sought that deal with social and behavioral factors related to health and aging. Disciplines represented include the behavioral and social sciences, public health, epidemiology, demography, health services research, nursing, social work, medicine, and related disciplines. Although preference is given to manuscripts presenting the findings of original research, review and methodological pieces will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信