[镜子,墙上的镜子:学生对治疗技能的自我评估容易产生系统性偏差]。

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Laura-Ashley Fraunfelter, Antje B M Gerdes, Georg W Alpers
{"title":"[镜子,墙上的镜子:学生对治疗技能的自我评估容易产生系统性偏差]。","authors":"Laura-Ashley Fraunfelter, Antje B M Gerdes, Georg W Alpers","doi":"10.1055/a-2547-8479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-reflection is considered a central component in the training of clinical psychologists and requires accurate self-assessment of psychotherapeutic competencies. However, previous research suggests that self-assessment of psychotherapeutic skills is prone to biases. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of master's students to evaluate their own competencies and to identify person-specific and situational factors predicting self-assessment.The study was conducted as part of the communication skills practicum in the master's program in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy at the University of Mannheim. At the end of the practicum, students conducted an anamnesis interview with simulated patients. Subsequently, 39 master's students assessed their own psychotherapeutic competencies in the anamnesis interview using the Cognitive Therapy Scale. Additionally, a trained expert evaluated the competencies to compare self-assessments with external evaluations. Therapeutic self-efficacy was recorded before the practicum as a person-specific factor predicting self-assessment. The difficulty of the simulated interview was coded to determine situational factors.On average, the agreement between self-assessment and external evaluation of competencies was low (ICC=0.25). Overall, students underestimated their psychotherapeutic competencies, particularly when their performance was above average. However, when their performance was below average, they tended to overestimate their competencies. Especially higher therapeutic self-efficacy predicted more positive self-assessment scores. Higher self-efficacy was also associated with an overestimation of one's own competencies.The results of the study indicate that self-assessment of psychotherapeutic competencies by master's students is subject to systematic biases. Initial findings also suggest that person-specific factors are better predictors of the distortion of self-assessment than situational factors.To ensure beneficial self-reflection, master's students should be trained in the reliable assessment of their own psychotherapeutic competencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":"75 5","pages":"162-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Mirror, mirror on the wall: Students' self-assessment of therapeutic skills is prone to systematic biases].\",\"authors\":\"Laura-Ashley Fraunfelter, Antje B M Gerdes, Georg W Alpers\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2547-8479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Self-reflection is considered a central component in the training of clinical psychologists and requires accurate self-assessment of psychotherapeutic competencies. However, previous research suggests that self-assessment of psychotherapeutic skills is prone to biases. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of master's students to evaluate their own competencies and to identify person-specific and situational factors predicting self-assessment.The study was conducted as part of the communication skills practicum in the master's program in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy at the University of Mannheim. At the end of the practicum, students conducted an anamnesis interview with simulated patients. Subsequently, 39 master's students assessed their own psychotherapeutic competencies in the anamnesis interview using the Cognitive Therapy Scale. Additionally, a trained expert evaluated the competencies to compare self-assessments with external evaluations. Therapeutic self-efficacy was recorded before the practicum as a person-specific factor predicting self-assessment. The difficulty of the simulated interview was coded to determine situational factors.On average, the agreement between self-assessment and external evaluation of competencies was low (ICC=0.25). Overall, students underestimated their psychotherapeutic competencies, particularly when their performance was above average. However, when their performance was below average, they tended to overestimate their competencies. Especially higher therapeutic self-efficacy predicted more positive self-assessment scores. Higher self-efficacy was also associated with an overestimation of one's own competencies.The results of the study indicate that self-assessment of psychotherapeutic competencies by master's students is subject to systematic biases. Initial findings also suggest that person-specific factors are better predictors of the distortion of self-assessment than situational factors.To ensure beneficial self-reflection, master's students should be trained in the reliable assessment of their own psychotherapeutic competencies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"volume\":\"75 5\",\"pages\":\"162-172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2547-8479\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2547-8479","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自我反思被认为是临床心理学家培训的核心组成部分,需要对心理治疗能力进行准确的自我评估。然而,先前的研究表明,心理治疗技能的自我评估容易产生偏差。摘要本研究旨在探讨硕士生自我能力评估的能力,并找出预测自我评估的个人因素和情境因素。这项研究是作为曼海姆大学临床心理学和心理治疗硕士课程沟通技巧实习的一部分进行的。在实习结束时,学生们对模拟病人进行了一次记忆访谈。随后,39名硕士生在记忆访谈中使用认知治疗量表评估自己的心理治疗能力。此外,训练有素的专家评估能力,以比较自我评估与外部评估。治疗性自我效能在实习前被记录下来,作为预测自我评估的个人特定因素。模拟面试的难度被编码以确定情境因素。平均而言,自我评估与外部能力评估的一致性较低(ICC=0.25)。总的来说,学生们低估了他们的心理治疗能力,特别是当他们的表现高于平均水平时。然而,当他们的表现低于平均水平时,他们倾向于高估自己的能力。尤其是更高的治疗性自我效能预示着更高的积极自我评价分数。较高的自我效能感也与高估自己的能力有关。研究结果表明,硕士生对心理治疗能力的自我评价存在系统性偏差。初步研究结果还表明,个人因素比情境因素更能预测自我评估的扭曲。为了确保有益的自我反思,硕士生应该接受可靠评估自己心理治疗能力的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Mirror, mirror on the wall: Students' self-assessment of therapeutic skills is prone to systematic biases].

Self-reflection is considered a central component in the training of clinical psychologists and requires accurate self-assessment of psychotherapeutic competencies. However, previous research suggests that self-assessment of psychotherapeutic skills is prone to biases. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of master's students to evaluate their own competencies and to identify person-specific and situational factors predicting self-assessment.The study was conducted as part of the communication skills practicum in the master's program in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy at the University of Mannheim. At the end of the practicum, students conducted an anamnesis interview with simulated patients. Subsequently, 39 master's students assessed their own psychotherapeutic competencies in the anamnesis interview using the Cognitive Therapy Scale. Additionally, a trained expert evaluated the competencies to compare self-assessments with external evaluations. Therapeutic self-efficacy was recorded before the practicum as a person-specific factor predicting self-assessment. The difficulty of the simulated interview was coded to determine situational factors.On average, the agreement between self-assessment and external evaluation of competencies was low (ICC=0.25). Overall, students underestimated their psychotherapeutic competencies, particularly when their performance was above average. However, when their performance was below average, they tended to overestimate their competencies. Especially higher therapeutic self-efficacy predicted more positive self-assessment scores. Higher self-efficacy was also associated with an overestimation of one's own competencies.The results of the study indicate that self-assessment of psychotherapeutic competencies by master's students is subject to systematic biases. Initial findings also suggest that person-specific factors are better predictors of the distortion of self-assessment than situational factors.To ensure beneficial self-reflection, master's students should be trained in the reliable assessment of their own psychotherapeutic competencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信