Eva Flemming, Laura Lübke, Carsten Spitzer, Sascha Müller
{"title":"用自我报告评估无组织依恋:无组织反应量表(DRS)的心理测量学评价。","authors":"Eva Flemming, Laura Lübke, Carsten Spitzer, Sascha Müller","doi":"10.1037/tra0001904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the context of the Adult Attachment Interview, an \"unresolved/disorganized\" attachment status is characterized by lapses in reasoning or discourse when discussing traumatic experiences. A comprehensive body of research indicates that an unresolved/disorganized adult attachment status plays a crucial role in understanding complex mental health problems. The Disorganized Response Scale (DRS) is a novel self-report measure that mirrors the general focus of the Adult Attachment Interview in assessing disorganized verbalizations and cognitions related to attachment experiences. The scale has exhibited promising psychometric properties in a student sample, but evaluations in more diverse populations and in clinical samples are not yet available.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A German translation of the DRS was assessed in a general population sample (<i>N</i> = 1,101) and in a clinical sample of outpatients (<i>N</i> = 176). The psychometric properties and validity of the scale with respect to its associations with other self-report measures of attachment and psychopathology were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unidimensionality of the scale was overall confirmed with limitations in the clinical sample. The scale exhibited high internal consistency in both samples. There was evidence for incremental validity of the DRS over and above the standard self-report measures of organized attachment, that is, attachment anxiety and avoidance in predicting psychopathology (particularly dissociation).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DRS allows for measuring disorganized responses related to early attachment experiences through self-report. Although findings overall suggest that the German version of the DRS is a valid measure of disorganized responses, some aspects such as its dimensionality warrant critical discussion. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing disorganized attachment by self-report: Psychometric evaluation of the Disorganized Response Scale (DRS).\",\"authors\":\"Eva Flemming, Laura Lübke, Carsten Spitzer, Sascha Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tra0001904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the context of the Adult Attachment Interview, an \\\"unresolved/disorganized\\\" attachment status is characterized by lapses in reasoning or discourse when discussing traumatic experiences. A comprehensive body of research indicates that an unresolved/disorganized adult attachment status plays a crucial role in understanding complex mental health problems. The Disorganized Response Scale (DRS) is a novel self-report measure that mirrors the general focus of the Adult Attachment Interview in assessing disorganized verbalizations and cognitions related to attachment experiences. The scale has exhibited promising psychometric properties in a student sample, but evaluations in more diverse populations and in clinical samples are not yet available.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A German translation of the DRS was assessed in a general population sample (<i>N</i> = 1,101) and in a clinical sample of outpatients (<i>N</i> = 176). The psychometric properties and validity of the scale with respect to its associations with other self-report measures of attachment and psychopathology were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unidimensionality of the scale was overall confirmed with limitations in the clinical sample. The scale exhibited high internal consistency in both samples. There was evidence for incremental validity of the DRS over and above the standard self-report measures of organized attachment, that is, attachment anxiety and avoidance in predicting psychopathology (particularly dissociation).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DRS allows for measuring disorganized responses related to early attachment experiences through self-report. Although findings overall suggest that the German version of the DRS is a valid measure of disorganized responses, some aspects such as its dimensionality warrant critical discussion. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001904\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001904","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在成人依恋访谈的背景下,“未解决/无序”依恋状态的特征是在讨论创伤经历时推理或话语的失误。一项全面的研究表明,未解决/无组织的成人依恋状态在理解复杂的心理健康问题中起着至关重要的作用。无序反应量表(DRS)是一种新的自我报告量表,反映了成人依恋访谈在评估与依恋体验相关的无序言语和认知方面的总体重点。该量表在学生样本中显示出有希望的心理测量特性,但在更多样化的人群和临床样本中尚未得到评估。方法:在一般人群样本(N = 1101)和门诊患者临床样本(N = 176)中评估DRS的德语翻译。该量表的心理测量特性和效度与其他依恋和精神病理自我报告测量的关联进行了检验。结果:量表的单维性总体上得到了证实,但在临床样本中存在局限性。该量表在两种样品中均表现出较高的内部一致性。有证据表明,DRS在预测精神病理(特别是分离)方面的有效性高于有组织依恋的标准自我报告测量,即依恋焦虑和回避。结论:DRS允许通过自我报告来测量与早期依恋经历相关的无组织反应。虽然研究结果总体上表明,德国版的DRS是一种有效的衡量无组织反应的方法,但一些方面,如其维度,值得关键的讨论。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Assessing disorganized attachment by self-report: Psychometric evaluation of the Disorganized Response Scale (DRS).
Objective: In the context of the Adult Attachment Interview, an "unresolved/disorganized" attachment status is characterized by lapses in reasoning or discourse when discussing traumatic experiences. A comprehensive body of research indicates that an unresolved/disorganized adult attachment status plays a crucial role in understanding complex mental health problems. The Disorganized Response Scale (DRS) is a novel self-report measure that mirrors the general focus of the Adult Attachment Interview in assessing disorganized verbalizations and cognitions related to attachment experiences. The scale has exhibited promising psychometric properties in a student sample, but evaluations in more diverse populations and in clinical samples are not yet available.
Method: A German translation of the DRS was assessed in a general population sample (N = 1,101) and in a clinical sample of outpatients (N = 176). The psychometric properties and validity of the scale with respect to its associations with other self-report measures of attachment and psychopathology were examined.
Results: Unidimensionality of the scale was overall confirmed with limitations in the clinical sample. The scale exhibited high internal consistency in both samples. There was evidence for incremental validity of the DRS over and above the standard self-report measures of organized attachment, that is, attachment anxiety and avoidance in predicting psychopathology (particularly dissociation).
Conclusions: The DRS allows for measuring disorganized responses related to early attachment experiences through self-report. Although findings overall suggest that the German version of the DRS is a valid measure of disorganized responses, some aspects such as its dimensionality warrant critical discussion. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy.
The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including:
-Psychological treatments and effects
-Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma
-Assessment and diagnosis of trauma
-Pathophysiology of trauma reactions
-Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations)
-Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies
-Neuroimaging studies
-Trauma and cultural competence