协调刺激-反应空间相容性效应的神经生理学和认知理论:一种视觉-运动分离方法。

Q2 Medicine
Elton H Matsushima, Jose Antonio Aznar-Casanova
{"title":"协调刺激-反应空间相容性效应的神经生理学和认知理论:一种视觉-运动分离方法。","authors":"Elton H Matsushima, Jose Antonio Aznar-Casanova","doi":"10.3390/vision9020034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the differential impact of two visual dimensions (direction and spatial location) in two spatial Stroop tasks, where the relevant dimension for the response varied. Three studies compared the interactions between spatial compatibility and congruence effects on reaction time performances to infer how the dorsal pathway (DP) and ventral pathway (VP) of visual processing interfered with one another in processing relevant and irrelevant spatial information. This allowed us to bridge neurophysiological mechanisms with dual-process models of spatial compatibility. The participants responded from an avatar's perspective, manipulated through rotations relative to the forward position, along with independent rotations of the avatar's screen and keyboard. The results revealed two distinct response patterns: in the Direction Stroop, the performance was influenced equally by the relevant direction (VP) and the automatic processing of irrelevant location (DP); in the Location Stroop, the VP exerted minimal interference on the DP. Furthermore, the Only Keyboard rotation disrupted hand-eye coordination, modulating the DP interference on the VP in the Direction Stroop. These findings provide insights into the functional interaction of these visual pathways and their contributions to spatial compatibility effects, along with evidence for the dual-process model of spatial compatibility. Some issues about the separation of visual pathways are discussed based on our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconciling the Neurophysiological and Cognitive Theories of Stimulus-Response Spatial Compatibility Effects: A Visual-Motor Dissociation Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Elton H Matsushima, Jose Antonio Aznar-Casanova\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/vision9020034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated the differential impact of two visual dimensions (direction and spatial location) in two spatial Stroop tasks, where the relevant dimension for the response varied. Three studies compared the interactions between spatial compatibility and congruence effects on reaction time performances to infer how the dorsal pathway (DP) and ventral pathway (VP) of visual processing interfered with one another in processing relevant and irrelevant spatial information. This allowed us to bridge neurophysiological mechanisms with dual-process models of spatial compatibility. The participants responded from an avatar's perspective, manipulated through rotations relative to the forward position, along with independent rotations of the avatar's screen and keyboard. The results revealed two distinct response patterns: in the Direction Stroop, the performance was influenced equally by the relevant direction (VP) and the automatic processing of irrelevant location (DP); in the Location Stroop, the VP exerted minimal interference on the DP. Furthermore, the Only Keyboard rotation disrupted hand-eye coordination, modulating the DP interference on the VP in the Direction Stroop. These findings provide insights into the functional interaction of these visual pathways and their contributions to spatial compatibility effects, along with evidence for the dual-process model of spatial compatibility. Some issues about the separation of visual pathways are discussed based on our results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision (Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015925/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision (Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9020034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision (Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9020034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了两个视觉维度(方向和空间位置)在两个空间Stroop任务中的差异影响,其中相关维度的反应不同。三个研究比较了空间相容性和空间一致性对反应时间表现的相互作用,以推断视觉加工的背侧通路(DP)和腹侧通路(VP)如何在加工相关和不相关的空间信息时相互干扰。这使我们能够将神经生理机制与空间相容性的双过程模型联系起来。参与者从角色的角度做出反应,通过相对于前进位置的旋转来操纵,以及角色的屏幕和键盘的独立旋转。结果表明:在方向Stroop中,相关方向(VP)和不相关位置(DP)的自动加工对受试者的表现有同等的影响;在位置Stroop中,副总统对DP的干扰最小。此外,唯一键盘旋转干扰了手眼协调,调节了方向方向上DP对VP的干扰。这些发现为这些视觉通路的功能相互作用及其对空间相容性效应的贡献提供了见解,并为空间相容性的双过程模型提供了证据。在此基础上讨论了视觉通路分离的相关问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconciling the Neurophysiological and Cognitive Theories of Stimulus-Response Spatial Compatibility Effects: A Visual-Motor Dissociation Approach.

This study investigated the differential impact of two visual dimensions (direction and spatial location) in two spatial Stroop tasks, where the relevant dimension for the response varied. Three studies compared the interactions between spatial compatibility and congruence effects on reaction time performances to infer how the dorsal pathway (DP) and ventral pathway (VP) of visual processing interfered with one another in processing relevant and irrelevant spatial information. This allowed us to bridge neurophysiological mechanisms with dual-process models of spatial compatibility. The participants responded from an avatar's perspective, manipulated through rotations relative to the forward position, along with independent rotations of the avatar's screen and keyboard. The results revealed two distinct response patterns: in the Direction Stroop, the performance was influenced equally by the relevant direction (VP) and the automatic processing of irrelevant location (DP); in the Location Stroop, the VP exerted minimal interference on the DP. Furthermore, the Only Keyboard rotation disrupted hand-eye coordination, modulating the DP interference on the VP in the Direction Stroop. These findings provide insights into the functional interaction of these visual pathways and their contributions to spatial compatibility effects, along with evidence for the dual-process model of spatial compatibility. Some issues about the separation of visual pathways are discussed based on our results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vision (Switzerland)
Vision (Switzerland) Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信