采用GWAS汇总统计方法对两个性状之间的双样本双向因果关系进行了分析,并在两个方向上都有一些无效的IVs。

IF 3.3 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Siyi Chen
{"title":"采用GWAS汇总统计方法对两个性状之间的双样本双向因果关系进行了分析,并在两个方向上都有一些无效的IVs。","authors":"Siyi Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mendelian randomization (MR) is a widely used method for assessing causal relationships between risk factors and outcomes using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs). While traditional MR assumes uni-directional causality, bi-directional MR aims to identify the true causal direction. In uni-directional MR, invalid IVs due to pleiotropy can violate assumptions and introduce biases. In bi-directional MR, traditional MR can be performed separately for each direction, but the presence of invalid IVs poses even greater challenges. We introduce a new bi-directional MR method incorporating stepwise selection (Bidir-SW) designed to address these challenges. Our approach leverages public genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets for two traits and uses model selection criteria to identify invalid IVs iteratively by stepwise selection. This method accounts for potential bi-directional causality in the presence of common invalid IVs for both directions, even if only GWAS summary statistics are provided. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate that our method outperforms traditional MR techniques, such as MR-Egger and inverse-variance weighted (IVW), with uncorrelated SNPs. We also provide simulations to compare our approach with existing transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) to show its effectiveness. Finally, we apply the proposed method to genetic traits such as CRP levels and BMI to explore possible bi-directional relationships among these traits. We also used the proposed method to discover causal protein biomarkers. Our findings suggest that the Bidir-SW approach is a powerful tool for bi-directional MR or TWAS, which can provide a valuable framework for future genetic epidemiology studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":34530,"journal":{"name":"HGG Advances","volume":" ","pages":"100449"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12145707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two-sample bi-directional causality between two traits with some invalid IVs in both directions using GWAS summary statistics.\",\"authors\":\"Siyi Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mendelian randomization (MR) is a widely used method for assessing causal relationships between risk factors and outcomes using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs). While traditional MR assumes uni-directional causality, bi-directional MR aims to identify the true causal direction. In uni-directional MR, invalid IVs due to pleiotropy can violate assumptions and introduce biases. In bi-directional MR, traditional MR can be performed separately for each direction, but the presence of invalid IVs poses even greater challenges. We introduce a new bi-directional MR method incorporating stepwise selection (Bidir-SW) designed to address these challenges. Our approach leverages public genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets for two traits and uses model selection criteria to identify invalid IVs iteratively by stepwise selection. This method accounts for potential bi-directional causality in the presence of common invalid IVs for both directions, even if only GWAS summary statistics are provided. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate that our method outperforms traditional MR techniques, such as MR-Egger and inverse-variance weighted (IVW), with uncorrelated SNPs. We also provide simulations to compare our approach with existing transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) to show its effectiveness. Finally, we apply the proposed method to genetic traits such as CRP levels and BMI to explore possible bi-directional relationships among these traits. We also used the proposed method to discover causal protein biomarkers. Our findings suggest that the Bidir-SW approach is a powerful tool for bi-directional MR or TWAS, which can provide a valuable framework for future genetic epidemiology studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HGG Advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12145707/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HGG Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100449\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HGG Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

孟德尔随机化(MR)是一种广泛使用的方法,用于评估风险因素和结果之间的因果关系,使用遗传变异作为工具变量(IVs)。传统的因果关系假设是单向的,而双向因果关系旨在确定真正的因果方向。在单向MR中,由于多效性而导致的无效iv可能违反假设并引入偏差。在双向磁共振中,传统的磁共振可以在每个方向上单独进行,但无效静脉的存在带来了更大的挑战。为了解决这些问题,我们引入了一种新的双向MR方法,该方法结合了逐步选择(Bidir-SW)。我们的方法利用两个性状的公共全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据集,并使用模型选择标准通过逐步选择迭代识别无效的IVs。即使只提供GWAS汇总统计数据,该方法也考虑了在两个方向上存在共同无效IVs的潜在双向因果关系。通过模拟研究,我们证明了我们的方法优于传统的MR技术,如MR- egger和IVW,具有不相关的snp。我们还提供了模拟,将我们的方法与现有的转录组全关联研究(TWAS)进行比较,以显示其有效性。最后,我们将提出的方法应用于遗传性状,如CRP水平和BMI,以探索这些性状之间可能的双向关系。我们还使用提出的方法来发现因果蛋白生物标志物。我们的研究结果表明,Bidir-SW方法是双向MR或TWAS的有力工具,可以为未来的遗传流行病学研究提供有价值的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two-sample bi-directional causality between two traits with some invalid IVs in both directions using GWAS summary statistics.

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a widely used method for assessing causal relationships between risk factors and outcomes using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs). While traditional MR assumes uni-directional causality, bi-directional MR aims to identify the true causal direction. In uni-directional MR, invalid IVs due to pleiotropy can violate assumptions and introduce biases. In bi-directional MR, traditional MR can be performed separately for each direction, but the presence of invalid IVs poses even greater challenges. We introduce a new bi-directional MR method incorporating stepwise selection (Bidir-SW) designed to address these challenges. Our approach leverages public genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets for two traits and uses model selection criteria to identify invalid IVs iteratively by stepwise selection. This method accounts for potential bi-directional causality in the presence of common invalid IVs for both directions, even if only GWAS summary statistics are provided. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate that our method outperforms traditional MR techniques, such as MR-Egger and inverse-variance weighted (IVW), with uncorrelated SNPs. We also provide simulations to compare our approach with existing transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) to show its effectiveness. Finally, we apply the proposed method to genetic traits such as CRP levels and BMI to explore possible bi-directional relationships among these traits. We also used the proposed method to discover causal protein biomarkers. Our findings suggest that the Bidir-SW approach is a powerful tool for bi-directional MR or TWAS, which can provide a valuable framework for future genetic epidemiology studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HGG Advances
HGG Advances Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信