Amal Y Zaman, Lama S Alrefai, Dorar F Alharbi, Rahaf A Khurmi, Leen M Abuanq, Ajyal A Aljohani, Ibrahim M Dighriri, Nada Elnugomi
{"title":"不孕症激素治疗后乳腺癌发病率:基于人群研究的荟萃分析。","authors":"Amal Y Zaman, Lama S Alrefai, Dorar F Alharbi, Rahaf A Khurmi, Leen M Abuanq, Ajyal A Aljohani, Ibrahim M Dighriri, Nada Elnugomi","doi":"10.15537/smj.2025.46.5.20240544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To comprehensively understand the relationship between infertility medications and the risk of breast cancer (BC) in females.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant literature search using different databases (PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Sciences) following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines was carried out from 2003-2023. Population-based studies comparing the incidence of BC after hormonal fertility treatment and a control group were included. In addition, random and fixed effect models were used to carry out meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 studies involving 92,555 women were included in this review. The pooled analysis using risk ratios (RRs) showed no evidence of increased BC risk associated with hormonal fertility medications (RR=1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.97-1.02], <i>p</i>=0.83). The level of heterogeneity, as indicated by the I² statistic, was low (32%), and the Q test was not statistically significant. Sensitivity analysis using a random-effects model yielded consistent findings, suggesting no increased BC development risk with infertility medications. Among the 4 studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs), a significant protective effect on BC risk was observed (HR=0.91, 95% CI: [0.88-0.94], <i>p</i><0.001). The heterogeneity was substantially high (I²=96%), and the Q test demonstrated statistical significance. Sensitivity analysis using a random-effects model showed that heterogeneity remained constant, suggesting that the heterogeneity was attributable to the methods utilized in the included studies rather than being a result of statistical heterogeneity. The overall effect, as determined by the HR, was 1.01 and was not statistically significant (<i>p</i>=0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis found no evidence of increased risk of BC following hormonal infertility treatment. However, the results should be illustrated cautiously, given the heterogeneity between studies.<b>PROSPERO No. ID: CRD42024569158</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":21453,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Medical Journal","volume":"46 5","pages":"441-449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12074055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast cancer incidence after hormonal treatment for infertility: A meta-analysis of population-based studies.\",\"authors\":\"Amal Y Zaman, Lama S Alrefai, Dorar F Alharbi, Rahaf A Khurmi, Leen M Abuanq, Ajyal A Aljohani, Ibrahim M Dighriri, Nada Elnugomi\",\"doi\":\"10.15537/smj.2025.46.5.20240544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To comprehensively understand the relationship between infertility medications and the risk of breast cancer (BC) in females.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant literature search using different databases (PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Sciences) following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines was carried out from 2003-2023. Population-based studies comparing the incidence of BC after hormonal fertility treatment and a control group were included. In addition, random and fixed effect models were used to carry out meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 studies involving 92,555 women were included in this review. The pooled analysis using risk ratios (RRs) showed no evidence of increased BC risk associated with hormonal fertility medications (RR=1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.97-1.02], <i>p</i>=0.83). The level of heterogeneity, as indicated by the I² statistic, was low (32%), and the Q test was not statistically significant. Sensitivity analysis using a random-effects model yielded consistent findings, suggesting no increased BC development risk with infertility medications. Among the 4 studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs), a significant protective effect on BC risk was observed (HR=0.91, 95% CI: [0.88-0.94], <i>p</i><0.001). The heterogeneity was substantially high (I²=96%), and the Q test demonstrated statistical significance. Sensitivity analysis using a random-effects model showed that heterogeneity remained constant, suggesting that the heterogeneity was attributable to the methods utilized in the included studies rather than being a result of statistical heterogeneity. The overall effect, as determined by the HR, was 1.01 and was not statistically significant (<i>p</i>=0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis found no evidence of increased risk of BC following hormonal infertility treatment. However, the results should be illustrated cautiously, given the heterogeneity between studies.<b>PROSPERO No. ID: CRD42024569158</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"46 5\",\"pages\":\"441-449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12074055/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2025.46.5.20240544\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2025.46.5.20240544","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:全面了解不孕药物治疗与女性乳腺癌发病风险的关系。方法:使用不同的数据库(PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus和Web of Sciences)按照2003-2023年系统评价和元分析指南的首选报告项目进行相关文献检索。以人群为基础的研究比较了激素生育治疗后和对照组的BC发病率。此外,采用随机效应模型和固定效应模型进行meta分析。结果:本综述共纳入了15项研究,涉及92,555名女性。使用风险比(RRs)进行的合并分析显示,没有证据表明激素生育药物会增加BC风险(RR=1.00, 95%可信区间[CI]: [0.97-1.02], p=0.83)。异质性水平,如I²统计量所示,较低(32%),Q检验无统计学意义。使用随机效应模型的敏感性分析得出一致的结果,表明不孕药物不会增加BC的发展风险。在报告危险比(HR)的4项研究中,观察到对BC风险有显著的保护作用(HR=0.91, 95% CI: [0.88-0.94], pp=0.94)。结论:本荟萃分析未发现激素性不孕症治疗后BC风险增加的证据。然而,考虑到研究之间的异质性,结果应该谨慎说明。普洛斯彼罗。ID: CRD42024569158。
Breast cancer incidence after hormonal treatment for infertility: A meta-analysis of population-based studies.
Objectives: To comprehensively understand the relationship between infertility medications and the risk of breast cancer (BC) in females.
Methods: Relevant literature search using different databases (PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Sciences) following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines was carried out from 2003-2023. Population-based studies comparing the incidence of BC after hormonal fertility treatment and a control group were included. In addition, random and fixed effect models were used to carry out meta-analyses.
Results: A total of 15 studies involving 92,555 women were included in this review. The pooled analysis using risk ratios (RRs) showed no evidence of increased BC risk associated with hormonal fertility medications (RR=1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.97-1.02], p=0.83). The level of heterogeneity, as indicated by the I² statistic, was low (32%), and the Q test was not statistically significant. Sensitivity analysis using a random-effects model yielded consistent findings, suggesting no increased BC development risk with infertility medications. Among the 4 studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs), a significant protective effect on BC risk was observed (HR=0.91, 95% CI: [0.88-0.94], p<0.001). The heterogeneity was substantially high (I²=96%), and the Q test demonstrated statistical significance. Sensitivity analysis using a random-effects model showed that heterogeneity remained constant, suggesting that the heterogeneity was attributable to the methods utilized in the included studies rather than being a result of statistical heterogeneity. The overall effect, as determined by the HR, was 1.01 and was not statistically significant (p=0.94).
Conclusion: This meta-analysis found no evidence of increased risk of BC following hormonal infertility treatment. However, the results should be illustrated cautiously, given the heterogeneity between studies.PROSPERO No. ID: CRD42024569158.
期刊介绍:
The Saudi Medical Journal is a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal. It is an open access journal, with content released under a Creative Commons attribution-noncommercial license.
The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, Systematic Reviews, Case Reports, Brief Communication, Brief Report, Clinical Note, Clinical Image, Editorials, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Student Corner.