{"title":"实用主义与循证医学——不是非此即彼。","authors":"Piotr Szawarski, David Hillebrandt","doi":"10.1093/qjmed/hcaf086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pragmatism in medicine remains largely unacknowledged, undefined and un-described. We argue that it should not be viewed as an antithesis to evidence based approach, but rather as a way of solving a clinical problem whilst acknowledging limitations arising from the context in which the care is provided. The imperfection of the approach may be its strength, as uncertainty demands continuous re-appraisal of the situation. Existence of readily available evidence, compiled in a guideline may be an advantage, but is not a prerequisite for success. Indeed, the evidence based approach is not perfect and its application meets a number of limitations. We would like to assert that pragmatic approach focused on seeking the most available, given therapeutic context, solutions remains the most available and efficient in present day medical practice. It fills many holes between the academic perfection of research and vast heterogeneity of individual patients and clinical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20806,"journal":{"name":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pragmatic Versus Evidence Based Medicine-it's not either-or.\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Szawarski, David Hillebrandt\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/qjmed/hcaf086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pragmatism in medicine remains largely unacknowledged, undefined and un-described. We argue that it should not be viewed as an antithesis to evidence based approach, but rather as a way of solving a clinical problem whilst acknowledging limitations arising from the context in which the care is provided. The imperfection of the approach may be its strength, as uncertainty demands continuous re-appraisal of the situation. Existence of readily available evidence, compiled in a guideline may be an advantage, but is not a prerequisite for success. Indeed, the evidence based approach is not perfect and its application meets a number of limitations. We would like to assert that pragmatic approach focused on seeking the most available, given therapeutic context, solutions remains the most available and efficient in present day medical practice. It fills many holes between the academic perfection of research and vast heterogeneity of individual patients and clinical contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaf086\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaf086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pragmatic Versus Evidence Based Medicine-it's not either-or.
Pragmatism in medicine remains largely unacknowledged, undefined and un-described. We argue that it should not be viewed as an antithesis to evidence based approach, but rather as a way of solving a clinical problem whilst acknowledging limitations arising from the context in which the care is provided. The imperfection of the approach may be its strength, as uncertainty demands continuous re-appraisal of the situation. Existence of readily available evidence, compiled in a guideline may be an advantage, but is not a prerequisite for success. Indeed, the evidence based approach is not perfect and its application meets a number of limitations. We would like to assert that pragmatic approach focused on seeking the most available, given therapeutic context, solutions remains the most available and efficient in present day medical practice. It fills many holes between the academic perfection of research and vast heterogeneity of individual patients and clinical contexts.
期刊介绍:
QJM, a renowned and reputable general medical journal, has been a prominent source of knowledge in the field of internal medicine. With a steadfast commitment to advancing medical science and practice, it features a selection of rigorously reviewed articles.
Released on a monthly basis, QJM encompasses a wide range of article types. These include original papers that contribute innovative research, editorials that offer expert opinions, and reviews that provide comprehensive analyses of specific topics. The journal also presents commentary papers aimed at initiating discussions on controversial subjects and allocates a dedicated section for reader correspondence.
In summary, QJM's reputable standing stems from its enduring presence in the medical community, consistent publication schedule, and diverse range of content designed to inform and engage readers.