“我们有一个行为支持计划,让我们有一个心理健康支持计划”:工作人员、居民和家庭照顾者对长期护理中居民心理健康的理解、应对和促进的观点。

Deborah Brooks, Deepa Sriram, Claire V Burley, Rachel Brimelow, Nadeeka N Dissanayaka
{"title":"“我们有一个行为支持计划,让我们有一个心理健康支持计划”:工作人员、居民和家庭照顾者对长期护理中居民心理健康的理解、应对和促进的观点。","authors":"Deborah Brooks, Deepa Sriram, Claire V Burley, Rachel Brimelow, Nadeeka N Dissanayaka","doi":"10.1177/14713012251334170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Up to two thirds of people living in long-term care homes experience mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression. In addition, over half of residents have cognitive impairment or dementia. However, the quality of mental health care provided in residential care homes is often poor, and the use of mental health quality indictors is lacking. As the first step in a larger project to develop mental health quality indicators for long-term care (MHICare project), this study aimed to explore factors considered important for understanding and responding to mental health conditions and promoting mental well-being of residents. Individual interviews and small group discussions were conducted with twelve residents (both with and without dementia), eight family carers of residents with dementia, and six care home staff members, from across Australia. Qualitative data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach to generate themes and a deductive approach to generate factors and map these to a Balanced Score Card quality indicator framework. Four main factors with several inter-related themes were identified: (1) Resident-related (Transitional impacts, Social connections and active engagement, and Pre-existing and co-morbid conditions); (2) Care and Communication Practices (Assessment and care strategies, Person-centred mental health care, Cultural and generational communication differences, and Staff handover and knowledge sharing); (3) Staff-related (Staff mental health awareness, Staff knowledge, practical skills and training needs, and Staff values and attitudes); and (4) Organisational (Internal staffing levels, Access to external mental health professionals, and Provision of volunteer programs). Findings will inform the key areas and initial content for mental health indicators for use in residential care homes. Once developed, these have the potential to highlight both strengths and gaps in current mental health care practices, and drive quality improvement initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251334170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"We have a behaviour support plan, let's have a mental health support plan\\\": Perspectives of staff, residents and family carers on understanding, responding to and promoting the mental health of residents within long-term care.\",\"authors\":\"Deborah Brooks, Deepa Sriram, Claire V Burley, Rachel Brimelow, Nadeeka N Dissanayaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14713012251334170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Up to two thirds of people living in long-term care homes experience mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression. In addition, over half of residents have cognitive impairment or dementia. However, the quality of mental health care provided in residential care homes is often poor, and the use of mental health quality indictors is lacking. As the first step in a larger project to develop mental health quality indicators for long-term care (MHICare project), this study aimed to explore factors considered important for understanding and responding to mental health conditions and promoting mental well-being of residents. Individual interviews and small group discussions were conducted with twelve residents (both with and without dementia), eight family carers of residents with dementia, and six care home staff members, from across Australia. Qualitative data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach to generate themes and a deductive approach to generate factors and map these to a Balanced Score Card quality indicator framework. Four main factors with several inter-related themes were identified: (1) Resident-related (Transitional impacts, Social connections and active engagement, and Pre-existing and co-morbid conditions); (2) Care and Communication Practices (Assessment and care strategies, Person-centred mental health care, Cultural and generational communication differences, and Staff handover and knowledge sharing); (3) Staff-related (Staff mental health awareness, Staff knowledge, practical skills and training needs, and Staff values and attitudes); and (4) Organisational (Internal staffing levels, Access to external mental health professionals, and Provision of volunteer programs). Findings will inform the key areas and initial content for mental health indicators for use in residential care homes. Once developed, these have the potential to highlight both strengths and gaps in current mental health care practices, and drive quality improvement initiatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia (London, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"14713012251334170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251334170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251334170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

住在长期护理院的人中,多达三分之二的人有焦虑和抑郁等心理健康问题。此外,超过一半的居民有认知障碍或痴呆症。然而,寄宿护理院提供的精神卫生保健的质量往往很差,而且缺乏使用精神卫生质量指标。作为长期照护心理健康质量指标研究的第一步,本研究旨在探索了解和应对居民心理健康状况、促进居民心理健康的重要因素。对来自澳大利亚各地的12名居民(有和没有痴呆症)、8名痴呆症居民的家庭护理人员和6名养老院工作人员进行了个人访谈和小组讨论。定性数据分析使用归纳专题分析方法来产生主题和演绎方法来产生因素,并将这些映射到平衡计分卡质量指标框架。确定了具有若干相互关联主题的四个主要因素:(1)居民相关(过渡影响、社会联系和积极参与、既存和共病条件);(2)护理和沟通实践(评估和护理策略、以人为本的精神卫生保健、文化和代际沟通差异、工作人员交接和知识共享);(3)与工作人员有关(工作人员的心理健康意识、工作人员的知识、实际技能和培训需求、工作人员的价值观和态度);(4)组织(内部人员配备水平,获得外部心理健康专家的机会,以及提供志愿者计划)。调查结果将为精神健康指标的主要领域和初步内容提供信息,以供寄宿护理院使用。一旦制定出来,这些指南就有可能突出当前精神卫生保健实践中的优势和差距,并推动质量改进举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"We have a behaviour support plan, let's have a mental health support plan": Perspectives of staff, residents and family carers on understanding, responding to and promoting the mental health of residents within long-term care.

Up to two thirds of people living in long-term care homes experience mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression. In addition, over half of residents have cognitive impairment or dementia. However, the quality of mental health care provided in residential care homes is often poor, and the use of mental health quality indictors is lacking. As the first step in a larger project to develop mental health quality indicators for long-term care (MHICare project), this study aimed to explore factors considered important for understanding and responding to mental health conditions and promoting mental well-being of residents. Individual interviews and small group discussions were conducted with twelve residents (both with and without dementia), eight family carers of residents with dementia, and six care home staff members, from across Australia. Qualitative data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach to generate themes and a deductive approach to generate factors and map these to a Balanced Score Card quality indicator framework. Four main factors with several inter-related themes were identified: (1) Resident-related (Transitional impacts, Social connections and active engagement, and Pre-existing and co-morbid conditions); (2) Care and Communication Practices (Assessment and care strategies, Person-centred mental health care, Cultural and generational communication differences, and Staff handover and knowledge sharing); (3) Staff-related (Staff mental health awareness, Staff knowledge, practical skills and training needs, and Staff values and attitudes); and (4) Organisational (Internal staffing levels, Access to external mental health professionals, and Provision of volunteer programs). Findings will inform the key areas and initial content for mental health indicators for use in residential care homes. Once developed, these have the potential to highlight both strengths and gaps in current mental health care practices, and drive quality improvement initiatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信