子宫内膜腺显像与细泡检测评价子宫内膜容受性的比较分析。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Min-Bo Zhu, Bei-Lei Chen, Meng Cen, Li-Ping Chen, Zheng Shi
{"title":"子宫内膜腺显像与细泡检测评价子宫内膜容受性的比较分析。","authors":"Min-Bo Zhu, Bei-Lei Chen, Meng Cen, Li-Ping Chen, Zheng Shi","doi":"10.1186/s12958-025-01395-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to obtain high-resolution endometrial gland images under high-definition hysteroscopy from in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) patients and perform image recognition to analyze their density and opening size. Concurrently, the number and morphology of pinopodes in the endometrial samples were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The objective was to compare the correlation between the two methods in evaluating endometrial receptivity and predicting pregnancy outcomes and to assess the consistency between the quantitative curves and pregnancy outcomes of the two methods in the cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>67 patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery who had undergone controlled ovarian hyperstimulation treatment within 1-3 menstrual cycles before the surgery were selected. Hysteroscopic exploration was performed on the 3-5 days after ovulation (during the implantation window period). Endometrial images and tissues were collected under hysteroscopy. The endometrial glands were counted, the sizes of gland openings were calculated using an image recognition algorithm, and the number and morphology of endometrial pinopodes were observed through SEM. All patients underwent embryo transfer surgery within 1-3 menstrual cycles after hysteroscopy. Patients were divided into pregnancy and non-pregnancy groups based on pregnancy outcomes. The density and size of endometrial glands, as well as the number and morphology of pinopodes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The endometrial gland density and the size of the endometrial gland opening in the pregnancy group were higher than that in the non-pregnancy group (P < 0.05). In contrast, both the average pinopode count per image and the developmental maturity grading of pinopodes were significantly higher in the pregnancy group compared to the non-pregnancy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both hysteroscopic endometrial gland image recognition technology and pinopode detection can effectively reflect endometrial receptivity and predict pregnancy outcomes. However, image recognition technology has clear economic and promotional advantages.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":21011,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology","volume":"23 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of endometrial gland imaging and pinopode detection for assessing endometrial receptivity.\",\"authors\":\"Min-Bo Zhu, Bei-Lei Chen, Meng Cen, Li-Ping Chen, Zheng Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12958-025-01395-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to obtain high-resolution endometrial gland images under high-definition hysteroscopy from in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) patients and perform image recognition to analyze their density and opening size. Concurrently, the number and morphology of pinopodes in the endometrial samples were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The objective was to compare the correlation between the two methods in evaluating endometrial receptivity and predicting pregnancy outcomes and to assess the consistency between the quantitative curves and pregnancy outcomes of the two methods in the cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>67 patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery who had undergone controlled ovarian hyperstimulation treatment within 1-3 menstrual cycles before the surgery were selected. Hysteroscopic exploration was performed on the 3-5 days after ovulation (during the implantation window period). Endometrial images and tissues were collected under hysteroscopy. The endometrial glands were counted, the sizes of gland openings were calculated using an image recognition algorithm, and the number and morphology of endometrial pinopodes were observed through SEM. All patients underwent embryo transfer surgery within 1-3 menstrual cycles after hysteroscopy. Patients were divided into pregnancy and non-pregnancy groups based on pregnancy outcomes. The density and size of endometrial glands, as well as the number and morphology of pinopodes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The endometrial gland density and the size of the endometrial gland opening in the pregnancy group were higher than that in the non-pregnancy group (P < 0.05). In contrast, both the average pinopode count per image and the developmental maturity grading of pinopodes were significantly higher in the pregnancy group compared to the non-pregnancy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both hysteroscopic endometrial gland image recognition technology and pinopode detection can effectively reflect endometrial receptivity and predict pregnancy outcomes. However, image recognition technology has clear economic and promotional advantages.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036253/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-025-01395-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-025-01395-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在获得体外受精和胚胎移植(IVF-ET)患者在高清宫腔镜下的高分辨率子宫内膜腺图像,并进行图像识别,分析其密度和开口大小。同时,用扫描电镜(SEM)观察子宫内膜样品中足跖的数量和形态。目的是比较两种方法在评估子宫内膜容受性和预测妊娠结局方面的相关性,并评估两种方法在队列研究中的定量曲线与妊娠结局的一致性。方法:选择术前1 ~ 3个月经周期内接受控制性卵巢过度刺激治疗的宫腔镜手术患者67例。在排卵后3 ~ 5天(着床窗口期)行宫腔镜探查。在宫腔镜下采集子宫内膜图像和组织。对子宫内膜腺进行计数,利用图像识别算法计算腺体开口大小,并通过扫描电镜观察子宫内膜足的数量和形态。所有患者均在宫腔镜检查后1-3个月经周期内行胚胎移植手术。根据妊娠结局将患者分为妊娠组和非妊娠组。比较两组子宫内膜腺的密度、大小以及足部的数量和形态。结果:妊娠组子宫内膜腺密度及子宫内膜腺开口大小均高于非妊娠组(P)。结论:宫腔镜子宫内膜腺图像识别技术及pinopode检测均能有效反映子宫内膜容受性,预测妊娠结局。然而,图像识别技术具有明显的经济和推广优势。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative analysis of endometrial gland imaging and pinopode detection for assessing endometrial receptivity.

Comparative analysis of endometrial gland imaging and pinopode detection for assessing endometrial receptivity.

Comparative analysis of endometrial gland imaging and pinopode detection for assessing endometrial receptivity.

Comparative analysis of endometrial gland imaging and pinopode detection for assessing endometrial receptivity.

Background: This study aimed to obtain high-resolution endometrial gland images under high-definition hysteroscopy from in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) patients and perform image recognition to analyze their density and opening size. Concurrently, the number and morphology of pinopodes in the endometrial samples were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The objective was to compare the correlation between the two methods in evaluating endometrial receptivity and predicting pregnancy outcomes and to assess the consistency between the quantitative curves and pregnancy outcomes of the two methods in the cohort study.

Methods: 67 patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery who had undergone controlled ovarian hyperstimulation treatment within 1-3 menstrual cycles before the surgery were selected. Hysteroscopic exploration was performed on the 3-5 days after ovulation (during the implantation window period). Endometrial images and tissues were collected under hysteroscopy. The endometrial glands were counted, the sizes of gland openings were calculated using an image recognition algorithm, and the number and morphology of endometrial pinopodes were observed through SEM. All patients underwent embryo transfer surgery within 1-3 menstrual cycles after hysteroscopy. Patients were divided into pregnancy and non-pregnancy groups based on pregnancy outcomes. The density and size of endometrial glands, as well as the number and morphology of pinopodes were compared between the two groups.

Results: The endometrial gland density and the size of the endometrial gland opening in the pregnancy group were higher than that in the non-pregnancy group (P < 0.05). In contrast, both the average pinopode count per image and the developmental maturity grading of pinopodes were significantly higher in the pregnancy group compared to the non-pregnancy group.

Conclusions: Both hysteroscopic endometrial gland image recognition technology and pinopode detection can effectively reflect endometrial receptivity and predict pregnancy outcomes. However, image recognition technology has clear economic and promotional advantages.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology publishes and disseminates high-quality results from excellent research in the reproductive sciences. The journal publishes on topics covering gametogenesis, fertilization, early embryonic development, embryo-uterus interaction, reproductive development, pregnancy, uterine biology, endocrinology of reproduction, control of reproduction, reproductive immunology, neuroendocrinology, and veterinary and human reproductive medicine, including all vertebrate species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信