Harris R Lieberman, John A Caldwell, Emily K Farina, Lauren A Thompson, Joseph J Knapik, Stefan M Pasiakos, James P McClung
{"title":"在高压力环境下,暴露前睡眠和情绪状态的差异与成功和失败有关:特种部队的选择。","authors":"Harris R Lieberman, John A Caldwell, Emily K Farina, Lauren A Thompson, Joseph J Knapik, Stefan M Pasiakos, James P McClung","doi":"10.1002/smi.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The U.S. Army Special Forces Assessment and Selection course (SFAS) is an extremely stressful, physically and mentally challenging 19-20 days long selection procedure. Only 30%-40% of soldiers who volunteer for it complete it. The purpose of SFAS is to identify soldiers who can complete 1-2 years of physically and mentally challenging training for the Special Forces and be successful Special Forces soldiers thereafter. This study examined association of pre-course self-reported mood state and sleep quality and quantity with subsequent success or failure at SFAS. Data from 780 male soldiers collected in 2015-2017 were analysed. Prior to SFAS, the Profile of Mood States (POMS), Dimension of Anger Reactivity (DAR), Duke University Social Support Questionnaire (Duke-SSQ), General Anxiety Disorder and Depression inventories (GAD-7), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were administered. Group differences among these variables and their ability to predict selection versus non-selection were assessed. There were significant differences in pre-SFAS mood and sleep in selected versus non-selected volunteers. Selected candidates reported more positive mood (POMS vigour, friendliness), less negative mood (POMS depression, anger, fatigue, confusion), less anger (DAR), and less social support (Duke-SSQ). Selected candidates reported longer and higher quality sleep (PSQI) than non-selected soldiers. These differences were not sufficient to serve as an accurate predictive model based on logistic regression, as the best-fit model accounted for 4.9% of the variance. In conclusion, there were differences in pre-course mood state and sleep between those who succeeded or failed a stressful course that selects individuals for elite military training and service, but they were not of sufficient strength to predict individual success of failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":51175,"journal":{"name":"Stress and Health","volume":"41 2","pages":"e70031"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Sleep and Mood State Prior to Exposure are Associated With Success and Failure in a High Stress Environment: Special Forces Selection.\",\"authors\":\"Harris R Lieberman, John A Caldwell, Emily K Farina, Lauren A Thompson, Joseph J Knapik, Stefan M Pasiakos, James P McClung\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/smi.70031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The U.S. Army Special Forces Assessment and Selection course (SFAS) is an extremely stressful, physically and mentally challenging 19-20 days long selection procedure. Only 30%-40% of soldiers who volunteer for it complete it. The purpose of SFAS is to identify soldiers who can complete 1-2 years of physically and mentally challenging training for the Special Forces and be successful Special Forces soldiers thereafter. This study examined association of pre-course self-reported mood state and sleep quality and quantity with subsequent success or failure at SFAS. Data from 780 male soldiers collected in 2015-2017 were analysed. Prior to SFAS, the Profile of Mood States (POMS), Dimension of Anger Reactivity (DAR), Duke University Social Support Questionnaire (Duke-SSQ), General Anxiety Disorder and Depression inventories (GAD-7), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were administered. Group differences among these variables and their ability to predict selection versus non-selection were assessed. There were significant differences in pre-SFAS mood and sleep in selected versus non-selected volunteers. Selected candidates reported more positive mood (POMS vigour, friendliness), less negative mood (POMS depression, anger, fatigue, confusion), less anger (DAR), and less social support (Duke-SSQ). Selected candidates reported longer and higher quality sleep (PSQI) than non-selected soldiers. These differences were not sufficient to serve as an accurate predictive model based on logistic regression, as the best-fit model accounted for 4.9% of the variance. In conclusion, there were differences in pre-course mood state and sleep between those who succeeded or failed a stressful course that selects individuals for elite military training and service, but they were not of sufficient strength to predict individual success of failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stress and Health\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"e70031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stress and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.70031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.70031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differences in Sleep and Mood State Prior to Exposure are Associated With Success and Failure in a High Stress Environment: Special Forces Selection.
The U.S. Army Special Forces Assessment and Selection course (SFAS) is an extremely stressful, physically and mentally challenging 19-20 days long selection procedure. Only 30%-40% of soldiers who volunteer for it complete it. The purpose of SFAS is to identify soldiers who can complete 1-2 years of physically and mentally challenging training for the Special Forces and be successful Special Forces soldiers thereafter. This study examined association of pre-course self-reported mood state and sleep quality and quantity with subsequent success or failure at SFAS. Data from 780 male soldiers collected in 2015-2017 were analysed. Prior to SFAS, the Profile of Mood States (POMS), Dimension of Anger Reactivity (DAR), Duke University Social Support Questionnaire (Duke-SSQ), General Anxiety Disorder and Depression inventories (GAD-7), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were administered. Group differences among these variables and their ability to predict selection versus non-selection were assessed. There were significant differences in pre-SFAS mood and sleep in selected versus non-selected volunteers. Selected candidates reported more positive mood (POMS vigour, friendliness), less negative mood (POMS depression, anger, fatigue, confusion), less anger (DAR), and less social support (Duke-SSQ). Selected candidates reported longer and higher quality sleep (PSQI) than non-selected soldiers. These differences were not sufficient to serve as an accurate predictive model based on logistic regression, as the best-fit model accounted for 4.9% of the variance. In conclusion, there were differences in pre-course mood state and sleep between those who succeeded or failed a stressful course that selects individuals for elite military training and service, but they were not of sufficient strength to predict individual success of failure.
期刊介绍:
Stress is a normal component of life and a number of mechanisms exist to cope with its effects. The stresses that challenge man"s existence in our modern society may result in failure of these coping mechanisms, with resultant stress-induced illness. The aim of the journal therefore is to provide a forum for discussion of all aspects of stress which affect the individual in both health and disease.
The Journal explores the subject from as many aspects as possible, so that when stress becomes a consideration, health information can be presented as to the best ways by which to minimise its effects.