{"title":"在胃肠外科手术中使用滑索皮肤闭合装置:一项评估伤口感染发生率、手术时间和美容的多中心随机对照试验。","authors":"Ayato Obana, Takuya Minagawa, Ayako Shimada, Junko Mukohyama, Yuki Hirano, Sojun Hoshimoto, Takashi Oyama, Tsuruta Masashi, Takashi Ishida, Takuya Tamura, Kyoichi Matsuzaki, Mitsuru Takaku, Hirotoshi Ohara, Motoi Koyama, Masahiro Shinoda, Tatsushi Suwa, Osamu Itano","doi":"10.1007/s00595-025-03043-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subcuticular sutures, which are effective and cosmetically advantageous in gastroenterological surgery, are time-consuming and heavily dependent on the surgeon's technical expertise. This study aims to evaluate whether Zipline skin closure could be an alternative to subcuticular sutures in gastroenterological surgery. A multicenter randomized controlled trial (UMIN000048169) was conducted on 76 patients who underwent elective gastroenterological surgery. The patients were randomized to either the Zipline group (N = 35) or the subcuticular suture group (N = 41). Primary outcomes included skin closure time and secondary outcomes included postoperative wound complications and cosmetic results, assessed 6 months post-surgery, using the Stony Book Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). The Zipline group demonstrated significantly shorter closure times than the suture group (median: 438 s [406-526] vs. 575 s [537-638]; p = 0.003). This difference was more pronounced for incisions > 55 mm (median:399 s [307-533] vs. 605 s [493-736]; p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in wound infection rates (5.7% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.46) or SBSES scores (median: 4.0 [4.0-5.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-5.0; p = 0.82) between the two groups. The Zipline device reduced the skin closure time in gastroenterological surgery significantly, particularly for large incisions, without compromising wound healing or cosmetic outcomes. These findings suggest that the Zipline system may be a viable alternative to traditional subcuticular sutures in gastroenterological procedures, potentially promoting operating room efficiency without compromising surgical quality or patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":"1488-1496"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of a zipline skin closure device in gastroenterological surgery: a multicenter randomized controlled trial assessing wound infection incidence, operation time, and cosmesis.\",\"authors\":\"Ayato Obana, Takuya Minagawa, Ayako Shimada, Junko Mukohyama, Yuki Hirano, Sojun Hoshimoto, Takashi Oyama, Tsuruta Masashi, Takashi Ishida, Takuya Tamura, Kyoichi Matsuzaki, Mitsuru Takaku, Hirotoshi Ohara, Motoi Koyama, Masahiro Shinoda, Tatsushi Suwa, Osamu Itano\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00595-025-03043-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Subcuticular sutures, which are effective and cosmetically advantageous in gastroenterological surgery, are time-consuming and heavily dependent on the surgeon's technical expertise. This study aims to evaluate whether Zipline skin closure could be an alternative to subcuticular sutures in gastroenterological surgery. A multicenter randomized controlled trial (UMIN000048169) was conducted on 76 patients who underwent elective gastroenterological surgery. The patients were randomized to either the Zipline group (N = 35) or the subcuticular suture group (N = 41). Primary outcomes included skin closure time and secondary outcomes included postoperative wound complications and cosmetic results, assessed 6 months post-surgery, using the Stony Book Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). The Zipline group demonstrated significantly shorter closure times than the suture group (median: 438 s [406-526] vs. 575 s [537-638]; p = 0.003). This difference was more pronounced for incisions > 55 mm (median:399 s [307-533] vs. 605 s [493-736]; p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in wound infection rates (5.7% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.46) or SBSES scores (median: 4.0 [4.0-5.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-5.0; p = 0.82) between the two groups. The Zipline device reduced the skin closure time in gastroenterological surgery significantly, particularly for large incisions, without compromising wound healing or cosmetic outcomes. These findings suggest that the Zipline system may be a viable alternative to traditional subcuticular sutures in gastroenterological procedures, potentially promoting operating room efficiency without compromising surgical quality or patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery Today\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1488-1496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03043-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03043-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在胃肠外科手术中,皮下缝合是一种有效且具有美容优势的方法,但它耗时且严重依赖于外科医生的技术专长。本研究旨在评估在胃肠外科手术中,Zipline皮肤闭合是否可以替代皮下缝合。一项多中心随机对照试验(UMIN000048169)对76例接受择期胃肠外科手术的患者进行了研究。患者随机分为Zipline组(N = 35)和皮下缝合组(N = 41)。主要结局包括皮肤闭合时间,次要结局包括术后伤口并发症和美容结果,使用Stony Book疤痕评估量表(SBSES)评估术后6个月。Zipline组闭合时间明显短于缝合组(中位数:438 s [406-526] vs. 575 s [537-638];p = 0.003)。这种差异在切口bb0 ~ 55mm时更为明显(中位数:399秒[307-533]vs. 605秒[493-736];p = 0.001)。两组的伤口感染率无显著差异(5.7% vs. 2.4%;p = 0.46)或SBSES评分(中位数:4.0 [4.0-5.0]vs. 4.0 [3.0-5.0;P = 0.82)。Zipline装置显著减少了胃肠外科手术的皮肤闭合时间,特别是对于大切口,而不影响伤口愈合或美容效果。这些研究结果表明,Zipline系统可能是胃肠外科手术中传统皮下缝合的可行替代方案,可能在不影响手术质量或患者预后的情况下提高手术室效率。
Use of a zipline skin closure device in gastroenterological surgery: a multicenter randomized controlled trial assessing wound infection incidence, operation time, and cosmesis.
Subcuticular sutures, which are effective and cosmetically advantageous in gastroenterological surgery, are time-consuming and heavily dependent on the surgeon's technical expertise. This study aims to evaluate whether Zipline skin closure could be an alternative to subcuticular sutures in gastroenterological surgery. A multicenter randomized controlled trial (UMIN000048169) was conducted on 76 patients who underwent elective gastroenterological surgery. The patients were randomized to either the Zipline group (N = 35) or the subcuticular suture group (N = 41). Primary outcomes included skin closure time and secondary outcomes included postoperative wound complications and cosmetic results, assessed 6 months post-surgery, using the Stony Book Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). The Zipline group demonstrated significantly shorter closure times than the suture group (median: 438 s [406-526] vs. 575 s [537-638]; p = 0.003). This difference was more pronounced for incisions > 55 mm (median:399 s [307-533] vs. 605 s [493-736]; p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in wound infection rates (5.7% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.46) or SBSES scores (median: 4.0 [4.0-5.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-5.0; p = 0.82) between the two groups. The Zipline device reduced the skin closure time in gastroenterological surgery significantly, particularly for large incisions, without compromising wound healing or cosmetic outcomes. These findings suggest that the Zipline system may be a viable alternative to traditional subcuticular sutures in gastroenterological procedures, potentially promoting operating room efficiency without compromising surgical quality or patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it").
The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.