Wenzhen Jin, Yibin Zhang, Shu Pang, Dongdong Yao, Yiwen Huang
{"title":"标签外使用斑蝥素酸钠和维生素B6注射治疗癌症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案。","authors":"Wenzhen Jin, Yibin Zhang, Shu Pang, Dongdong Yao, Yiwen Huang","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02826-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In China, sodium cantharidinate/vitamin B6 (SC/VB6) injection has been approved since 2002 for the treatment of lung cancer and primary liver cancer. In addition to these authorized indications, clinical application of SC/VB6 is also common in various other types of cancer. However, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding on this topic. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to consolidate evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of off-label use of SC/VB6 in oncology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>International databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus, as well as Chinese databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and Wanfang, will be searched from the inception to 31 December 2024. Comparative studies that evaluated the add-on effect of SC/VB6 to conventional cancer treatments against the use of conventional treatments alone will be considered in the scope of this review. The primary outcomes are objective response rate and performance status. Secondary outcomes are disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Depending on heterogeneity, data will be synthesized using either the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect or the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect model. Subgroup analyses will be conducted for the following variables: type of cancer, study design, SC/VB6 dosage, treatment duration, and combined therapies, provided that each subgroup contains at least two studies. Sensitivity analyses will be performed on efficacy outcomes. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) will be utilized to appraise the overall quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review will encompass both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies, thereby enabling us to synthesize and assess evidence across experimental and real-world observational settings. Our findings will contribute to a better understanding on the benefit-risk profile regarding the off-label use of SC/VB6 in oncology, guiding the trajectory of future research, and offering a robust scientific foundation to inform clinical and regulatory decision-making process.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024504977.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11984136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Off-label use of sodium cantharidinate and vitamin B6 injection in cancer: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wenzhen Jin, Yibin Zhang, Shu Pang, Dongdong Yao, Yiwen Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-025-02826-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In China, sodium cantharidinate/vitamin B6 (SC/VB6) injection has been approved since 2002 for the treatment of lung cancer and primary liver cancer. In addition to these authorized indications, clinical application of SC/VB6 is also common in various other types of cancer. However, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding on this topic. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to consolidate evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of off-label use of SC/VB6 in oncology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>International databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus, as well as Chinese databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and Wanfang, will be searched from the inception to 31 December 2024. Comparative studies that evaluated the add-on effect of SC/VB6 to conventional cancer treatments against the use of conventional treatments alone will be considered in the scope of this review. The primary outcomes are objective response rate and performance status. Secondary outcomes are disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Depending on heterogeneity, data will be synthesized using either the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect or the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect model. Subgroup analyses will be conducted for the following variables: type of cancer, study design, SC/VB6 dosage, treatment duration, and combined therapies, provided that each subgroup contains at least two studies. Sensitivity analyses will be performed on efficacy outcomes. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) will be utilized to appraise the overall quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review will encompass both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies, thereby enabling us to synthesize and assess evidence across experimental and real-world observational settings. Our findings will contribute to a better understanding on the benefit-risk profile regarding the off-label use of SC/VB6 in oncology, guiding the trajectory of future research, and offering a robust scientific foundation to inform clinical and regulatory decision-making process.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024504977.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11984136/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02826-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02826-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在中国,斑蝥素酸钠/维生素B6 (SC/VB6)注射剂自2002年起被批准用于治疗肺癌和原发性肝癌。除了这些被批准的适应症,SC/VB6的临床应用在其他各种类型的癌症中也很常见。然而,人们对这一主题缺乏全面的认识。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在巩固关于核准外使用SC/VB6在肿瘤治疗中的有效性和安全性的证据。方法:检索国际数据库包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CINAHL Plus,中文数据库包括中国知网(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方等数据库,检索时间为开刊至2024年12月31日。评估SC/VB6对常规癌症治疗的附加效应与单独使用常规治疗的比较研究将被纳入本综述的范围。主要观察指标为客观有效率和临床表现状况。次要结局是疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良事件(ae)。根据异质性,将使用Mantel-Haenszel固定效应或DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型来合成数据。将对以下变量进行亚组分析:癌症类型、研究设计、SC/VB6剂量、治疗持续时间和联合治疗,前提是每个亚组至少包含两项研究。对疗效结果进行敏感性分析。建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)将用于评估证据的整体质量。讨论:本综述将包括随机对照试验(rct)和队列研究,从而使我们能够综合和评估实验和现实观察环境中的证据。我们的研究结果将有助于更好地了解SC/VB6在肿瘤学中超说明书使用的收益-风险状况,指导未来研究的轨迹,并为临床和监管决策过程提供坚实的科学基础。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42024504977。
Off-label use of sodium cantharidinate and vitamin B6 injection in cancer: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: In China, sodium cantharidinate/vitamin B6 (SC/VB6) injection has been approved since 2002 for the treatment of lung cancer and primary liver cancer. In addition to these authorized indications, clinical application of SC/VB6 is also common in various other types of cancer. However, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding on this topic. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to consolidate evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of off-label use of SC/VB6 in oncology.
Methods: International databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus, as well as Chinese databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and Wanfang, will be searched from the inception to 31 December 2024. Comparative studies that evaluated the add-on effect of SC/VB6 to conventional cancer treatments against the use of conventional treatments alone will be considered in the scope of this review. The primary outcomes are objective response rate and performance status. Secondary outcomes are disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Depending on heterogeneity, data will be synthesized using either the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect or the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect model. Subgroup analyses will be conducted for the following variables: type of cancer, study design, SC/VB6 dosage, treatment duration, and combined therapies, provided that each subgroup contains at least two studies. Sensitivity analyses will be performed on efficacy outcomes. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) will be utilized to appraise the overall quality of evidence.
Discussion: This review will encompass both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies, thereby enabling us to synthesize and assess evidence across experimental and real-world observational settings. Our findings will contribute to a better understanding on the benefit-risk profile regarding the off-label use of SC/VB6 in oncology, guiding the trajectory of future research, and offering a robust scientific foundation to inform clinical and regulatory decision-making process.
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.