血液透析患者瞬时弹性图测量肝脏硬度的动态变化。

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology Forum Pub Date : 2025-02-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.14744/hf.2024.2024.0044
Nottawan Suksai, Somchai Yongsiri, Raweewan Witoon, Rachaneeporn Chueansuwan, Anothai Juttuporn
{"title":"血液透析患者瞬时弹性图测量肝脏硬度的动态变化。","authors":"Nottawan Suksai, Somchai Yongsiri, Raweewan Witoon, Rachaneeporn Chueansuwan, Anothai Juttuporn","doi":"10.14744/hf.2024.2024.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The impact of fluid status changes on liver stiffness measurements (LSM) using transient elastography (TE) in dialysis patients remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate LSM variations during hemodialysis (HD) and analyze contributing factors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on dialysis patients at a tertiary care hospital. TE and bioelectrical impedance analysis were performed at four time points: before dialysis, immediately after, the first day after, and the second day after dialysis. LSM values were compared across these time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients were enrolled, with two cases showing consistently extremely elevated LSM values exceeding 20 kPa, considered outliers. The mean LSM values were 7.6±7.0 kPa before dialysis, 6.12±2.94 kPa immediately after, 6.64±5.27 kPa on the first day, and 6.94±5.12 kPa on the second day after dialysis. The mean pre-HD LSM was significantly higher than immediately after and on the first day after dialysis, with mean differences of 1.54 kPa (95% CI 0.22-2.86, p=0.02) and 1.02 kPa (95% CI 0.15-1.9, p=0.02), respectively. The ultrafiltration volume positively correlated with the LSM difference pre- and post-HD (r=0.315, p=0.008). Patients with residual fluid overload had significantly higher post-HD LSM compared to euvolemic patients (p=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LSM values significantly decreased after dialysis and remained lower for up to 24 hours. Transient elastography should preferably be performed within 24 hours post-dialysis when the patient is in a euvolemic state.</p>","PeriodicalId":29722,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Forum","volume":"6 2","pages":"57-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic changes in liver stiffness measurements using transient elastography in hemodialysis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Nottawan Suksai, Somchai Yongsiri, Raweewan Witoon, Rachaneeporn Chueansuwan, Anothai Juttuporn\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/hf.2024.2024.0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The impact of fluid status changes on liver stiffness measurements (LSM) using transient elastography (TE) in dialysis patients remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate LSM variations during hemodialysis (HD) and analyze contributing factors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on dialysis patients at a tertiary care hospital. TE and bioelectrical impedance analysis were performed at four time points: before dialysis, immediately after, the first day after, and the second day after dialysis. LSM values were compared across these time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients were enrolled, with two cases showing consistently extremely elevated LSM values exceeding 20 kPa, considered outliers. The mean LSM values were 7.6±7.0 kPa before dialysis, 6.12±2.94 kPa immediately after, 6.64±5.27 kPa on the first day, and 6.94±5.12 kPa on the second day after dialysis. The mean pre-HD LSM was significantly higher than immediately after and on the first day after dialysis, with mean differences of 1.54 kPa (95% CI 0.22-2.86, p=0.02) and 1.02 kPa (95% CI 0.15-1.9, p=0.02), respectively. The ultrafiltration volume positively correlated with the LSM difference pre- and post-HD (r=0.315, p=0.008). Patients with residual fluid overload had significantly higher post-HD LSM compared to euvolemic patients (p=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LSM values significantly decreased after dialysis and remained lower for up to 24 hours. Transient elastography should preferably be performed within 24 hours post-dialysis when the patient is in a euvolemic state.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology Forum\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"57-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999895/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/hf.2024.2024.0044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/hf.2024.2024.0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:液体状态变化对透析患者肝刚度测量(LSM)的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估血液透析(HD)期间LSM的变化并分析其影响因素。材料与方法:对某三级医院透析患者进行横断面研究。在透析前、透析后立即、透析后第1天、透析后第2天四个时间点进行TE和生物电阻抗分析。在这些时间点上比较LSM值。结果:70例患者入组,其中2例LSM值持续升高,超过20 kPa,被认为是异常值。透析前平均LSM值为7.6±7.0 kPa,透析后立即为6.12±2.94 kPa,透析第一天为6.64±5.27 kPa,透析第二天为6.94±5.12 kPa。透析后第1天和透析后第1天hd前LSM的平均差异均显著高于透析后即刻和第1天,分别为1.54 kPa (95% CI 0.22-2.86, p=0.02)和1.02 kPa (95% CI 0.15-1.9, p=0.02)。超滤体积与hd前后LSM差异呈正相关(r=0.315, p=0.008)。残液超载患者的hd后LSM明显高于残液血症患者(p=0.003)。结论:LSM值在透析后明显降低,并在24小时内保持较低水平。瞬时弹性成像最好在透析后24小时内进行,此时患者处于血液充血状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic changes in liver stiffness measurements using transient elastography in hemodialysis patients.

Background and aim: The impact of fluid status changes on liver stiffness measurements (LSM) using transient elastography (TE) in dialysis patients remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate LSM variations during hemodialysis (HD) and analyze contributing factors.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on dialysis patients at a tertiary care hospital. TE and bioelectrical impedance analysis were performed at four time points: before dialysis, immediately after, the first day after, and the second day after dialysis. LSM values were compared across these time points.

Results: Seventy patients were enrolled, with two cases showing consistently extremely elevated LSM values exceeding 20 kPa, considered outliers. The mean LSM values were 7.6±7.0 kPa before dialysis, 6.12±2.94 kPa immediately after, 6.64±5.27 kPa on the first day, and 6.94±5.12 kPa on the second day after dialysis. The mean pre-HD LSM was significantly higher than immediately after and on the first day after dialysis, with mean differences of 1.54 kPa (95% CI 0.22-2.86, p=0.02) and 1.02 kPa (95% CI 0.15-1.9, p=0.02), respectively. The ultrafiltration volume positively correlated with the LSM difference pre- and post-HD (r=0.315, p=0.008). Patients with residual fluid overload had significantly higher post-HD LSM compared to euvolemic patients (p=0.003).

Conclusion: LSM values significantly decreased after dialysis and remained lower for up to 24 hours. Transient elastography should preferably be performed within 24 hours post-dialysis when the patient is in a euvolemic state.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信