语音材料和评分方法对人工耳蜗使用者和正常听力听者心理测量曲线的影响。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Hendrik Christiaan Stronks, Robin van Deurzen, Paula Louisa Jansen, Jeroen Johannes Briaire, Johan Hubertus Maria Frijns
{"title":"语音材料和评分方法对人工耳蜗使用者和正常听力听者心理测量曲线的影响。","authors":"Hendrik Christiaan Stronks, Robin van Deurzen, Paula Louisa Jansen, Jeroen Johannes Briaire, Johan Hubertus Maria Frijns","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cochlear implants (CIs) are the primary treatment for severe-to-profound hearing loss. For CI users, speech intelligibility (SI) is often excellent in quiet yet degrades dramatically in background noise. Scientific and clinical testing of the effects of noise on SI is routinely performed with speech-in-noise tests. The sensitivity of these tests to signal to noise ratio depends on the slope of their psychometric curve. This slope is not always known for CI users, and direct comparisons between typical hearing (TH) listeners and CI users are lacking.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We present a comparative study of a digit test (DIN), a Matrix sentence test, and an everyday sentence test (LIST) for a group of CI users and TH listeners, with use of word (digit) and sentence (triplet) scoring in the free field. We report descriptive statistics and effect size measures of the psychometric slope and the speech reception threshold (SRT) for each speech test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For CI users, the slopes of the psychometric curve were significantly shallower and SRTs significantly higher than those of TH listeners. The shallowest slope was seen with the Matrix test. However, the small variances of the slope and the SRT resulted in effect size estimates that fell between those of the other two tests. The DIN test was associated with steeply sloped psychometric curves with low variance. The scoring method did not substantially affect slopes and SRTs for the DIN test and LIST sentences, but word scoring resulted in shallow slopes and substantially worse SRTs for CI users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DIN test stood out in this study as an attractive speech-in-noise test for CI users, with steep slopes and low variance in slopes and SRTs among participants. Digit and keyword scoring appear to be viable options for the DIN test and LIST sentences, respectively, potentially increasing the number of available test items. For the Matrix test, sentence scoring yielded shallow slopes and deteriorated SI, especially for the CI group. We recommend word scoring for the Dutch-Flemish Matrix test.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Speech Material and Scoring Method on Psychometric Curves for Cochlear Implant Users and Typical Hearing Listeners.\",\"authors\":\"Hendrik Christiaan Stronks, Robin van Deurzen, Paula Louisa Jansen, Jeroen Johannes Briaire, Johan Hubertus Maria Frijns\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cochlear implants (CIs) are the primary treatment for severe-to-profound hearing loss. For CI users, speech intelligibility (SI) is often excellent in quiet yet degrades dramatically in background noise. Scientific and clinical testing of the effects of noise on SI is routinely performed with speech-in-noise tests. The sensitivity of these tests to signal to noise ratio depends on the slope of their psychometric curve. This slope is not always known for CI users, and direct comparisons between typical hearing (TH) listeners and CI users are lacking.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We present a comparative study of a digit test (DIN), a Matrix sentence test, and an everyday sentence test (LIST) for a group of CI users and TH listeners, with use of word (digit) and sentence (triplet) scoring in the free field. We report descriptive statistics and effect size measures of the psychometric slope and the speech reception threshold (SRT) for each speech test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For CI users, the slopes of the psychometric curve were significantly shallower and SRTs significantly higher than those of TH listeners. The shallowest slope was seen with the Matrix test. However, the small variances of the slope and the SRT resulted in effect size estimates that fell between those of the other two tests. The DIN test was associated with steeply sloped psychometric curves with low variance. The scoring method did not substantially affect slopes and SRTs for the DIN test and LIST sentences, but word scoring resulted in shallow slopes and substantially worse SRTs for CI users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DIN test stood out in this study as an attractive speech-in-noise test for CI users, with steep slopes and low variance in slopes and SRTs among participants. Digit and keyword scoring appear to be viable options for the DIN test and LIST sentences, respectively, potentially increasing the number of available test items. For the Matrix test, sentence scoring yielded shallow slopes and deteriorated SI, especially for the CI group. We recommend word scoring for the Dutch-Flemish Matrix test.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ear and Hearing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ear and Hearing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001672\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001672","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人工耳蜗(CIs)是重度至重度听力损失的主要治疗方法。对于CI用户来说,语音清晰度(SI)在安静环境下通常很好,但在背景噪声下却会急剧下降。科学和临床测试噪音对SI的影响通常是通过噪音中的语音测试进行的。这些测试对信噪比的敏感性取决于其心理测量曲线的斜率。CI用户并不总是知道这个斜率,并且缺乏典型听力(TH)听众和CI用户之间的直接比较。设计:我们对一组CI用户和TH听众进行了数字测试(DIN)、矩阵句子测试和日常句子测试(LIST)的比较研究,在自由字段中使用单词(数字)和句子(三连音)评分。我们报告了每个语音测试的心理测量斜率和语音接收阈值(SRT)的描述性统计和效应量测量。结果:CI使用者的心理测量曲线斜率显著低于TH听者,srt显著高于TH听者。用矩阵检验可以看到最浅的斜率。然而,斜率和SRT的小方差导致效应大小估计值落在其他两个检验之间。DIN测试与低方差的陡坡心理测量曲线相关。评分方法对DIN测试和LIST句子的斜率和srt没有实质影响,但单词评分导致CI用户的斜率较浅,srt明显较差。结论:在本研究中,DIN测试对于CI用户来说是一个有吸引力的噪声中语音测试,其斜率较大,参与者之间的斜率和srt方差较小。数字和关键字评分似乎分别是DIN测试和LIST句子的可行选择,可能会增加可用测试项目的数量。对于矩阵测试,句子评分产生浅斜坡和恶化的SI,特别是对于CI组。我们建议在荷兰语-佛兰德语矩阵测试中进行单词评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Speech Material and Scoring Method on Psychometric Curves for Cochlear Implant Users and Typical Hearing Listeners.

Objectives: Cochlear implants (CIs) are the primary treatment for severe-to-profound hearing loss. For CI users, speech intelligibility (SI) is often excellent in quiet yet degrades dramatically in background noise. Scientific and clinical testing of the effects of noise on SI is routinely performed with speech-in-noise tests. The sensitivity of these tests to signal to noise ratio depends on the slope of their psychometric curve. This slope is not always known for CI users, and direct comparisons between typical hearing (TH) listeners and CI users are lacking.

Design: We present a comparative study of a digit test (DIN), a Matrix sentence test, and an everyday sentence test (LIST) for a group of CI users and TH listeners, with use of word (digit) and sentence (triplet) scoring in the free field. We report descriptive statistics and effect size measures of the psychometric slope and the speech reception threshold (SRT) for each speech test.

Results: For CI users, the slopes of the psychometric curve were significantly shallower and SRTs significantly higher than those of TH listeners. The shallowest slope was seen with the Matrix test. However, the small variances of the slope and the SRT resulted in effect size estimates that fell between those of the other two tests. The DIN test was associated with steeply sloped psychometric curves with low variance. The scoring method did not substantially affect slopes and SRTs for the DIN test and LIST sentences, but word scoring resulted in shallow slopes and substantially worse SRTs for CI users.

Conclusions: The DIN test stood out in this study as an attractive speech-in-noise test for CI users, with steep slopes and low variance in slopes and SRTs among participants. Digit and keyword scoring appear to be viable options for the DIN test and LIST sentences, respectively, potentially increasing the number of available test items. For the Matrix test, sentence scoring yielded shallow slopes and deteriorated SI, especially for the CI group. We recommend word scoring for the Dutch-Flemish Matrix test.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ear and Hearing
Ear and Hearing 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From the basic science of hearing and balance disorders to auditory electrophysiology to amplification and the psychological factors of hearing loss, Ear and Hearing covers all aspects of auditory and vestibular disorders. This multidisciplinary journal consolidates the various factors that contribute to identification, remediation, and audiologic and vestibular rehabilitation. It is the one journal that serves the diverse interest of all members of this professional community -- otologists, audiologists, educators, and to those involved in the design, manufacture, and distribution of amplification systems. The original articles published in the journal focus on assessment, diagnosis, and management of auditory and vestibular disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信