没有证据表明股四头肌或腘绳肌有活动运动诱发电位迟滞。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Adam Gardi, Kazandra M Rodriguez, Thomas E Augenstein, Riann M Palmieri-Smith, Chandramouli Krishnan
{"title":"没有证据表明股四头肌或腘绳肌有活动运动诱发电位迟滞。","authors":"Adam Gardi, Kazandra M Rodriguez, Thomas E Augenstein, Riann M Palmieri-Smith, Chandramouli Krishnan","doi":"10.1177/09226028251330850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe excitability of the corticospinal tract (<i>i.e.,</i> corticospinal excitability) is a valuable tool for assessing neurophysiology and the effectiveness of interventions in individuals with and without neurological and/or orthopaedic injuries. Corticospinal excitability is often measured with an input-output recruitment curve, which is produced by stimulating the motor cortex via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at several intensities and measuring the changes in the evoked responses. However, it is currently unclear if hysteresis in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) (<i>i.e.,</i> changes in MEP amplitude due to the order of stimulus intensities) affects the resulting measure of excitability, particularly in lower extremity muscles.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether the order of stimulus intensity (ascending, descending, randomized) affects input-output recruitment curves measured in the lower extremity muscles.MethodsRecruitment curves were produced in neurologically intact individuals by stimulating the primary motor cortex at 70% to 140% of active motor threshold in 10% increments. We examined three stimulus intensity ordering paradigms: ascending (70<math><mo>→</mo></math>140), descending (140<math><mo>→</mo></math>70), and randomized. We measured MEPs of the quadriceps and the antagonistic hamstring muscles using surface electromyography in addition to quadriceps motor evoked torque. We computed the area under the recruitment curve (AUC) of the raw and normalized motor evoked responses and used classical and Bayesian inference methods to comprehensively evaluate hysteresis in MEPs.ResultsClassical hypothesis testing revealed no significant main effects of stimulus order. Bayesian analyses also confirmed that the null model was more favored than the main effects model.ConclusionsCorticospinal excitability of the quadriceps and antagonistic hamstring muscles were not influenced by stimulus intensity order. Any of the three approaches (ascending, descending, randomized) may be used when measuring recruitment curves for the quadriceps and hamstring muscles.</p>","PeriodicalId":21130,"journal":{"name":"Restorative neurology and neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"9226028251330850"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Evidence of Hysteresis in Quadriceps or Hamstring Active Motor Evoked Potentials.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Gardi, Kazandra M Rodriguez, Thomas E Augenstein, Riann M Palmieri-Smith, Chandramouli Krishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09226028251330850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThe excitability of the corticospinal tract (<i>i.e.,</i> corticospinal excitability) is a valuable tool for assessing neurophysiology and the effectiveness of interventions in individuals with and without neurological and/or orthopaedic injuries. Corticospinal excitability is often measured with an input-output recruitment curve, which is produced by stimulating the motor cortex via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at several intensities and measuring the changes in the evoked responses. However, it is currently unclear if hysteresis in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) (<i>i.e.,</i> changes in MEP amplitude due to the order of stimulus intensities) affects the resulting measure of excitability, particularly in lower extremity muscles.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether the order of stimulus intensity (ascending, descending, randomized) affects input-output recruitment curves measured in the lower extremity muscles.MethodsRecruitment curves were produced in neurologically intact individuals by stimulating the primary motor cortex at 70% to 140% of active motor threshold in 10% increments. We examined three stimulus intensity ordering paradigms: ascending (70<math><mo>→</mo></math>140), descending (140<math><mo>→</mo></math>70), and randomized. We measured MEPs of the quadriceps and the antagonistic hamstring muscles using surface electromyography in addition to quadriceps motor evoked torque. We computed the area under the recruitment curve (AUC) of the raw and normalized motor evoked responses and used classical and Bayesian inference methods to comprehensively evaluate hysteresis in MEPs.ResultsClassical hypothesis testing revealed no significant main effects of stimulus order. Bayesian analyses also confirmed that the null model was more favored than the main effects model.ConclusionsCorticospinal excitability of the quadriceps and antagonistic hamstring muscles were not influenced by stimulus intensity order. Any of the three approaches (ascending, descending, randomized) may be used when measuring recruitment curves for the quadriceps and hamstring muscles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Restorative neurology and neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9226028251330850\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Restorative neurology and neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09226028251330850\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative neurology and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09226028251330850","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景皮质脊髓束的兴奋性(即皮质脊髓兴奋性)是评估神经生理学和有或无神经和/或骨科损伤个体干预有效性的有价值的工具。皮质脊髓兴奋性通常通过输入-输出招募曲线来测量,该曲线是通过经颅磁刺激(TMS)在几个强度下刺激运动皮层并测量诱发反应的变化而产生的。然而,目前尚不清楚运动诱发电位(MEP)的迟滞(即由于刺激强度顺序而引起的MEP振幅的变化)是否会影响由此产生的兴奋性测量,特别是在下肢肌肉中。目的探讨刺激强度顺序(上升、下降、随机)对下肢肌肉输入-输出再招募曲线的影响。方法以70% ~ 140%的运动阈值,以10%的增量刺激初级运动皮层,在神经功能完整的个体中产生招募曲线。我们研究了三种刺激强度排序范式:上升(70→140)、下降(140→70)和随机化。除了四头肌运动诱发扭矩外,我们还使用表面肌电图测量了四头肌和对抗性腘绳肌的mep。我们计算了原始和归一化运动诱发反应的招募曲线下面积(AUC),并采用经典和贝叶斯推理方法综合评价了mep的迟滞性。结果经经典假设检验,刺激顺序的主效应不显著。贝叶斯分析也证实了零模型比主效应模型更受青睐。结论股四头肌和对抗性腘绳肌皮质脊髓兴奋性不受刺激强度顺序的影响。在测量股四头肌和腘绳肌的恢复曲线时,可以使用三种方法中的任何一种(上升法、下降法、随机法)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No Evidence of Hysteresis in Quadriceps or Hamstring Active Motor Evoked Potentials.

BackgroundThe excitability of the corticospinal tract (i.e., corticospinal excitability) is a valuable tool for assessing neurophysiology and the effectiveness of interventions in individuals with and without neurological and/or orthopaedic injuries. Corticospinal excitability is often measured with an input-output recruitment curve, which is produced by stimulating the motor cortex via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at several intensities and measuring the changes in the evoked responses. However, it is currently unclear if hysteresis in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) (i.e., changes in MEP amplitude due to the order of stimulus intensities) affects the resulting measure of excitability, particularly in lower extremity muscles.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether the order of stimulus intensity (ascending, descending, randomized) affects input-output recruitment curves measured in the lower extremity muscles.MethodsRecruitment curves were produced in neurologically intact individuals by stimulating the primary motor cortex at 70% to 140% of active motor threshold in 10% increments. We examined three stimulus intensity ordering paradigms: ascending (70140), descending (14070), and randomized. We measured MEPs of the quadriceps and the antagonistic hamstring muscles using surface electromyography in addition to quadriceps motor evoked torque. We computed the area under the recruitment curve (AUC) of the raw and normalized motor evoked responses and used classical and Bayesian inference methods to comprehensively evaluate hysteresis in MEPs.ResultsClassical hypothesis testing revealed no significant main effects of stimulus order. Bayesian analyses also confirmed that the null model was more favored than the main effects model.ConclusionsCorticospinal excitability of the quadriceps and antagonistic hamstring muscles were not influenced by stimulus intensity order. Any of the three approaches (ascending, descending, randomized) may be used when measuring recruitment curves for the quadriceps and hamstring muscles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal publishes papers relating to the plasticity and response of the nervous system to accidental or experimental injuries and their interventions, transplantation, neurodegenerative disorders and experimental strategies to improve regeneration or functional recovery and rehabilitation. Experimental and clinical research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant experimental or clinical relevance and interest to a multidisciplinary audience. Experiments on un-anesthetized animals should conform with the standards for the use of laboratory animals as established by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, US National Academy of Sciences. Experiments in which paralytic agents are used must be justified. Patient identity should be concealed. All manuscripts are sent out for blind peer review to editorial board members or outside reviewers. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience is a member of Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信