美丽意味着什么?探索人工智能驱动的美容评估的局限性。

Q2 Medicine
Emmaline Ashley, Lee Walker, Priyanka Chadha
{"title":"美丽意味着什么?探索人工智能驱动的美容评估的局限性。","authors":"Emmaline Ashley, Lee Walker, Priyanka Chadha","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines the multifaceted nature of beauty, encompassing evolutionary, biological, neurological, cultural, and individual factors. It explores the limitations of objective assessments, such as artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms like the Facial Aesthetic Index and Facial Youthfulness Index, which often fail to capture the diversity of individual preferences and cultural standards. While AI tools can provide valuable insights into facial features, their use in aesthetic medicine should be approached with caution, recognizing the importance of subjective perceptions. We emphasize the need for a collaborative approach that integrates AI insights with clinical expertise and patient involvement to achieve personalized and satisfying outcomes in aesthetic medicine. Ultimately, beauty is a complex and subjective experience that cannot be fully defined or assessed objectively, and successful aesthetic interventions require a holistic approach that values both objective data and individual perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":53616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","volume":"18 4","pages":"24-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12007659/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Does it Mean to Be Beautiful? Exploring the Limits of AI-Driven Beauty Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Emmaline Ashley, Lee Walker, Priyanka Chadha\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper examines the multifaceted nature of beauty, encompassing evolutionary, biological, neurological, cultural, and individual factors. It explores the limitations of objective assessments, such as artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms like the Facial Aesthetic Index and Facial Youthfulness Index, which often fail to capture the diversity of individual preferences and cultural standards. While AI tools can provide valuable insights into facial features, their use in aesthetic medicine should be approached with caution, recognizing the importance of subjective perceptions. We emphasize the need for a collaborative approach that integrates AI insights with clinical expertise and patient involvement to achieve personalized and satisfying outcomes in aesthetic medicine. Ultimately, beauty is a complex and subjective experience that cannot be fully defined or assessed objectively, and successful aesthetic interventions require a holistic approach that values both objective data and individual perspectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"24-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12007659/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了美的多面性,包括进化、生物、神经、文化和个人因素。它探讨了客观评估的局限性,例如面部美学指数和面部青春指数等人工智能(AI)算法,这些算法往往无法捕捉到个人偏好和文化标准的多样性。虽然人工智能工具可以提供有关面部特征的有价值的见解,但在美容医学中使用它们应该谨慎对待,认识到主观感知的重要性。我们强调需要一种协作方法,将人工智能的见解与临床专业知识和患者参与相结合,以实现个性化和令人满意的美容医学结果。最终,美是一种复杂的主观体验,无法被客观地完全定义或评估,成功的美学干预需要一种既重视客观数据又重视个人观点的整体方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Does it Mean to Be Beautiful? Exploring the Limits of AI-Driven Beauty Assessment.

This paper examines the multifaceted nature of beauty, encompassing evolutionary, biological, neurological, cultural, and individual factors. It explores the limitations of objective assessments, such as artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms like the Facial Aesthetic Index and Facial Youthfulness Index, which often fail to capture the diversity of individual preferences and cultural standards. While AI tools can provide valuable insights into facial features, their use in aesthetic medicine should be approached with caution, recognizing the importance of subjective perceptions. We emphasize the need for a collaborative approach that integrates AI insights with clinical expertise and patient involvement to achieve personalized and satisfying outcomes in aesthetic medicine. Ultimately, beauty is a complex and subjective experience that cannot be fully defined or assessed objectively, and successful aesthetic interventions require a holistic approach that values both objective data and individual perspectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信