Zihao Song, Xin Su, Yuxiang Fan, Chengbin Yang, Tianqi Tu, Huishen Pang, Huiwei Liu, Jinhui Yu, Ming Ye, Peng Zhang, Yongjie Ma, Hongqi Zhang
{"title":"颅内及颅颈交界处硬脑膜动静脉瘘伴脊髓髓周引流罕见且易误诊。","authors":"Zihao Song, Xin Su, Yuxiang Fan, Chengbin Yang, Tianqi Tu, Huishen Pang, Huiwei Liu, Jinhui Yu, Ming Ye, Peng Zhang, Yongjie Ma, Hongqi Zhang","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Intracranial and craniocervical junction dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) with spinal perimedullary drainage are rare, and large cohort studies are lacking. The aim of this study was to describe clinical characteristics and angioarchitecture of these DAVFs, share our treatment experience, and identify risk factors associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage and poor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 158 consecutive patients treated at our neurosurgical center were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were grouped according to lesion location, and their baseline clinical characteristics, angioarchitecture, treatment strategies, and outcomes were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients' mean age was 53.4 years. Most patients were male with 141 patients (89.2%). The most common clinical manifestation was nonhemorrhagic neurological deficits (71.5%), followed by subarachnoid hemorrhage (28.5%). Microsurgery was the most common treatment strategy applied for 112 patients (70.9%), 34 patients (21.5%) were treated with interventional embolization only, and 12 (7.6%) received both interventional embolization and microsurgery. At the last follow-up, there were 122 patients (77.2%) with favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale <3). Clinical manifestation of numbness (odds ratio [OR] 4.098, 95% CI 1.491-11.263, P = .006), clinical manifestation of urinary dysfunction (OR 3.991, 95% CI 1.378-11.558, P = .011), and pretreatment modified Rankin Scale ≥3 (OR 19.523, 95% CI 5.066-75.242, P < .001) were significantly associated with poor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intracranial and craniocervical junction DAVFs with spinal perimedullary drainage are indeed rare. Specific sign on magnetic resonance imaging is beneficial for accurate diagnosis. The choice between microsurgery or interventional embolization is primarily based on lesion location and angioarchitecture. Early diagnosis, prevention of misdiagnosis, and appropriate treatment are crucial for improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54254,"journal":{"name":"Operative Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rare and Easily Misdiagnosed Intracranial and Craniocervical Junction Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas With Spinal Perimedullary Drainage.\",\"authors\":\"Zihao Song, Xin Su, Yuxiang Fan, Chengbin Yang, Tianqi Tu, Huishen Pang, Huiwei Liu, Jinhui Yu, Ming Ye, Peng Zhang, Yongjie Ma, Hongqi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/ons.0000000000001619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Intracranial and craniocervical junction dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) with spinal perimedullary drainage are rare, and large cohort studies are lacking. The aim of this study was to describe clinical characteristics and angioarchitecture of these DAVFs, share our treatment experience, and identify risk factors associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage and poor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 158 consecutive patients treated at our neurosurgical center were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were grouped according to lesion location, and their baseline clinical characteristics, angioarchitecture, treatment strategies, and outcomes were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients' mean age was 53.4 years. Most patients were male with 141 patients (89.2%). The most common clinical manifestation was nonhemorrhagic neurological deficits (71.5%), followed by subarachnoid hemorrhage (28.5%). Microsurgery was the most common treatment strategy applied for 112 patients (70.9%), 34 patients (21.5%) were treated with interventional embolization only, and 12 (7.6%) received both interventional embolization and microsurgery. At the last follow-up, there were 122 patients (77.2%) with favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale <3). Clinical manifestation of numbness (odds ratio [OR] 4.098, 95% CI 1.491-11.263, P = .006), clinical manifestation of urinary dysfunction (OR 3.991, 95% CI 1.378-11.558, P = .011), and pretreatment modified Rankin Scale ≥3 (OR 19.523, 95% CI 5.066-75.242, P < .001) were significantly associated with poor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intracranial and craniocervical junction DAVFs with spinal perimedullary drainage are indeed rare. Specific sign on magnetic resonance imaging is beneficial for accurate diagnosis. The choice between microsurgery or interventional embolization is primarily based on lesion location and angioarchitecture. Early diagnosis, prevention of misdiagnosis, and appropriate treatment are crucial for improved outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001619\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001619","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rare and Easily Misdiagnosed Intracranial and Craniocervical Junction Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas With Spinal Perimedullary Drainage.
Background and objectives: Intracranial and craniocervical junction dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) with spinal perimedullary drainage are rare, and large cohort studies are lacking. The aim of this study was to describe clinical characteristics and angioarchitecture of these DAVFs, share our treatment experience, and identify risk factors associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage and poor outcomes.
Methods: A total of 158 consecutive patients treated at our neurosurgical center were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were grouped according to lesion location, and their baseline clinical characteristics, angioarchitecture, treatment strategies, and outcomes were summarized.
Results: The patients' mean age was 53.4 years. Most patients were male with 141 patients (89.2%). The most common clinical manifestation was nonhemorrhagic neurological deficits (71.5%), followed by subarachnoid hemorrhage (28.5%). Microsurgery was the most common treatment strategy applied for 112 patients (70.9%), 34 patients (21.5%) were treated with interventional embolization only, and 12 (7.6%) received both interventional embolization and microsurgery. At the last follow-up, there were 122 patients (77.2%) with favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale <3). Clinical manifestation of numbness (odds ratio [OR] 4.098, 95% CI 1.491-11.263, P = .006), clinical manifestation of urinary dysfunction (OR 3.991, 95% CI 1.378-11.558, P = .011), and pretreatment modified Rankin Scale ≥3 (OR 19.523, 95% CI 5.066-75.242, P < .001) were significantly associated with poor outcomes.
Conclusion: Intracranial and craniocervical junction DAVFs with spinal perimedullary drainage are indeed rare. Specific sign on magnetic resonance imaging is beneficial for accurate diagnosis. The choice between microsurgery or interventional embolization is primarily based on lesion location and angioarchitecture. Early diagnosis, prevention of misdiagnosis, and appropriate treatment are crucial for improved outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Operative Neurosurgery is a bi-monthly, unique publication focusing exclusively on surgical technique and devices, providing practical, skill-enhancing guidance to its readers. Complementing the clinical and research studies published in Neurosurgery, Operative Neurosurgery brings the reader technical material that highlights operative procedures, anatomy, instrumentation, devices, and technology. Operative Neurosurgery is the practical resource for cutting-edge material that brings the surgeon the most up to date literature on operative practice and technique