{"title":"分散前和分散后近交抑制解耦时混合交配系统下最优种子大小。","authors":"Qiaoqiao Huang","doi":"10.1086/735011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractInbreeding depression (ID) has different components, and how these affect selection on seed size is currently unknown. Using an optimality model, I find that when pollen limitation selects for mixed mating systems, increased predispersal ID (abortion of selfed ovules) increases the optimal sizes of both selfed and outcrossed seeds, whereas increased seed size-independent postdispersal ID (reduced survival of selfed seeds) only increases the size of outcrossed seeds. The effect of decreased efficiency of maternal investment in selfed seeds depends on details of the model assumptions, but in many cases it will increase resource allocation to both types of seeds. If seed size-independent postdispersal ID is less than 0.5, predispersal ID will select for selfed seeds receiving more maternal investment than outcrossed seeds. The same is true for decreased efficiency of maternal investment. If decreased efficiency of maternal investment leads to a reduction in selfed seed size, selfed seeds may end up being smaller than outcrossed seeds. The model highlights the complex roles ID plays in determining seed size and indicates that empirical measurement of postdispersal ID may underestimate its extent. Tests of the model may help us understand whether plants can adaptively allocate resources differentially between selfed and outcrossed seeds.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"205 5","pages":"516-527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Seed Size under Mixed Mating Systems When Predispersal and Postdispersal Inbreeding Depression Is Decoupled.\",\"authors\":\"Qiaoqiao Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/735011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AbstractInbreeding depression (ID) has different components, and how these affect selection on seed size is currently unknown. Using an optimality model, I find that when pollen limitation selects for mixed mating systems, increased predispersal ID (abortion of selfed ovules) increases the optimal sizes of both selfed and outcrossed seeds, whereas increased seed size-independent postdispersal ID (reduced survival of selfed seeds) only increases the size of outcrossed seeds. The effect of decreased efficiency of maternal investment in selfed seeds depends on details of the model assumptions, but in many cases it will increase resource allocation to both types of seeds. If seed size-independent postdispersal ID is less than 0.5, predispersal ID will select for selfed seeds receiving more maternal investment than outcrossed seeds. The same is true for decreased efficiency of maternal investment. If decreased efficiency of maternal investment leads to a reduction in selfed seed size, selfed seeds may end up being smaller than outcrossed seeds. The model highlights the complex roles ID plays in determining seed size and indicates that empirical measurement of postdispersal ID may underestimate its extent. Tests of the model may help us understand whether plants can adaptively allocate resources differentially between selfed and outcrossed seeds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Naturalist\",\"volume\":\"205 5\",\"pages\":\"516-527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Naturalist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/735011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/735011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimal Seed Size under Mixed Mating Systems When Predispersal and Postdispersal Inbreeding Depression Is Decoupled.
AbstractInbreeding depression (ID) has different components, and how these affect selection on seed size is currently unknown. Using an optimality model, I find that when pollen limitation selects for mixed mating systems, increased predispersal ID (abortion of selfed ovules) increases the optimal sizes of both selfed and outcrossed seeds, whereas increased seed size-independent postdispersal ID (reduced survival of selfed seeds) only increases the size of outcrossed seeds. The effect of decreased efficiency of maternal investment in selfed seeds depends on details of the model assumptions, but in many cases it will increase resource allocation to both types of seeds. If seed size-independent postdispersal ID is less than 0.5, predispersal ID will select for selfed seeds receiving more maternal investment than outcrossed seeds. The same is true for decreased efficiency of maternal investment. If decreased efficiency of maternal investment leads to a reduction in selfed seed size, selfed seeds may end up being smaller than outcrossed seeds. The model highlights the complex roles ID plays in determining seed size and indicates that empirical measurement of postdispersal ID may underestimate its extent. Tests of the model may help us understand whether plants can adaptively allocate resources differentially between selfed and outcrossed seeds.
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.