成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT)在研究中的使用:一项国际范围审查。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Quality of Life Research Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1007/s11136-025-03958-3
Stacey Rand, Nick Smith, Elizabeth Welch, Stephen Allan, James Caiels, Ann-Marie Towers
{"title":"成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT)在研究中的使用:一项国际范围审查。","authors":"Stacey Rand, Nick Smith, Elizabeth Welch, Stephen Allan, James Caiels, Ann-Marie Towers","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-03958-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Since the launch of Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) in 2012, there has been increasing interest in use of ASCOT measures in social care research and evaluation, internationally. This scoping review seeks to understand ASCOT use and the methodologies within which the measures have been applied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international scoping review of studies published between January 2012 and July 2024 that utilized ASCOT, excluding measure development and psychometric studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five articles (11 protocols) reported use of ASCOT. Most reported cross-sectional studies (n = 19) or randomized controlled trials (n = 15) that explored the effectiveness of policy, interventions or systems. ASCOT measures were also applied in mixed methods and other study designs, including qualitative studies. A few studies applied ASCOT to develop theory or conceptual frameworks that relate to care, including how to understand unmet need.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASCOT measures have been applied, internationally, in a range of ways, with a focus on evaluation studies. Further research is required to explore how ASCOT is used in practice, including care planning. Focus is also needed on ensuring users select the appropriate measure for their study, and widen awareness of adapted versions to support data collection, like ASCOT easy read (ASCOT-ER).</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":"2437-2450"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) in research studies: an international scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Stacey Rand, Nick Smith, Elizabeth Welch, Stephen Allan, James Caiels, Ann-Marie Towers\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11136-025-03958-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Since the launch of Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) in 2012, there has been increasing interest in use of ASCOT measures in social care research and evaluation, internationally. This scoping review seeks to understand ASCOT use and the methodologies within which the measures have been applied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international scoping review of studies published between January 2012 and July 2024 that utilized ASCOT, excluding measure development and psychometric studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five articles (11 protocols) reported use of ASCOT. Most reported cross-sectional studies (n = 19) or randomized controlled trials (n = 15) that explored the effectiveness of policy, interventions or systems. ASCOT measures were also applied in mixed methods and other study designs, including qualitative studies. A few studies applied ASCOT to develop theory or conceptual frameworks that relate to care, including how to understand unmet need.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASCOT measures have been applied, internationally, in a range of ways, with a focus on evaluation studies. Further research is required to explore how ASCOT is used in practice, including care planning. Focus is also needed on ensuring users select the appropriate measure for their study, and widen awareness of adapted versions to support data collection, like ASCOT easy read (ASCOT-ER).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2437-2450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12432070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-03958-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-03958-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自2012年推出成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT)以来,国际上对在社会护理研究和评估中使用ASCOT措施的兴趣越来越大。此范围审查旨在了解ASCOT的使用情况以及应用这些措施的方法。方法:对2012年1月至2024年7月期间发表的使用ASCOT的研究进行国际范围综述,不包括测量发展和心理测量研究。结果:55篇文章(11个方案)报道了ASCOT的使用。大多数报告的横断面研究(n = 19)或随机对照试验(n = 15)探讨了政策、干预措施或系统的有效性。ASCOT测量也应用于混合方法和其他研究设计,包括定性研究。一些研究应用ASCOT来发展与护理相关的理论或概念框架,包括如何理解未满足的需求。结论:ASCOT措施已在国际上以多种方式应用,重点是评估研究。需要进一步的研究来探索如何在实践中使用ASCOT,包括护理计划。还需要重点确保用户为他们的研究选择适当的衡量标准,并扩大对适应版本的认识,以支持数据收集,如ASCOT易读(ASCOT- er)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Use of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) in research studies: an international scoping review.

Use of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) in research studies: an international scoping review.

Purpose: Since the launch of Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) in 2012, there has been increasing interest in use of ASCOT measures in social care research and evaluation, internationally. This scoping review seeks to understand ASCOT use and the methodologies within which the measures have been applied.

Methods: An international scoping review of studies published between January 2012 and July 2024 that utilized ASCOT, excluding measure development and psychometric studies.

Results: Fifty-five articles (11 protocols) reported use of ASCOT. Most reported cross-sectional studies (n = 19) or randomized controlled trials (n = 15) that explored the effectiveness of policy, interventions or systems. ASCOT measures were also applied in mixed methods and other study designs, including qualitative studies. A few studies applied ASCOT to develop theory or conceptual frameworks that relate to care, including how to understand unmet need.

Conclusion: ASCOT measures have been applied, internationally, in a range of ways, with a focus on evaluation studies. Further research is required to explore how ASCOT is used in practice, including care planning. Focus is also needed on ensuring users select the appropriate measure for their study, and widen awareness of adapted versions to support data collection, like ASCOT easy read (ASCOT-ER).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信