腰椎融合术后限制与自由活动的比较。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-06-15 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005118
Rajkishen Narayanan, Alec Kellish, Teeto Ezeonu, Yunsoo A Lee, Jessica Carroll, Timothy Hagan, Emma Hammelef, Eric Teichner, Jose A Canseco, Ian David Kaye, Mark F Kurd, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder
{"title":"腰椎融合术后限制与自由活动的比较。","authors":"Rajkishen Narayanan, Alec Kellish, Teeto Ezeonu, Yunsoo A Lee, Jessica Carroll, Timothy Hagan, Emma Hammelef, Eric Teichner, Jose A Canseco, Ian David Kaye, Mark F Kurd, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to explore the impact of different hospital-based ambulation protocols on mobility and surgical outcomes after lumbar fusion surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Previous research has highlighted the value of early ambulation after surgery; still some hospitals choose to adopt a more conservative ambulation approach due to concern for patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients ≥18 years of age who underwent primary posterior lumbar decompression and fusion (PLDF) surgery at a hospital with restricted ambulation and a hospital with a liberal ambulation protocol within the same health system from 2021 to 2022 were identified and matched based on patient demographic characteristics. Surgical outcomes included inpatient complications, length of stay, readmissions, reoperations, and discharge disposition. Mobility outcomes included Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) daily activity score, post-therapy session pain rating, and gait trial distance from the first inpatient physical therapy session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients within the liberal ambulation protocol cohort had shorter hospital stays ( P <0.001) and were less likely to require reoperation within 1 year of surgery ( P =0.013). Patients within the restricted ambulation protocol were more likely to experience a complication ( P =0.005) and were less likely to be discharged home after surgery ( P =0.020). Patients at the liberal ambulation hospital had higher AM-PAC basic mobility scores ( P <0.001) and achieved further gait distances ( P <0.001). On multivariable regression analysis, a further gait distance at the first inpatient PT session was a significant predictor of decreased odds of inpatient complications ( P =0.010), decreased length of stay ( P =0.005), and increased odds of discharge to home ( P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liberal ambulation protocols are safe and effective postoperative management strategies after PLDF to decrease inpatient complications, length of stay and discharge to a rehabilitation facility. These findings highlight the role that such protocols can play in helping patients to achieve early mobilization and favorable short-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"809-815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Restricted Versus Liberal Postsurgical Ambulation Protocols on Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Rajkishen Narayanan, Alec Kellish, Teeto Ezeonu, Yunsoo A Lee, Jessica Carroll, Timothy Hagan, Emma Hammelef, Eric Teichner, Jose A Canseco, Ian David Kaye, Mark F Kurd, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to explore the impact of different hospital-based ambulation protocols on mobility and surgical outcomes after lumbar fusion surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Previous research has highlighted the value of early ambulation after surgery; still some hospitals choose to adopt a more conservative ambulation approach due to concern for patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients ≥18 years of age who underwent primary posterior lumbar decompression and fusion (PLDF) surgery at a hospital with restricted ambulation and a hospital with a liberal ambulation protocol within the same health system from 2021 to 2022 were identified and matched based on patient demographic characteristics. Surgical outcomes included inpatient complications, length of stay, readmissions, reoperations, and discharge disposition. Mobility outcomes included Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) daily activity score, post-therapy session pain rating, and gait trial distance from the first inpatient physical therapy session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients within the liberal ambulation protocol cohort had shorter hospital stays ( P <0.001) and were less likely to require reoperation within 1 year of surgery ( P =0.013). Patients within the restricted ambulation protocol were more likely to experience a complication ( P =0.005) and were less likely to be discharged home after surgery ( P =0.020). Patients at the liberal ambulation hospital had higher AM-PAC basic mobility scores ( P <0.001) and achieved further gait distances ( P <0.001). On multivariable regression analysis, a further gait distance at the first inpatient PT session was a significant predictor of decreased odds of inpatient complications ( P =0.010), decreased length of stay ( P =0.005), and increased odds of discharge to home ( P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liberal ambulation protocols are safe and effective postoperative management strategies after PLDF to decrease inpatient complications, length of stay and discharge to a rehabilitation facility. These findings highlight the role that such protocols can play in helping patients to achieve early mobilization and favorable short-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"809-815\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005118\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:本研究的目的是探讨不同医院下床方案对腰椎融合术后活动能力和手术结果的影响。背景资料总结:以往的研究强调了术后早期活动的价值;但仍有一些医院出于对患者安全的考虑,选择采用更为保守的步行方式。方法:根据患者人口统计学特征,对2021-2022年在同一卫生系统内限制活动的医院和自由活动协议的医院接受原发性后路腰椎减压融合(PLDF)手术的≥18岁的成年患者进行识别和匹配。手术结果包括住院并发症、住院时间、再入院、再手术和出院处理。活动能力结果包括急性护理后活动测量(AM-PAC)每日活动评分、治疗后疼痛评分和首次住院物理治疗后的步态试验距离。结果:自由行走方案队列中的患者住院时间较短(p结论:自由行走方案是安全有效的PLDF术后管理策略,可减少住院并发症、住院时间和出院到康复机构。这些发现强调了这些方案在帮助患者实现早期活动和良好的短期预后方面所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Restricted Versus Liberal Postsurgical Ambulation Protocols on Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the impact of different hospital-based ambulation protocols on mobility and surgical outcomes after lumbar fusion surgery.

Summary of background data: Previous research has highlighted the value of early ambulation after surgery; still some hospitals choose to adopt a more conservative ambulation approach due to concern for patient safety.

Methods: Adult patients ≥18 years of age who underwent primary posterior lumbar decompression and fusion (PLDF) surgery at a hospital with restricted ambulation and a hospital with a liberal ambulation protocol within the same health system from 2021 to 2022 were identified and matched based on patient demographic characteristics. Surgical outcomes included inpatient complications, length of stay, readmissions, reoperations, and discharge disposition. Mobility outcomes included Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) daily activity score, post-therapy session pain rating, and gait trial distance from the first inpatient physical therapy session.

Results: Patients within the liberal ambulation protocol cohort had shorter hospital stays ( P <0.001) and were less likely to require reoperation within 1 year of surgery ( P =0.013). Patients within the restricted ambulation protocol were more likely to experience a complication ( P =0.005) and were less likely to be discharged home after surgery ( P =0.020). Patients at the liberal ambulation hospital had higher AM-PAC basic mobility scores ( P <0.001) and achieved further gait distances ( P <0.001). On multivariable regression analysis, a further gait distance at the first inpatient PT session was a significant predictor of decreased odds of inpatient complications ( P =0.010), decreased length of stay ( P =0.005), and increased odds of discharge to home ( P <0.001).

Conclusions: Liberal ambulation protocols are safe and effective postoperative management strategies after PLDF to decrease inpatient complications, length of stay and discharge to a rehabilitation facility. These findings highlight the role that such protocols can play in helping patients to achieve early mobilization and favorable short-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信